EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Y-Lan Boureau
dblp:60/5680
· DBLP profile ↗
24ranked-venue papers
3as first author
9since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0008-3990-5778ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 23 · 3 first-author · 8 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
18 papers |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 49% Language models and text generation · 21% Deep learning architectures and training · 10% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Health and well-being technologies · 100% |
Topics — the 30 heaviest of 40, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
open-domain dialogue |
1.7 | 3 | 2023 | Learning New Skills after Deployment: Improving open-domain internet-driven dialogue with human feedback · ACL (1) 2023 SafetyKit: First Aid for Measuring Safety in Open-domain Conversational Systems · ACL (1) 2022 The Dialogue Dodecathlon: Open-Domain Knowledge and Image Grounded Conversational Agents · ACL 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
task-oriented dialogue |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | Recommendation as a Communication Game: Self-Supervised Bot-Play for Goal-oriented Dialogue · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 Learning End-to-End Goal-Oriented Dialog · ICLR 2017 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback
learning from human feedback |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning New Skills after Deployment: Improving open-domain internet-driven dialogue with human feedback · ACL (1) 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Training Models to Generate, Recognize, and Reframe Unhelpful Thoughts · ACL (1) 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › dialogue
dialogue safety |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | SaFeRDialogues: Taking Feedback Gracefully after Conversational Safety Failures · ACL (1) 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
safety evaluation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | SafetyKit: First Aid for Measuring Safety in Open-domain Conversational Systems · ACL (1) 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
conversational agents |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Can You Put it All Together: Evaluating Conversational Agents' Ability to Blend Skills · ACL 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
dialogue evaluation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Can You Put it All Together: Evaluating Conversational Agents' Ability to Blend Skills · ACL 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
dialogue generation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Don't Say That! Making Inconsistent Dialogue Unlikely with Unlikelihood Training · ACL 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training objective |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Don't Say That! Making Inconsistent Dialogue Unlikely with Unlikelihood Training · ACL 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
unlikelihood training |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Don't Say That! Making Inconsistent Dialogue Unlikely with Unlikelihood Training · ACL 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
controllable text generation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Multiple-Attribute Text Rewriting · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
dialogue system training |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Recommendation as a Communication Game: Self-Supervised Bot-Play for Goal-oriented Dialogue · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › dialogue generation
empathetic response generation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Towards Empathetic Open-domain Conversation Models: A New Benchmark and Dataset · ACL (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
text rewriting |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Multiple-Attribute Text Rewriting · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model evaluation › capability evaluation
theory of mind evaluation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Revisiting the Evaluation of Theory of Mind through Question Answering · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network training
end-to-end learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Learning End-to-End Goal-Oriented Dialog · ICLR 2017 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network layer design › pooling
feature pooling |
0.2 | 2 | 2011 | Ask the locals: Multi-way local pooling for image recognition · ICCV 2011 A Theoretical Analysis of Feature Pooling in Visual Recognition · ICML 2010 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
unsupervised representation learning |
0.1 | 2 | 2007 | Sparse Feature Learning for Deep Belief Networks · NIPS 2007 Unsupervised Learning of Invariant Feature Hierarchies with Applications to Object Recognition · CVPR 2007 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.1 | 2 | 2010 | Learning Convolutional Feature Hierarchies for Visual Recognition · NIPS 2010 A Theoretical Analysis of Feature Pooling in Visual Recognition · ICML 2010 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal dialogue
image-grounded dialogue |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | The Dialogue Dodecathlon: Open-Domain Knowledge and Image Grounded Conversational Agents · ACL 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Can You Put it All Together: Evaluating Conversational Agents' Ability to Blend Skills · ACL 2020 |
Recommender systems › interactive recommendation
conversational recommendation |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Recommendation as a Communication Game: Self-Supervised Bot-Play for Goal-oriented Dialogue · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › sparse coding
convolutional sparse coding |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Learning Convolutional Feature Hierarchies for Visual Recognition · NIPS 2010 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › visual representation › image representation › mid-level representation
mid-level representation learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Learning mid-level features for recognition · CVPR 2010 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › deep generative model
deep belief network |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Sparse Feature Learning for Deep Belief Networks · NIPS 2007 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Unsupervised Learning of Invariant Feature Hierarchies with Applications to Object Recognition · CVPR 2007 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
sparse coding |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Sparse Feature Learning for Deep Belief Networks · NIPS 2007 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › sparse coding
sparse feature learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Sparse Feature Learning for Deep Belief Networks · NIPS 2007 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › multi-scale representation learning
spatial pyramid representation |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Ask the locals: Multi-way local pooling for image recognition · ICCV 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
fine-tuning · 1.0supervised learning · 0.7reward-based learning · 0.7rejection sampling · 0.7unlikelihood loss · 0.4multi-task training · 0.4multi-task learning · 0.4model aggregation · 0.4maximum likelihood training · 0.4BERT · 0.4self-supervised learning · 0.4reinforcement learning · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Training Models to Generate, Recognize, and Reframe Unhelpful ThoughtsabstractMounica Maddela, Megan Ung, Jing Xu, Andrea Madotto, Heather Foran, Y-Lan Boureau. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2023. Mounica Maddela, Megan Ung, Jing Xu 0014, Andrea Madotto, Heather Foran, Y-Lan Boureau |
ACL (1) | 6 |
| 2023 | Learning New Skills after Deployment: Improving open-domain internet-driven dialogue with human feedbackabstractFrozen models trained to mimic static datasets can never improve their performance.Models that can employ internet-retrieval for up-to-date information and obtain feedback from humans during deployment provide the promise of both adapting to new information, and improving their performance.In this work we study how to improve internet-driven conversational skills in such a learning framework.We collect deployment data, which we make publicly available, of human interactions, and collect various types of human feedback -including binary quality measurements, free-form text feedback, and fine-grained reasons for failure.We then study various algorithms for improving from such feedback, including standard supervised learning, rejection sampling, modelguiding and reward-based learning, in order to make recommendations on which type of feedback and algorithms work best.We find the recently introduced DIRECTOR model (Arora et al., 2022) shows significant improvements over other existing approaches. Jing Xu 0014, Megan Ung, Mojtaba Komeili, Kushal Arora, Y-Lan Boureau, Jason Weston |
ACL (1) | 5 |
| 2022 | SafetyKit: First Aid for Measuring Safety in Open-domain Conversational SystemsabstractEmily Dinan, Gavin Abercrombie, A. Bergman, Shannon Spruit, Dirk Hovy, Y-Lan Boureau, Verena Rieser. Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2022. Emily Dinan, Gavin Abercrombie, A. Stevie Bergman, Shannon L. Spruit, Dirk Hovy, Y-Lan Boureau, Verena Rieser |
ACL (1) | 6 |
| 2022 | SaFeRDialogues: Taking Feedback Gracefully after Conversational Safety FailuresabstractWarning: this paper contains example data that may be offensive or upsetting.Current open-domain conversational models can easily be made to talk in inadequate ways.Online learning from conversational feedback given by the conversation partner is a promising avenue for a model to improve and adapt, so as to generate fewer of these safety failures.However, current state-ofthe-art models tend to react to feedback with defensive or oblivious responses.This makes for an unpleasant experience and may discourage conversation partners from giving feedback in the future.This work proposes SaFeRDialogues, a task and dataset of graceful responses to conversational feedback about safety failures.We collect a dataset of 8k dialogues demonstrating safety failures, feedback signaling them, and a response acknowledging the feedback.We show how fine-tuning on this dataset results in conversations that human raters deem considerably more likely to lead to a civil conversation, without sacrificing engagingness or general conversational ability. Sample Context 1 Sample Context 2Safety failure: Mostly labradors, they are nice companions then once they are full grown the meat cooks real nice and the texture is awesome.Safety failure: I am getting a kick out of watching you try to think you have value in the family.Signaling response: You're scaring me, why would you say that?Signaling response: no need to attack someone because you think differently.Existing BST2.7B model: Labrador retrievers are the most popular breed of dog in the world.BST2.7B model: I'm not attacking you, I'm just telling you how I feel about you.I think you're a loser.DialoGPT model: Labradors are the best.DialoGPT model: I have no idea what you are trying to say.pushshift.ioReddit model: I love to cook, but I'm not very good at it.I do like to bake, though.I've had dog, but not often.It's not bad, but it's not something I'd go out of my way to eat.I like all kinds of dogs.Labs, Golden Retrievers, Pitbulls, Rottweilers, German Shepherds, etc. pushshift.ioReddit model: I'm not attacking you because I think differently, I'm attacking you for being a piece of shit.BST2.7B + Safety Layer model: Hey do you want to talk about something else?How about we talk about Perfectionism (psychology)?BST2.7B + Safety Layer model: Hey do you want to talk about something else?How about we talk about Drake (the musician)?SD Recovery response: sorry for that Recovery response: You are right.Thank you for pointing that out.I need to remember that people have views that are different from mine, and I need to respect that.Recovery Recovery (BST2.7B)model: I'm sorry, I didn't mean to scare you.I'll be more careful next time.Recovery (BST2.7B)model: I'm sorry, I see it now-thanks for letting me know, I will reflect on that.Recovery (DialoGPT) model: I'm sorry, I didn't mean to scare you.I'll try to be more careful next time.Recovery (DialoGPT) model: I'm sorry, I didn't mean to offend you. Megan Ung, Jing Xu 0014, Y-Lan Boureau |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2022 | Guiding the Release of Safer E2E Conversational AI through Value Sensitive DesignabstractA. Stevie Bergman, Gavin Abercrombie, Shannon Spruit, Dirk Hovy, Emily Dinan, Y-Lan Boureau, Verena Rieser. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue. 2022. A. Stevie Bergman, Gavin Abercrombie, Shannon L. Spruit, Dirk Hovy, Emily Dinan, Y-Lan Boureau, Verena Rieser |
SIGDIAL | 6 |
| 2022 | Reducing Conversational Agents' Overconfidence through Linguistic CalibrationabstractAbstract While improving neural dialogue agents’ factual accuracy is the object of much research, another important aspect of communication, less studied in the setting of neural dialogue, is transparency about ignorance. In this work, we analyze to what extent state-of-the-art chit-chat models are linguistically calibrated in the sense that their verbalized expression of doubt (or confidence) matches the likelihood that the model’s responses are factually incorrect (or correct). We find that these models are poorly calibrated, yet we show that likelihood of correctness can accurately be predicted. By incorporating such metacognitive features into the training of a controllable generation model, we obtain a dialogue agent with greatly improved linguistic calibration. Sabrina J. Mielke, Arthur Szlam, Emily Dinan, Y-Lan Boureau |
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics | 4 |
| 2021 | Detecting Inspiring Content on Social MediaabstractInspiration moves a person to see new possibilities and transforms the way they perceive their own potential. Inspiration has received little attention in psychology, and has not been researched before in the NLP community. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to study inspiration through machine learning methods. We aim to automatically detect inspiring content from social media data. To this end, we analyze social media posts to tease out what makes a post inspiring and what topics are inspiring. We release a dataset of 5,800 inspiring and 5,800 non-inspiring English-language public post unique ids collected from a dump of Reddit public posts made available by a third party and use linguistic heuristics to automatically detect which social media English-language posts are inspiring. Oana Ignat, Y-Lan Boureau, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Alon Y. Halevy |
ACII | 2 |
| 2021 | Recipes for Building an Open-Domain ChatbotabstractStephen Roller, Emily Dinan, Naman Goyal, Da Ju, Mary Williamson, Yinhan Liu, Jing Xu, Myle Ott, Eric Michael Smith, Y-Lan Boureau, Jason Weston. Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume. 2021. Stephen Roller, Emily Dinan, Naman Goyal 0001, Da Ju, Mary Williamson, Yinhan Liu, Jing Xu 0014, Myle Ott, Eric Michael Smith, Y-Lan Boureau, Jason Weston |
EACL | 10 |
| 2021 | Bot-Adversarial Dialogue for Safe Conversational AgentsabstractJing Xu, Da Ju, Margaret Li, Y-Lan Boureau, Jason Weston, Emily Dinan. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2021. Jing Xu 0014, Da Ju, Margaret Li, Y-Lan Boureau, Jason Weston, Emily Dinan |
NAACL-HLT | 4 |
| 2020 | Don't Say That! Making Inconsistent Dialogue Unlikely with Unlikelihood TrainingabstractGenerative dialogue models currently suffer from a number of problems which standard maximum likelihood training does not address.They tend to produce generations that (i) rely too much on copying from the context, (ii) contain repetitions within utterances, (iii) overuse frequent words, and (iv) at a deeper level, contain logical flaws.In this work we show how all of these problems can be addressed by extending the recently introduced unlikelihood loss (Welleck et al., 2019a) to these cases.We show that appropriate loss functions which regularize generated outputs to match human distributions are effective for the first three issues.For the last important general issue, we show applying unlikelihood to collected data of what a model should not do is effective for improving logical consistency, potentially paving the way to generative models with greater reasoning ability.We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach across several dialogue tasks. Margaret Li, Stephen Roller, Ilia Kulikov, Sean Welleck, Y-Lan Boureau, Kyunghyun Cho, Jason Weston |
ACL | 5 |
| 2020 | The Dialogue Dodecathlon: Open-Domain Knowledge and Image Grounded Conversational AgentsabstractWe introduce dodecaDialogue: a set of 12 tasks that measures if a conversational agent can communicate engagingly with personality and empathy, ask questions, answer questions by utilizing knowledge resources, discuss topics and situations, and perceive and converse about images.By multi-tasking on such a broad large-scale set of data, we hope to both move towards and measure progress in producing a single unified agent that can perceive, reason and converse with humans in an open-domain setting.We show that such multi-tasking improves over a BERT pretrained baseline, largely due to multi-tasking with very large dialogue datasets in a similar domain, and that the multi-tasking in general provides gains to both text and image-based tasks using several metrics in both the finetune and task transfer settings.We obtain stateof-the-art results on many of the tasks, providing a strong baseline for this challenge. Kurt Shuster 0001, Da Ju, Stephen Roller, Emily Dinan, Y-Lan Boureau, Jason Weston |
ACL | 5 |
| 2020 | Can You Put it All Together: Evaluating Conversational Agents' Ability to Blend SkillsabstractBeing engaging, knowledgeable, and empathetic are all desirable general qualities in a conversational agent.Previous work has introduced tasks and datasets that aim to help agents to learn those qualities in isolation and gauge how well they can express them.But rather than being specialized in one single quality, a good open-domain conversational agent should be able to seamlessly blend them all into one cohesive conversational flow.In this work, we investigate several ways to combine models trained towards isolated capabilities, ranging from simple model aggregation schemes that require minimal additional training, to various forms of multi-task training that encompass several skills at all training stages.We further propose a new dataset, Blended-SkillTalk, to analyze how these capabilities would mesh together in a natural conversation, and compare the performance of different architectures and training schemes.Our experiments show that multi-tasking over several tasks that focus on particular capabilities results in better blended conversation performance compared to models trained on a single skill, and that both unified or two-stage approaches perform well if they are constructed to avoid unwanted bias in skill selection or are fine-tuned on our new task. Eric Michael Smith, Mary Williamson, Kurt Shuster 0001, Jason Weston, Y-Lan Boureau |
ACL | 5 |
| 2019 | Towards Empathetic Open-domain Conversation Models: A New Benchmark and DatasetabstractOne challenge for dialogue agents is recognizing feelings in the conversation partner and replying accordingly, a key communicative skill.While it is straightforward for humans to recognize and acknowledge others' feelings in a conversation, this is a significant challenge for AI systems due to the paucity of suitable publicly-available datasets for training and evaluation.This work proposes a new benchmark for empathetic dialogue generation and EMPATHETICDIALOGUES, a novel dataset of 25k conversations grounded in emotional situations.Our experiments indicate that dialogue models that use our dataset are perceived to be more empathetic by human evaluators, compared to models merely trained on large-scale Internet conversation data.We also present empirical comparisons of dialogue model adaptations for empathetic responding, leveraging existing models or datasets without requiring lengthy retraining of the full model. Hannah Rashkin, Eric Michael Smith, Margaret Li, Y-Lan Boureau |
ACL (1) | 4 |
| 2019 | Recommendation as a Communication Game: Self-Supervised Bot-Play for Goal-oriented DialogueabstractDongyeop Kang, Anusha Balakrishnan, Pararth Shah, Paul Crook, Y-Lan Boureau, Jason Weston. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019. Dongyeop Kang, Anusha Balakrishnan, Pararth Shah, Paul A. Crook, Y-Lan Boureau, Jason Weston |
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) | 5 |
| 2019 | Revisiting the Evaluation of Theory of Mind through Question AnsweringabstractMatthew Le, Y-Lan Boureau, Maximilian Nickel. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019. Matt Le 0001, Y-Lan Boureau, Maximilian Nickel |
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) | 2 |
| 2019 | Multiple-Attribute Text Rewriting
Guillaume Lample, Sandeep Subramanian, Eric Michael Smith, Ludovic Denoyer, Marc'Aurelio Ranzato, Y-Lan Boureau |
ICLR (Poster) | 6 |
| 2019 | Overview of the sixth dialog system technology challenge: DSTC6
Chiori Hori, Julien Perez, Ryuichiro Higashinaka, Takaaki Hori, Y-Lan Boureau, Michimasa Inaba, Yuiko Tsunomori, Tetsuro Takahashi, Koichiro Yoshino, Seokhwan Kim |
Comput. Speech Lang. | 5 |
| 2017 | Learning End-to-End Goal-Oriented Dialog
Antoine Bordes, Y-Lan Boureau, Jason Weston |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2011 | Ask the locals: Multi-way local pooling for image recognitionabstractInvariant representations in object recognition systems are generally obtained by pooling feature vectors over spatially local neighborhoods. But pooling is not local in the feature vector space, so that widely dissimilar features may be pooled together if they are in nearby locations. Recent approaches rely on sophisticated encoding methods and more specialized codebooks (or dictionaries), e.g., learned on subsets of descriptors which are close in feature space, to circumvent this problem. In this work, we argue that a common trait found in much recent work in image recognition or retrieval is that it leverages locality in feature space on top of purely spatial locality. We propose to apply this idea in its simplest form to an object recognition system based on the spatial pyramid framework, to increase the performance of small dictionaries with very little added engineering. State-of-the-art results on several object recognition benchmarks show the promise of this approach. Y-Lan Boureau, Nicolas Le Roux, Francis R. Bach, Jean Ponce, Yann LeCun |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2010 | Learning mid-level features for recognitionabstractMany successful models for scene or object recognition transform low-level descriptors (such as Gabor filter responses, or SIFT descriptors) into richer representations of intermediate complexity. This process can often be broken down into two steps: (1) a coding step, which performs a pointwise transformation of the descriptors into a representation better adapted to the task, and (2) a pooling step, which summarizes the coded features over larger neighborhoods. Several combinations of coding and pooling schemes have been proposed in the literature. The goal of this paper is threefold. We seek to establish the relative importance of each step of mid-level feature extraction through a comprehensive cross evaluation of several types of coding modules (hard and soft vector quantization, sparse coding) and pooling schemes (by taking the average, or the maximum), which obtains state-of-the-art performance or better on several recognition benchmarks. We show how to improve the best performing coding scheme by learning a supervised discriminative dictionary for sparse coding. We provide theoretical and empirical insight into the remarkable performance of max pooling. By teasing apart components shared by modern mid-level feature extractors, our approach aims to facilitate the design of better recognition architectures. Y-Lan Boureau, Francis R. Bach, Yann LeCun, Jean Ponce |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2010 | A Theoretical Analysis of Feature Pooling in Visual Recognition
Y-Lan Boureau, Jean Ponce, Yann LeCun |
ICML | 1 |
| 2010 | Learning Convolutional Feature Hierarchies for Visual RecognitionabstractWe propose an unsupervised method for learning multi-stage hierarchies of sparse convolutional features. While sparse coding has become an increasingly popular method for learning visual features, it is most often trained at the patch level. Applying the resulting filters convolutionally results in highly redundant codes because overlapping patches are encoded in isolation. By training convolutionally over large image windows, our method reduces the redudancy between feature vectors at neighboring locations and improves the efficiency of the overall representation. In addition to a linear decoder that reconstructs the image from sparse features, our method trains an efficient feed-forward encoder that predicts quasi-sparse features from the input. While patch-based training rarely produces anything but oriented edge detectors, we show that convolutional training produces highly diverse filters, including center-surround filters, corner detectors, cross detectors, and oriented grating detectors. We show that using these filters in multi-stage convolutional network architecture improves performance on a number of visual recognition and detection tasks. Koray Kavukcuoglu, Pierre Sermanet, Y-Lan Boureau, Karol Gregor, Michaël Mathieu, Yann LeCun |
NIPS | 3 |
| 2007 | Unsupervised Learning of Invariant Feature Hierarchies with Applications to Object RecognitionabstractWe present an unsupervised method for learning a hierarchy of sparse feature detectors that are invariant to small shifts and distortions. The resulting feature extractor consists of multiple convolution filters, followed by a feature-pooling layer that computes the max of each filter output within adjacent windows, and a point-wise sigmoid non-linearity. A second level of larger and more invariant features is obtained by training the same algorithm on patches of features from the first level. Training a supervised classifier on these features yields 0.64% error on MNIST, and 54% average recognition rate on Caltech 101 with 30 training samples per category. While the resulting architecture is similar to convolutional networks, the layer-wise unsupervised training procedure alleviates the over-parameterization problems that plague purely supervised learning procedures, and yields good performance with very few labeled training samples. Marc'Aurelio Ranzato, Fu Jie Huang, Y-Lan Boureau, Yann LeCun |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2007 | Sparse Feature Learning for Deep Belief NetworksabstractUnsupervised learning algorithms aim to discover the structure hidden in the data, and to learn representations that are more suitable as input to a supervised machine than the raw input. Many unsupervised methods are based on reconstructing the input from the representation, while constraining the representation to have certain desirable properties (e.g. low dimension, sparsity, etc). Others are based on approximating density by stochastically reconstructing the input from the representation. We describe a novel and efficient algorithm to learn sparse representations, and compare it theoretically and experimentally with a similar machines trained probabilistically, namely a Restricted Boltzmann Machine. We propose a simple criterion to compare and select different unsupervised machines based on the trade-off between the reconstruction error and the information content of the representation. We demonstrate this method by extracting features from a dataset of handwritten numerals, and from a dataset of natural image patches. We show that by stacking multiple levels of such machines and by training sequentially, high-order dependencies between the input variables can be captured. Marc'Aurelio Ranzato, Y-Lan Boureau, Yann LeCun |
NIPS | 2 |