EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nathan Folkert
dblp:60/6364
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
5 papers |
Data models and query languages · 44% Query processing and optimization · 41% Distributed and cloud data management · 12% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data models and query languages › SQL
SQL extension |
0.1 | 3 | 2005 | Advanced SQL modeling in RDBMS · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 2005 Data Densification in a Relational Database System · SIGMOD Conference 2004 Spreadsheets in RDBMS for OLAP · SIGMOD Conference 2003 |
Distributed and cloud data management
array processing |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Advanced SQL modeling in RDBMS · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 2005 |
Data models and query languages
query language |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Advanced SQL modeling in RDBMS · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 2005 |
Query processing and optimization
query optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Advanced SQL modeling in RDBMS · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 2005 |
Query processing and optimization
view maintenance |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Optimizing Refresh of a Set of Materialized Views · VLDB 2005 |
Query processing and optimization › OLAP
OLAP query optimization |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Spreadsheets in RDBMS for OLAP · SIGMOD Conference 2003 |
Query processing and optimization › OLAP
OLAP query processing |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Spreadsheets in RDBMS for OLAP · SIGMOD Conference 2003 |
Data models and query languages
SQL |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Business Modelling Using SQL Spreadsheets · VLDB 2003 |
Database system architecture and tuning › analytical database system
ROLAP |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Advanced SQL modeling in RDBMS · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 2005 |
Data models and query languages
query interface |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Business Modelling Using SQL Spreadsheets · VLDB 2003 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
query optimization · 0.1parameterization · 0.1access structure design · 0.1window functions · 0.0partitioned outer join · 0.0array-based execution models · 0.0SQL window functions · 0.0MOLAP engines · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Optimizing Refresh of a Set of Materialized Views
Nathan Folkert, Abhinav Gupta 0003, Andrew Witkowski, Sankar Subramanian, Srikanth Bellamkonda, Shrikanth Shankar, Tolga Bozkaya |
VLDB | 1 |
| 2005 | Advanced SQL modeling in RDBMSabstractCommercial relational database systems lack support for complex business modeling. ANSI SQL cannot treat relations as multidimensional arrays and define multiple, interrelated formulas over them, operations which are needed for business modeling. Relational OLAP (ROLAP) applications have to perform such tasks using joins, SQL Window Functions, complex CASE expressions, and the GROUP BY operator simulating the pivot operation. The designated place in SQL for calculations is the SELECT clause, which is extremely limiting and forces the user to generate queries with nested views, subqueries and complex joins. Furthermore, SQL query optimizers are preoccupied with determining efficient join orders and choosing optimal access methods and largely disregard optimization of multiple, interrelated formulas. Research into execution methods has thus far concentrated on efficient computation of data cubes and cube compression rather than on access structures for random, interrow calculations. This has created a gap that has been filled by spreadsheets and specialized MOLAP engines, which are good at specification of formulas for modeling but lack the formalism of the relational model, are difficult to coordinate across large user groups, exhibit scalability problems, and require replication of data between the tool and RDBMS. This article presents an SQL extension called SQL Spreadsheet , to provide array calculations over relations for complex modeling. We present optimizations, access structures, and execution models for processing them efficiently. Special attention is paid to compile time optimization for expensive operations like aggregation. Furthermore, ANSI SQL does not provide a good separation between data and computation and hence cannot support parameterization for SQL Spreadsheets models. We propose two parameterization methods for SQL. One parameterizes ANSI SQL view using subqueries and scalars, which allows passing data to SQL Spreadsheet. Another method presents parameterization of the SQL Spreadsheet formulas. This supports building stand-alone SQL Spreadsheet libraries. These models are then subject to the SQL Spreadsheet optimizations during model invocation time. Andrew Witkowski, Srikanth Bellamkonda, Tolga Bozkaya, Nathan Folkert, Abhinav Gupta 0003, John Haydu, Sankar Subramanian |
ACM Trans. Database Syst. | 4 |
| 2004 | Data Densification in a Relational Database SystemabstractData in a relational data warehouse is usually sparse. That is, if no value exists for a given combination of dimension values, no row exists in the fact table. Densities of 0.1-2% are very common. However, users may want to view the data in a dense form, with rows for all combination of dimension values displayed even when no fact data exists for them. For example, if a product did not sell during a particular time period, users may still want to see the product for that time period with zero sales value next to it. Moreover, analytic window functions [1] and the SQL model clause [2] can more easily express time series calculations if data is dense along the time dimension because dense data will fill a consistent number of rows for each period.Data densification is the process of converting spare data into dense form. The current SQL technique for densification (using the combination of DISTINCT, CROSS JOIN and OUTER JOIN operations) is extremely unintuitive, difficult to express and inefficient to compute. Hence, we propose an extension to the ANSI SQL join operator, referred to as "PARTITIONED OUTER JOIN", which allows for a succinct expression of densification along the dimensions of interest. We also present various algorithms to evaluate the new join operator efficiently and compare it with existing methods of doing the equivalent operation. We also define a new window function "LAST_VALUE (IGNORE NULLS)" which is very useful with partitioned outer join. Abhinav Gupta 0003, Sankar Subramanian, Srikanth Bellamkonda, Tolga Bozkaya, Nathan Folkert, Andrew Witkowski |
SIGMOD Conference | 5 |
| 2003 | Spreadsheets in RDBMS for OLAPabstractOne of the critical deficiencies of SQL is lack of support for n-dimensional array-based computations which are frequent in OLAP environments. Relational OLAP (ROLAP) applications have to emulate them using joins, recently introduced SQL Window Functions [18] and complex and inefficient CASE expressions. The designated place in SQL for specifying calculations is the SELECT clause, which is extremely limiting and forces the user to generate queries using nested views, subqueries and complex joins. Furthermore, SQL-query optimizer is pre-occupied with determining efficient join orders and choosing optimal access methods and largely disregards optimization of complex numerical formulas. Execution methods concentrated on efficient computation of a cube [11], [16] rather than on random access structures for inter-row calculations. This has created a gap that has been filled by spreadsheets and specialized MOLAP engines, which are good at formulas for mathematical modeling but lack the formalism of the relational model, are difficult to manage, and exhibit scalability problems. This paper presents SQL extensions involving array based calculations for complex modeling. In addition, we present optimizations, access structures and execution models for processing them efficiently. 1 Andrew Witkowski, Srikanth Bellamkonda, Tolga Bozkaya, Gregory Dorman, Nathan Folkert, Abhinav Gupta 0003, Sankar Subramanian |
SIGMOD Conference | 5 |
| 2003 | Business Modelling Using SQL Spreadsheets
Andrew Witkowski, Srikanth Bellamkonda, Tolga Bozkaya, Nathan Folkert, Abhinav Gupta 0003, Sankar Subramanian |
VLDB | 4 |