Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

William B. Pressly

dblp:60/7880 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Debugging and program repair · 87% Program analysis · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Debugging and program repair
fault localization
0.112009
A Linear Programming Approach for Automated Localization of Multiple Faults · ASE 2009
Debugging and program repair › fault localization
multiple fault localization
0.112009
A Linear Programming Approach for Automated Localization of Multiple Faults · ASE 2009
Program analysis › dynamic analysis › trace analysis
execution trace analysis
0.012009
A Linear Programming Approach for Automated Localization of Multiple Faults · ASE 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

linear programming · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 A Linear Programming Approach for Automated Localization of Multiple Faults
abstract
In this paper, we address the problem of localizing faults by analyzing execution traces of successful and unsuccessful invocations of the application when run against a suite of tests. We present a new algorithm, based on a linear programming model, which is designed to be particularly effective for the case where multiple faults are present in the application under investigation. Through an extensive empirical study, we show that in the case of both single and multiple faults, our approach outperforms a host of prominent fault localization methods from the literature.
Brian C. Dean, William B. Pressly, Brian A. Malloy, Adam Whitley 0001
ASE2