Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Joshua C. Chang

dblp:61/11276 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 75% Trustworthy machine learning · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.512021
Sparse encoding for more-interpretable feature-selecting representations in probabilistic matrix factorization · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
matrix factorization
0.512021
Sparse encoding for more-interpretable feature-selecting representations in probabilistic matrix factorization · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › matrix factorization
probabilistic matrix factorization
0.512021
Sparse encoding for more-interpretable feature-selecting representations in probabilistic matrix factorization · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
sparse coding
0.512021
Sparse encoding for more-interpretable feature-selecting representations in probabilistic matrix factorization · ICLR 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sparse encoding · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Autoencoded sparse Bayesian in-IRT factorization, calibration, and amortized inference for the Work Disability Functional Assessment Battery
abstract
The Work Disability Functional Assessment Battery (WD-FAB) is a multidimensional item response theory (IRT) instrument designed for assessing work-related mental and physical function based on responses to an item bank. In prior iterations it was developed using traditional means – linear factorization and null hypothesis statistical testing for item partitioning/selection, and finally, posthoc calibration of disjoint unidimensional IRT models. As a result, the WD-FAB, like many other IRT instruments, is a posthoc model. Its item partitioning, based on exploratory factor analysis, is blind to the final nonlinear IRT model and is not performed in a manner consistent with goodness of fit to the final model. In this manuscript, we develop a Bayesian hierarchical model for self-consistently performing the following simultaneous tasks: scale factorization, item selection, parameter identification, and response scoring. This method uses sparsity-based shrinkage to obviate the linear factorization and null hypothesis statistical tests that are usually required for developing multidimensional IRT models, so that item partitioning is consistent with the ultimate nonlinear factor model. We also analogize our multidimensional IRT model to probabilistic autoencoders, specifying an encoder function that amortizes the inference of ability parameters from item responses. The encoder function is equivalent to the “VBE” step in a stochastic variational Bayesian expectation maximization (VBEM) procedure that we use for approximate Bayesian inference on the entire model. We use the method on a sample of WD-FAB item responses and compare the resulting item discriminations to those obtained using the traditional posthoc method.
Joshua C. Chang, Carson C. Chow, Julia Porcino
AISTATS1
2021 Sparse encoding for more-interpretable feature-selecting representations in probabilistic matrix factorization
Joshua C. Chang, Patrick Fletcher, Jungmin Han, Ted L. Chang, Shashaank Vattikuti, Bart Desmet, Ayah Zirikly, Carson C. Chow
ICLR1
2020 A mathematical model for persistent post-CSD vasoconstriction
abstract
Cortical spreading depression (CSD) is the propagation of a relatively slow wave in cortical brain tissue that is linked to a number of pathological conditions such as stroke and migraine. Most of the existing literature investigates the dynamics of short term phenomena such as the depolarization and repolarization of membrane potentials or large ion shifts. Here, we focus on the clinically-relevant hour-long state of neurovascular malfunction in the wake of CSDs. This dysfunctional state involves widespread vasoconstriction and a general disruption of neurovascular coupling. We demonstrate, using a mathematical model, that dissolution of calcium that has aggregated within the mitochondria of vascular smooth muscle cells can drive an hour-long disruption. We model the rate of calcium clearance as well as the dynamical implications on overall blood flow. Based on reaction stoichiometry, we quantify a possible impact of calcium phosphate dissolution on the maintenance of F0F1-ATP synthase activity.
Shixin Xu, Joshua C. Chang, Carson C. Chow, K. C. Brennan, Huaxiong Huang
PLoS Comput. Biol.2
2012 Tracking Monotonically Advancing Boundaries in Image Sequences Using Graph Cuts and Recursive Kernel Shape Priors
abstract
We introduce a probabilistic computer vision technique to track monotonically advancing boundaries of objects within image sequences. Our method incorporates a novel technique for including statistical prior shape information into graph-cut based segmentation, with the aid of a majorization-minimization algorithm. Extension of segmentation from single images to image sequences then follows naturally using sequential Bayesian estimation. Our methodology is applied to two unrelated sets of real biomedical imaging data, and a set of synthetic images. Our results are shown to be superior to manual segmentation.
Joshua C. Chang, K. C. Brennan, Tom Chou
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging1