Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nancy S. Eickelmann

dblp:61/1382 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing
software testing evaluation
0.011996
An Evaluation of Software Test Environment Architectures · ICSE 1996
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 Empirical Software Simulation for COTS Glue Code Development and Integration
abstract
The use of COTS (commercial-off-the-shelf) components for system development has been a growing trend in the software engineering community during the past decade. However, the engineering of COTS-based systems involves significant technical risks. A good indicator of the as yet unresolved difficulties in COTS-based system developments is the relatively poor understanding frequently regarding the processes associated with development of the "glue code" used to integrate COTS components into the system, as well as with the other integration activities. The main objective of the paper is to understand how the glue code development process and the COTS component integration process affect each other and how they affect development effort and schedule throughout the development life cycle, based on given parameters via software simulation that provides a method for checking the understanding of the real world process and thus help people produce better results in the future.
Jongmoon Baik, Nancy S. Eickelmann, Chris Abts
COMPSAC2
1999 Technology Review: Adapting Financial Measures: Making a Business Case for Software Process Improvement*
Warren Harrison, David Raffo, John Settle, Nancy S. Eickelmann
Softw. Qual. J.4
1996 An Evaluation of Software Test Environment Architectures
Nancy S. Eickelmann, Debra J. Richardson
ICSE1