Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nieraj Singh
dblp:61/2789
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software maintenance and evolution · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Parallel and multicore computing · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software maintenance and evolution › program comprehension
software visualization |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Living with the Law: Can Automation give us Moore with Less? · ASE 2008 |
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computing › parallel software engineering
multicore software engineering |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Living with the Law: Can Automation give us Moore with Less? · ASE 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
static analysis · 0.2dynamic analysis · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Living with the Law: Can Automation give us Moore with Less?abstractMulti-core programming presents developers with a dramatic paradigm shift. Whereas sequential programming largely allowed the decoupling of source from underlying architecture, it is now impossible to develop new patterns and abstractions in isolation from issues of modern hardware utilization. Synchronization and coordination are now manifested at all levels of the software stack, and developers currently lack the essential tools to even partially automate reasoning techniques and system configuration management. As a first stage to addressing this problem, this paper proposes a framework for a tool suite designed to partially automate the acquisition and management of static system visualization in a feedback loop with dynamic execution properties. This model enables developers to find a best fit system configuration, potentially reconciling resource contention and utilization tensions that are critical to multi-core platforms. The application of a prototype of this suite, Deja View, demonstrates how tool support can aid reasoning about causally related sets of changes across system artifacts. Celina Berg, Jennifer Baldwin, Nieraj Singh, Maja D'Hondt, Yvonne Coady |
ASE | 3 |