Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andreas Futschik
dblp:61/3105
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-7980-0304ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Information theory · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence annotation
sequence segmentation |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Multiscale DNA partitioning: statistical evidence for segments · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biostatistics › statistical bioinformatics
statistical genomics |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Multiscale DNA partitioning: statistical evidence for segments · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence alignment |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | On the significance of sequence alignments when using multiple scoring matrices · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | On the significance of sequence alignments when using multiple scoring matrices · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › multiple sequence alignment › alignment quality assessment
statistical significance of alignment scores |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | On the significance of sequence alignments when using multiple scoring matrices · Bioinform. 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical hypothesis testing · 0.2multiscale criterion · 0.2multiple testing correction · 0.1extreme value distribution · 0.1bonferroni correction · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Haplotype based testing for a better understanding of the selective architectureabstractBACKGROUND: The identification of genomic regions affected by selection is one of the most important goals in population genetics. If temporal data are available, allele frequency changes at SNP positions are often used for this purpose. Here we provide a new testing approach that uses haplotype frequencies instead of allele frequencies. RESULTS: Using simulated data, we show that compared to SNP based test, our approach has higher power, especially when the number of candidate haplotypes is small or moderate. To improve power when the number of haplotypes is large, we investigate methods to combine them with a moderate number of haplotype subsets. Haplotype frequencies can often be recovered with less noise than SNP frequencies, especially under pool sequencing, giving our test an additional advantage. Furthermore, spurious outlier SNPs may lead to false positives, a problem usually not encountered when working with haplotypes. Post hoc tests for the number of selected haplotypes and for differences between their selection coefficients are also provided for a better understanding of the underlying selection dynamics. An application on a real data set further illustrates the performance benefits. CONCLUSIONS: Due to less multiple testing correction and noise reduction, haplotype based testing is able to outperform SNP based tests in terms of power in most scenarios. Marta Pelizzola, Andreas Futschik |
BMC Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2014 | Multiscale DNA partitioning: statistical evidence for segmentsabstractMOTIVATION: DNA segmentation, i.e. the partitioning of DNA in compositionally homogeneous segments, is a basic task in bioinformatics. Different algorithms have been proposed for various partitioning criteria such as Guanine/Cytosine (GC) content, local ancestry in population genetics or copy number variation. A critical component of any such method is the choice of an appropriate number of segments. Some methods use model selection criteria and do not provide a suitable error control. Other methods that are based on simulating a statistic under a null model provide suitable error control only if the correct null model is chosen. RESULTS: Here, we focus on partitioning with respect to GC content and propose a new approach that provides statistical error control: as in statistical hypothesis testing, it guarantees with a user-specified probability [Formula: see text] that the number of identified segments does not exceed the number of actually present segments. The method is based on a statistical multiscale criterion, rendering this as a segmentation method that searches segments of any length (on all scales) simultaneously. It is also accurate in localizing segments: under benchmark scenarios, our approach leads to a segmentation that is more accurate than the approaches discussed in the comparative review of Elhaik et al. In our real data examples, we find segments that often correspond well to features taken from standard University of California at Santa Cruz (UCSC) genome annotation tracks. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our method is implemented in function smuceR of the R-package stepR available at http://www.stochastik.math.uni-goettingen.de/smuce. Andreas Futschik, Thomas Hotz, Axel Munk, Hannes Sieling |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2004 | On the significance of sequence alignments when using multiple scoring matricesabstractMOTIVATION: Pairwise local sequence alignment is commonly used to search data bases for sequences related to some query sequence. Alignments are obtained using a scoring matrix that takes into account the different frequencies of occurrence of the various types of amino acid substitutions. Software like BLAST provides the user with a set of scoring matrices available to choose from, and in the literature it is sometimes recommended to try several scoring matrices on the sequences of interest. The significance of an alignment is usually assessed by looking at E-values and p-values. While sequence lengths and data base sizes enter the standard calculations of significance, it is much less common to take the use of several scoring matrices on the same sequences into account. Altschul proposed corrections of the p-value that account for the simultaneous use of an infinite number of PAM matrices. Here we consider the more realistic situation where the user may choose from a finite set of popular PAM and BLOSUM matrices, in particular the ones available in BLAST. It turns out that the significance of a result can be considerably overestimated, if a set of substitution matrices is used in an alignment problem and the most significant alignment is then quoted. RESULTS: Based on extensive simulations, we study the multiple testing problem that occurs when several scoring matrices for local sequence alignment are used. We consider a simple Bonferroni correction of the p-values and investigate its accuracy. Finally, we propose a more accurate correction based on extreme value distributions fitted to the maximum of the normalized scores obtained from different scoring matrices. For various sets of matrices we provide correction factors which can be easily applied to adjust p- and E-values reported by software packages. Florian Frommlet, Andreas Futschik, Malgorzata Bogdan |
Bioinform. | 2 |