Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Christopher M. Sewell
dblp:61/3614
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Parallel and multicore computing · 63% High-performance computing · 37% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 73% Computational science and engineering · 27% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Visualization and visual analytics › topological data analysis
contour tree |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Scalable Contour Tree Computation by Data Parallel Peak Pruning · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2021 |
Visualization and visual analytics
topological data analysis |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Scalable Contour Tree Computation by Data Parallel Peak Pruning · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2021 |
Parallel and multicore computing
data-parallel programming |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Scalable Contour Tree Computation by Data Parallel Peak Pruning · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2021 |
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel algorithms |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Scalable Contour Tree Computation by Data Parallel Peak Pruning · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2021 |
High-performance computing › scientific data analysis
in-situ analysis |
0.4 | 2 | 2021 | Large-scale compute-intensive analysis via a combined in-situ and co-scheduling workflow approach · SC 2015 Scalable Contour Tree Computation by Data Parallel Peak Pruning · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics › peptide sequencing
de novo peptide sequencing |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | New computational approaches for de novo peptide sequencing from MS/MS experiments · Proc. IEEE 2002 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
peptide sequencing |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | New computational approaches for de novo peptide sequencing from MS/MS experiments · Proc. IEEE 2002 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
protein identification |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | New computational approaches for de novo peptide sequencing from MS/MS experiments · Proc. IEEE 2002 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
proteomics |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | New computational approaches for de novo peptide sequencing from MS/MS experiments · Proc. IEEE 2002 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
tandem mass spectrometry |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | New computational approaches for de novo peptide sequencing from MS/MS experiments · Proc. IEEE 2002 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
shared-memory parallelism · 1.0peak pruning · 1.0GPU-CPU hybrid computation · 1.0machine learning peak classification · 0.0graph-theoretic algorithms · 0.0chemical information integration · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Scalable Contour Tree Computation by Data Parallel Peak PruningabstractAs data sets grow to exascale, automated data analysis and visualization are increasingly important, to intermediate human understanding and to reduce demands on disk storage via in situ analysis. Trends in architecture of high performance computing systems necessitate analysis algorithms to make effective use of combinations of massively multicore and distributed systems. One of the principal analytic tools is the contour tree, which analyses relationships between contours to identify features of more than local importance. Unfortunately, the predominant algorithms for computing the contour tree are explicitly serial, and founded on serial metaphors, which has limited the scalability of this form of analysis. While there is some work on distributed contour tree computation, and separately on hybrid GPU-CPU computation, there is no efficient algorithm with strong formal guarantees on performance allied with fast practical performance. We report the first shared SMP algorithm for fully parallel contour tree computation, with formal guarantees of O(lg V lg t) parallel steps and O(V lg V) work for data with V samples and t contour tree supernodes, and implementations with more than 30× parallel speed up on both CPU using TBB and GPU using Thrust and up 70× speed up compared to the serial sweep and merge algorithm. Hamish A. Carr, Gunther H. Weber, Christopher M. Sewell, Oliver Rübel, Patricia K. Fasel, James P. Ahrens |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 3 |
| 2015 | Large-scale compute-intensive analysis via a combined in-situ and co-scheduling workflow approachabstractLarge-scale simulations can produce hundreds of terabytes to petabytes of data, complicating and limiting the efficiency of workflows. Traditionally, outputs are stored on the file system and analyzed in post-processing. With the rapidly increasing size and complexity of simulations, this approach faces an uncertain future. Trending techniques consist of performing the analysis in-situ, utilizing the same resources as the simulation, and/or off-loading subsets of the data to a compute-intensive analysis system. We introduce an analysis framework developed for HACC, a cosmological N-body code, that uses both in-situ and co-scheduling approaches for handling petabyte-scale outputs. We compare different analysis set-ups ranging from purely off-line, to purely in-situ to in-situ/co-scheduling. The analysis routines are implemented using the PISTON/VTK-m framework, allowing a single implementation of an algorithm that simultaneously targets a variety of GPU, multi-core, and many-core architectures. Christopher M. Sewell, Katrin Heitmann, Hal Finkel, George Zagaris, Suzanne Parete-Koon, Patricia K. Fasel, Adrian Pope, Nicholas Frontiere, Li-Ta Lo, O. E. Bronson Messer, Salman Habib 0002, James P. Ahrens |
SC | 1 |
| 2004 | A Collaborative Virtual Environment for the Simulation of Temporal Bone Surgery
Dan Morris 0001, Christopher M. Sewell, Nikolas H. Blevins, Federico Barbagli, John Kenneth Salisbury Jr. |
MICCAI (2) | 2 |
| 2004 | An Event-Driven Framework for the Simulation of Complex Surgical Procedures
Christopher M. Sewell, Dan Morris 0001, Nikolas H. Blevins, Federico Barbagli, John Kenneth Salisbury Jr. |
MICCAI (2) | 1 |
| 2002 | New computational approaches for de novo peptide sequencing from MS/MS experimentsabstractWe describe computational methods to solve the problem of identifying novel proteins from tandem mass spectrometry (tandem MS or MS/MS) data and introduce new approaches that will give more accurate solutions. These new approaches integrate chemical information and knowledge into a graph-theoretic framework. Two sources of chemical information that we investigate are mass tagging and dissociation chemistry in the tandem MS process itself. We describe machine learning techniques that are used to classify peaks according to ion types based on known dissociation chemistry. We describe the algorithms that are implemented in a software code called PepSUMS. Using PepSUMS, we give results on the effectiveness of the new methods on the ultimate goal of improved protein identification. Olaf M. Lubeck, Christopher M. Sewell, Sheng Gu, D. Michael Cai |
Proc. IEEE | 2 |