Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Barbara Hohlt

dblp:61/3766 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Internet of things and sensor networks · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Energy-efficient computing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet of things and sensor networks › energy management
power management
0.012004
Flexible power scheduling for sensor networks · IPSN 2004
Internet of things and sensor networks
wireless sensor network
0.012004
Flexible power scheduling for sensor networks · IPSN 2004
Energy-efficient computing › power management › low-power mode management
duty cycling
0.012004
Flexible power scheduling for sensor networks · IPSN 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.1measurement · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Network Power Scheduling for TinyOS Applications
Barbara Hohlt, Eric A. Brewer
DCOSS1
2004 Flexible power scheduling for sensor networks
abstract
We propose a distributed on-demand power-management protocol for collecting data in sensor networks. The protocol aims to reduce power consumption while supporting fluctuating demand in the network and provide local routing information and synchronicity without global control. Energy savings are achieved by powering down nodes during idle times identified through dynamic scheduling. We present a real implementation on wireless sensor nodes based on a novel, two-level architecture. We evaluate our approach through measurements and simulation, and show how the protocol allows adaptive scheduling and enables a smooth trade-off between energy savings and latency. An example current measurement shows an energy savings of 83% on an intermediate node.
Barbara Hohlt, Lance Doherty, Eric A. Brewer
IPSN1