Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yang Xu 0027
dblp:61/3906-27
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Information extraction and text analysis · 46% Deep learning architectures and training · 30% Efficient and distributed learning · 23% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Using Active Learning to Expand Training Data for Implicit Discourse Relation Recognition · EMNLP 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Using Active Learning to Expand Training Data for Implicit Discourse Relation Recognition · EMNLP 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis
discourse relation recognition |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Using Active Learning to Expand Training Data for Implicit Discourse Relation Recognition · EMNLP 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis › discourse relation recognition
implicit discourse relation recognition |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Using Active Learning to Expand Training Data for Implicit Discourse Relation Recognition · EMNLP 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Using Active Learning to Expand Training Data for Implicit Discourse Relation Recognition · EMNLP 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
convolutional neural network · 0.3active learning · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Interactively-Propagative Attention Learning for Implicit Discourse Relation RecognitionabstractWe tackle implicit discourse relation recognition.Both self-attention and interactive-attention mechanisms have been applied for attention-aware representation learning, which improves the current discourse analysis models.To take advantages of the two attention mechanisms simultaneously, we develop a propagative attention learning model using a cross-coupled two-channel network.We experiment on Penn Discourse Treebank.The test results demonstrate that our model yields substantial improvements over the baselines (BiLSTM and BERT). Huibin Ruan, Yu Hong 0001, Yang Xu 0027, Guodong Zhou 0001, Min Zhang 0005 |
COLING | 3 |
| 2019 | Hierarchical-Gate Multimodal Network for Human Communication Comprehension
Qiyuan Liu 0005, Liangqing Wu, Yang Xu 0027, Dong Zhang 0013, Shoushan Li, Guodong Zhou 0001 |
NLPCC (2) | 3 |
| 2019 | Many vs. Many Query Matching with Hierarchical BERT and Transformer
Yang Xu 0027, Qiyuan Liu 0005, Dong Zhang 0013, Shoushan Li, Guodong Zhou 0001 |
NLPCC (1) | 1 |
| 2019 | Focus-sensitive relation disambiguation for implicit discourse relation detection
Yu Hong 0001, Siyuan Ding, Yang Xu 0027, Xiaoxia Jiang, Jianmin Yao 0001, Qiaoming Zhu, Guodong Zhou 0001 |
Frontiers Comput. Sci. | 3 |
| 2018 | Incorporating Image Matching Into Knowledge Acquisition for Event-Oriented Relation RecognitionabstractEvent relation recognition is a challenging language processing task. It is required to determine the relation class of a pair of query events, such as causality, under the condition that there isn’t any reliable clue for use. We follow the traditional statistical approach in this paper, speculating the relation class of the target events based on the relation-class distributions on the similar events. There is minimal supervision used during the speculation process. In particular, we incorporate image processing into the acquisition of similar event instances, including the utilization of images for visually representing event scenes, and the use of the neural network based image matching for approximate calculation between events. We test our method on the ACE-R2 corpus and compared our model with the fully-supervised neural network models. Experimental results show that we achieve a comparable performance to CNN while slightly better than LSTM. Yu Hong 0001, Yang Xu 0027, Huibin Ruan, Bowei Zou, Jianmin Yao 0001, Guodong Zhou 0001 |
COLING | 2 |
| 2018 | Using Active Learning to Expand Training Data for Implicit Discourse Relation RecognitionabstractWe tackle discourse-level relation recognition, a problem of determining semantic relations between text spans.Implicit relation recognition is challenging due to the lack of explicit relational clues.The increasingly popular neural network techniques have been proven effective for semantic encoding, whereby widely employed to boost semantic relation discrimination.However, learning to predict semantic relations at a deep level heavily relies on a great deal of training data, but the scale of the publicly available data in this field is limited.In this paper, we follow Rutherford and Xue (2015) to expand the training data set using the corpus of explicitly-related arguments, by arbitrarily dropping the overtly presented discourse connectives.On the basis, we carry out an experiment of sampling, in which a simple active learning approach is used, so as to take the informative instances for data expansion.The goal is to verify whether the selective use of external data not only reduces the time consumption of retraining but also ensures a better system performance.Using the expanded training data, we retrain a convolutional neural network (CNN) based classifer which is a simplified version of Qin et al. (2016)'s stacking gated relation recognizer.Experimental results show that expanding the training set with small-scale carefully-selected external data yields substantial performance gain, with the improvements of about 4% for accuracy and 3.6% for F-score.This allows a weak classifier to achieve a comparable performance against the state-of-the-art systems. Yang Xu 0027, Yu Hong 0001, Huibin Ruan, Jianmin Yao 0001, Min Zhang 0005, Guodong Zhou 0001 |
EMNLP | 1 |