Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniel B. Lysak

dblp:61/4586 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Geometric modeling and processing · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Geometric modeling and processing
3d reconstruction
0.011993
Interpreting the views in an engineering drawing · CVPR 1993
Geometric modeling and processing › spatial reasoning › geometric reasoning › line drawing interpretation
engineering drawing analysis
0.011993
Interpreting the views in an engineering drawing · CVPR 1993

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

coordinate system construction · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1999 A complete system for the intelligent interpretation of engineering drawings
Pierre M. Devaux, Daniel B. Lysak, Rangachar Kasturi
Int. J. Document Anal. Recognit.2
1995 View labeling for automated interpretation of engineering drawings
Daniel B. Lysak, Pierre M. Devaux, Rangachar Kasturi
Pattern Recognit.1
1993 Interpreting the views in an engineering drawing
abstract
A method is presented for identifying the views in an engineering drawing along with their associated view points in preparation for 3D interpretation of the object shape. A formal procedure is developed for constructing a set of view-based coordinate systems that act as intermediate 2.5D coordinates to relate the 2D drawing-based coordinates to the 3D object-based coordinates. The method can accommodate auxiliary views in addition to the standard orthogonal set, and the number of views and their layout in the drawing need not be known a priori. Moderate errors in line placement and view alignment can also be accommodated.>
Daniel B. Lysak, Rangachar Kasturi
CVPR1
1990 Interpretation of line drawings with multiple views
abstract
A method for interpreting engineering drawings with multiple orthogonal views is presented. The number of views required is not fixed and can range from a minimum of two to a maximum of six using a standard drawing layout. The method call handle input views with small errors or inaccuracies and still produce a valid interpretation. The solution is based on a bottom-up approach in which candidate vertices and edges are used to generate a set of possible faces which are in turn assembled into enclosures representing the final object. All possible interpretations consistent with the input views are found, and inconsistent input views are recognized by the fact that no possible consistent interpretation can be obtained.>
Daniel B. Lysak, Rangachar Kasturi
ICPR (1)1