Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrew Huang 0002

dblp:61/6327-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Quantum computing and quantum information · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems
interactive arguments
0.912025
Parallel Repetition for Post-Quantum Arguments · FOCS 2025
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
parallel repetition
0.912025
Parallel Repetition for Post-Quantum Arguments · FOCS 2025
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum cryptography
0.912025
Parallel Repetition for Post-Quantum Arguments · FOCS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

threshold verifiers · 1.7public-coin protocol · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Uncloneable Cryptography in Linear Quantum Memory
Andrew Huang 0002, Omri Shmueli, Vinod Vaikuntanathan, Mark Zhandry
CRYPTO (5)1
2025 Parallel Repetition for Post-Quantum Arguments
abstract
In this work, we show that parallel repetition of public-coin interactive arguments reduces the soundness error at an exponential rate even in the post-quantum setting. Moreover, we generalize this result to hold for threshold verifiers, where the parallel repeated verifier accepts if and only if at least t of the executions are accepted (for some threshold t). Prior to this work, these results were known only when the cheating prover was assumed to be classical.We also prove a similar result for three-message private-coin arguments. Previously, Bostanci, Qian, Spooner, and Yuen (STOC 2024) proved such a parallel repetition result in the more general setting of quantum protocols, where the verifier and communication may be quantum. We consider only protocols where the verifier is classical, but obtain a simplified analysis, and for the more general setting of threshold verifiers.
Andrew Huang 0002, Yael Tauman Kalai
FOCS1