Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matthew P. Evett
dblp:61/6436
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 77% Programming languages and type systems · 23% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers |
High-performance computing · 61% Parallel and multicore computing · 39% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Query processing and optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements engineering and software design
model-driven engineering |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Towards Semantic-Based Object-Oriented CASE Tools · ASE 1997 |
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Towards Semantic-Based Object-Oriented CASE Tools · ASE 1997 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation
frame-based representation |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Knowledge representation on the connection machine · SC 1989 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge representation systems |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Knowledge representation on the connection machine · SC 1989 |
Programming languages and type systems › language semantics
formal semantics |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Towards Semantic-Based Object-Oriented CASE Tools · ASE 1997 |
Programming languages and type systems
language semantics |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Towards Semantic-Based Object-Oriented CASE Tools · ASE 1997 |
Parallel and multicore computing › array processor
connection machine |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Knowledge representation on the connection machine · SC 1989 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
parallel algorithm · 0.0semantic analysis · 0.0frame-based representation language · 0.0semantic networks · 0.0semantic network · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | CyberLab: An Online Virtual Laboratory Toolkit for Non-ProgrammersabstractOnline virtual laboratory is important for online science education. CyberLab is a toolkit for online virtual experiments. It is able to handle the creation, exportation, and execution of virtual experiments. We believe CyberLab is the first toolkit that allows instructors, who do not know computer programming, to create their own online virtual experiments. This paper briefly introduces the underlying model and the architecture of CyberLab. Matthew P. Evett |
ICALT | 2 |
| 2005 | Preventing overfitting in GP with canary functionsabstractOverfitting is a fundamental problem of most machine learning techniques, including genetic programming (GP). Canary functions have been introduced in the literature as a concept for preventing overfitting by automatically recognizing when it starts to occur. This paper presents a simple scheme for implementing canary functions using cross-validation. The effectiveness of this technique is demonstrated by applying it to the numeric regression problem. A list of conditions and criteria for applying this technique to other problem domains is also identified. Other strategies for dealing with overfitting in GP are discussed. Nate Foreman, Matthew P. Evett |
GECCO | 2 |
| 1999 | Modelling software quality with GP
Matthew P. Evett, Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar, Pei-der Chien, Edward B. Allen |
GECCO | 1 |
| 1997 | Towards Semantic-Based Object-Oriented CASE ToolsabstractDespite their strengths, object-oriented methods (OOMs) and their supporting CASE tools often do not produce model that are amenable to rigorous semantic analysis. This is a direct result of their loosely defined semantics. The authors outline their ongoing work on providing a semantic base for OOMs. Robert B. France, Matthew P. Evett, Emanuel S. Grant |
ASE | 2 |
| 1995 | PRA*: Massively Parallel Heuristic Search
Matthew P. Evett, James A. Hendler, Ambuj Mahanti, Dana S. Nau |
J. Parallel Distributed Comput. | 1 |
| 1994 | Parallel Knowledge Representation on the Connection Machine
Matthew P. Evett, James A. Hendler, Lee Spector |
J. Parallel Distributed Comput. | 1 |
| 1993 | Massively Parallel Support for Computationally Effective Recognition Queries
Matthew P. Evett, James A. Hendler, William A. Andersen |
AAAI | 1 |
| 1993 | Massively Parallel Support for Efficient Knowledge Representation
Matthew P. Evett, William A. Andersen, James A. Hendler |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 1989 | Knowledge representation on the connection machineabstractA primary motivation for the development of the Connection Machine (CM) was to create a vehicle for artificial intelligence research. The original design was largely based upon Fahlman's NETL machine [Fah79], the primary purpose of which was to effect large semantic networks, a paradigm of artificial intelligence. To date, however, only a small amount of AI research is being conducted on the CM. Discounting neural net and computer vision research, the amount is miniscule. The lack of AI tools for the CM is a primary cause for this dearth of research. AI researchers proposing to use the CM must first develop the necessary AI tools before beginning work on their projects. For example, there are no existing inference systems, knowledge representation packages, expert system toolkits, etc. PARKA, a pseudo-acronym for “Parallel Knowledge Representation and Association”, was developed as the prototype of one such tool: a knowledge representation system modeled on a frame-based representation language (FDL) [Tou87] paradigm. Matthew P. Evett, Lee Spector, James A. Hendler |
SC | 1 |