Daniele Turi

dblp:61/6982 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 7 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Logic in computer science · 94% Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 6%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Logic in computer science › categorical semantics
abstract syntax
0.122001
Semantics of Name and Value Passing · LICS 2001
Abstract Syntax and Variable Binding · LICS 1999
Logic in computer science
categorical semantics
0.122001
Semantics of Name and Value Passing · LICS 2001
Abstract Syntax and Variable Binding · LICS 1999
Logic in computer science
variable binding
0.122001
Semantics of Name and Value Passing · LICS 2001
Abstract Syntax and Variable Binding · LICS 1999
Logic in computer science
bisimulation
0.012001
Semantics of Name and Value Passing · LICS 2001
Logic in computer science
concurrency theory
0.012001
Semantics of Name and Value Passing · LICS 2001
Logic in computer science
process algebra
0.012001
Semantics of Name and Value Passing · LICS 2001
Logic in computer science › algebraic specification
initial algebra semantics
0.011999
Abstract Syntax and Variable Binding · LICS 1999
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics › combinatorics on words
substitutions
0.011999
Abstract Syntax and Variable Binding · LICS 1999
Logic in computer science
type theory
0.011999
Abstract Syntax and Variable Binding · LICS 1999
Logic in computer science › semantics
denotational semantics
0.011997
Towards a Mathematical Operational Semantics · LICS 1997
Logic in computer science › program semantics
operational semantics
0.011997
Towards a Mathematical Operational Semantics · LICS 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rule formats · 0.0initial-algebra/final-coalgebra semantics · 0.0variable sets · 0.0binding signature · 0.0algebra and substitution structures · 0.0distributive laws · 0.0category theory · 0.0bialgebra · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Special Issue: The First Provenance Challenge
abstract
Abstract The first Provenance Challenge was set up in order to provide a forum for the community to understand the capabilities of different provenance systems and the expressiveness of their provenance representations. To this end, a functional magnetic resonance imaging workflow was defined, which participants had to either simulate or run in order to produce some provenance representation, from which a set of identified queries had to be implemented and executed. Sixteen teams responded to the challenge, and submitted their inputs. In this paper, we present the challenge workflow and queries, and summarize the participants' contributions. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Luc Moreau 0001, Bertram Ludäscher, Ilkay Altintas, Roger S. Barga, Shawn Bowers, Steven P. Callahan, George Chin, Ben Clifford, Shirley Cohen, Sarah Cohen Boulakia, Susan B. Davidson, Ewa Deelman, Luciano A. Digiampietri, Ian T. Foster, Juliana Freire, James Frew, Joe Futrelle, Tara Gibson, Yolanda Gil, Carole A. Goble, Jennifer Golbeck, Paul Groth, David A. Holland, Jihie Kim, David Koop, Ales Krenek, Timothy M. McPhillips, Gaurang Mehta, Simon Miles, Dominic Metzger, Steve Munroe, James D. Myers, Beth Plale, Norbert Podhorszki, Varun Ratnakar, Emanuele Santos, Carlos Scheidegger, Karen Schuchardt, Margo I. Seltzer, Yogesh L. Simmhan, Cláudio T. Silva, Peter Slaughter, Eric G. Stephan, Robert Stevens 0001, Daniele Turi, Huy T. Vo, Michael Wilde, Jun Zhao 0003, Yong Zhao 0009
Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp.46
2008 Mining Taverna's semantic web of provenance
abstract
Abstract Taverna is a workflow workbench developed as part of the UK's myGrid project. Taverna's provenance model captures both internal provenance locally generated in Taverna and external provenance gathered from third‐party data providers. This model also supports overlaying secondary provenance over the primary logs and lineage. This design is motivated by the particular properties of bioinformatics data and services used in Taverna. A Semantic Web of provenance, Ouzo, is built to combine the above different provenance by means of semantic annotations. This paper shows how Ouzo can be mined by a provenance usage component, Provenance Query and Answer (ProQA). ProQA supports provenance retrievals as well as provenance abstraction, aggregation, and semantic reasoning. ProQA is implemented as a suite APIs which can be deployed as provenance services to compose system provenance workflows that analyse experiment results using the provenance records. We show how these features of Taverna's provenance support us in answering the questions from the provenance challenge workshop and a set of additional provenance queries. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Jun Zhao 0003, Carole A. Goble, Robert Stevens 0001, Daniele Turi
Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp.4
2007 Taverna Workflows: Syntax and Semantics
abstract
This paper presents the formal syntax and the operational semantics of Taverna, a workflow management system with a large user base among the e-Science community. Such formal foundation, which has so far been lacking, opens the way to the translation between Taverna workflows and other process models. In particular, the ability to automatically compile a simple domain-specific process description into Taverna facilitates its adoption by e-scientists who are not expert workflow developers. We demonstrate this potential through a practical use case.
Daniele Turi, Paolo Missier, Carole A. Goble, David De Roure, Thomas M. Oinn
eScience1
2005 The OWL Instance Store: System Description
Sean Bechhofer, Ian Horrocks 0001, Daniele Turi
CADE3
2005 A Little Semantic Web Goes a Long Way in Biology
Katy Wolstencroft, Andy Brass, Ian Horrocks 0001, Phillip Lord, Ulrike Sattler, Daniele Turi, Robert Stevens 0001
ISWC6
2001 Semantics of Name and Value Passing
abstract
Provides a semantic framework for (first-order) message-passing process calculi by combining categorical theories of abstract syntax with binding and operational semantics. In particular, we obtain abstract rule formats for name and value passing with both late and early interpretations. These formats induce an initial-algebra/final-coalgebra semantics that is compositional, respects substitution and is fully abstract for late and early congruence. We exemplify the theory with the /spl pi/-calculus and value-passing CCS (calculus of communicating systems).
Marcelo P. Fiore, Daniele Turi
LICS2
1999 Abstract Syntax and Variable Binding
abstract
We develop a theory of abstract syntax with variable binding. To every binding signature we associate a category of models consisting of variable sets endowed with compatible algebra and substitution structures. The syntax generated by the signature is the initial model. This gives a notion of initial algebra semantics encompassing the traditional one; besides compositionality, it automatically verifies the semantic substitution lemma.
Marcelo P. Fiore, Gordon D. Plotkin, Daniele Turi
LICS3
1998 On the Foundations of Final Coalgebra Semantics
Daniele Turi, Jan Rutten
Math. Struct. Comput. Sci.1
1997 Towards a Mathematical Operational Semantics
abstract
We present a categorical theory of 'well-behaved' operational semantics which aims at complementing the established theory of domains and denotational semantics to form a coherent whole. It is shown that, if the operational rules of a programming language can be modelled as a natural transformation of a suitable general form, depending on functorial notions of syntax and behaviour, then one gets the following for free: an operational model satisfying the rules and a canonical, internally fully abstract denotational model which satisfies the operational rules. The theory is based on distributive laws and bialgebras; it specialises to the known classes of well-behaved rules for structural operational semantics, such as GSOS.
Daniele Turi, Gordon D. Plotkin
LICS1
1992 A Two Steps Semantics for Logic Programs with Negation
Maurizio Gabbrielli, Giorgio Levi, Daniele Turi
LPAR3
1991 Extending S-Models to Logic Programs with Negation
Daniele Turi
ICLP1