Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David Talavera
dblp:61/7042
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
0000-0002-8820-3931ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 3 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein function prediction › sequence-based protein function prediction
homology-based function transfer |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | WSsas: a web service for the annotation of functional residues through structural homologues · Bioinform. 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein function prediction |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | WSsas: a web service for the annotation of functional residues through structural homologues · Bioinform. 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
structural bioinformatics |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | WSsas: a web service for the annotation of functional residues through structural homologues · Bioinform. 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
similarity search · 0.1pairwise alignment · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | WSsas: a web service for the annotation of functional residues through structural homologuesabstractMOTIVATION: Annotation tools help scientists to traverse the gap between characterized and uncharacterized proteins. Tools for the prediction of protein function include those which predict the function of entire proteins or complexes, those annotating functional domains and those which predict specific residues within the domain. We have developed WSsas, a web service focused on the annotation of essential functional residues. WSsas uses similarity searches and pairwise alignments to transfer functional information about binding, catalytic and protein-protein interaction residues from solved structures to query sequences. In addition, WSsas can supply information about the relevant functional atoms. The web service definition (WSDL) file and a Perl client are freely available at http://www.ebi.ac.uk/thornton-srv/databases/WSsas/. David Talavera, Roman A. Laskowski, Janet M. Thornton |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2007 | A procedure for identifying homologous alternative splicing eventsabstractBACKGROUND: The study of the functional role of alternative splice isoforms of a gene is a very active area of research in biology. The difficulty of the experimental approach (in particular, in its high-throughput version) leaves ample room for the development of bioinformatics tools that can provide a useful first picture of the problem. Among the possible approaches, one of the simplest is to follow classical protein function annotation protocols and annotate target alternative splice events with the information available from conserved events in other species. However, the application of this protocol requires a procedure capable of recognising such events. Here we present a simple but accurate method developed for this purpose. RESULTS: We have developed a method for identifying homologous, or equivalent, alternative splicing events, based on the combined use of neural networks and sequence searches. The procedure comprises four steps: (i) BLAST search for homologues of the two isoforms defining the target alternative splicing event; (ii) construction of all possible candidate events; (iii) scoring of the latter with a series of neural networks; and (iv) filtering of the results. When tested in a set of 473 manually annotated pairs of homologous events, our method showed a good performance, with an accuracy of 0.99, a precision of 0.98 and a sensitivity of 0.93. When no candidates were available, the specificity of our method varied between 0.81 and 0.91. CONCLUSION: The method described in this article allows the identification of homologous alternative splicing events, with a good success rate, indicating that such method could be used for the development of functional annotation of alternative splice isoforms. David Talavera, Adam Hospital, Modesto Orozco, Xavier de la Cruz |
BMC Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2007 | The (In)dependence of Alternative Splicing and Gene DuplicationabstractAlternative splicing (AS) and gene duplication (GD) both are processes that diversify the protein repertoire. Recent examples have shown that sequence changes introduced by AS may be comparable to those introduced by GD. In addition, the two processes are inversely correlated at the genomic scale: large gene families are depleted in splice variants and vice versa. All together, these data strongly suggest that both phenomena result in interchangeability between their effects. Here, we tested the extent to which this applies with respect to various protein characteristics. The amounts of AS and GD per gene are anticorrelated even when accounting for different gene functions or degrees of sequence divergence. In contrast, the two processes appear to be independent in their influence on variation in mRNA expression. Further, we conducted a detailed comparison of the effect of sequence changes in both alternative splice variants and gene duplicates on protein structure, in particular the size, location, and types of sequence substitutions and insertions/deletions. We find that, in general, alternative splicing affects protein sequence and structure in a more drastic way than gene duplication and subsequent divergence. Our results reveal an interesting paradox between the anticorrelation of AS and GD at the genomic level, and their impact at the protein level, which shows little or no equivalence in terms of effects on protein sequence, structure, and function. We discuss possible explanations that relate to the order of appearance of AS and GD in a gene family, and to the selection pressure imposed by the environment. David Talavera, Christine Vogel, Modesto Orozco, Sarah A. Teichmann, Xavier de la Cruz |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 1 |