Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

JinLong Zhang

dblp:61/714 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
0000-0002-1161-5460ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information theory › signal processing
blind source separation
0.112008
Source number estimation and separation algorithms of underdetermined blind separation · Sci. China Ser. F Inf. Sci. 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

underdetermined blind separation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Source number estimation and separation algorithms of underdetermined blind separation
ZuYuan Yang, BeiHai Tan, GuoXu Zhou, JinLong Zhang
Sci. China Ser. F Inf. Sci.4
2002 Dynamic conflict analysis by integrating value-focused thinking and the graph model for conflict resolution
abstract
A new approach to dynamic conflict analysis is presented that integrates value-focused thinking and the graph model for conflict resolution. This approach is based on the premise that values are the driving forces behind the evolution of a conflict from one frame to another. Value-focused thinking is employed to identify the decision makers' values and objectives, which facilitate the establishment of a conflict model consisting of decision makers as well as each decision maker's options and preference rankings of states for each frame. A decision support system called GMCR II is utilized to analyze the conflict model and predict possible resolutions for each frame, which are assessed against the measures established from value-focused thinking for evaluating the achievement of objectives. A case study is presented to illustrate how the approach can be applied to a real world conflict.
Liping Fang, Keith W. Hipel, JinLong Zhang
SMC (2)3