Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Neta Ezer

dblp:61/7180 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 50% Robot manipulation · 25% Time series and sequential data · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation
learning from demonstration
0.712023
Learning From Sparse Demonstrations · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
objective function learning
0.712023
Learning From Sparse Demonstrations · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
time warping
0.712023
Learning From Sparse Demonstrations · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization
0.712023
Learning From Sparse Demonstrations · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

projected gradient descent · 0.7pontryagin differentiable programming · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Learning From Sparse Demonstrations
abstract
In this article, we develop the method of continuous Pontryagin differentiable programming (Continuous PDP), which enables a robot to learn an objective function from a few sparsely demonstrated keyframes. The keyframes, labeled with some time stamps, are the desired task-space outputs, which a robot is expected to follow sequentially. The time stamps of the keyframes can be different from the time of the robot's actual execution. The method jointly finds an objective function and a time-warping function such that the robot's resulting trajectory sequentially follows the keyframes with minimal discrepancy loss. The Continuous PDP minimizes the discrepancy loss using projected gradient descent by efficiently solving the gradient of the robot trajectory with respect to the unknown parameters. The method is first evaluated on a simulated robot arm and then applied to a 6-DoF quadrotor to learn an objective function for motion planning in unmodeled environments. The results show the efficiency of the method, its ability to handle time misalignment between keyframes and robot execution, and the generalization of objective learning into unseen motion conditions.
Wanxin Jin, Todd D. Murphey, Dana Kulic, Neta Ezer, Shaoshuai Mou
IEEE Trans. Robotics4
2009 Designing Together While Apart: The Role of Computer-Mediated Communication and Collaborative Virtual Environments on Design Collaboration
abstract
This paper presents an empirical study of two student pairs collaborating on two small products design session in both face-to-face and distributed settings while using computer-mediated communication (CMC) technologies and a collaborative virtual environment (CVE). To gain insight about the way designers communicate and collaborate, the observation focused on how much time the students worked together and individually in the design process. The study shows that teams worked together more in the distributed setting than in the face-to-face setting. In the post-test questionnaires, participants reported that they found the distributed setting a more engaging environment to work with teammates. Findings of the study suggest plausible design criteria for a communication system for distributed collaboration that supports interaction and sharing design information.
Seunghyun Tina Lee, Neta Ezer, Jon A. Sanford, Ellen Yi-Luen Do
SMC2