Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Harald Holz

dblp:62/1301 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Requirements engineering and software design · 36% Empirical software engineering · 32% Software maintenance and evolution · 32%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering › developer studies › developer behavior
developer information needs
0.012003
An Incremental Approach to Task-Specific Information Delivery in SE Processe · ASE 2003
Software maintenance and evolution
recommendation system for software engineering
0.012003
An Incremental Approach to Task-Specific Information Delivery in SE Processe · ASE 2003
Requirements engineering and software design
software process
0.011999
Software Process Support over the Internet · ICSE 1999
Requirements engineering and software design › software process
software process modeling
0.011999
Software Process Support over the Internet · ICSE 1999
Distributed systems
distributed coordination
0.011999
Software Process Support over the Internet · ICSE 1999

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

workflow engine · 0.0traceability · 0.0formal specification language · 0.0collaborative filtering · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Task-based process know-how reuse and proactive information delivery in TaskNavigator
abstract
Knowledge management approaches for weakly-structured, adhoc knowledge work processes need to be lightweight, i.e., they cannot rely on high upfront modeling efforts. This paper presents TaskNavigator, a novel prototype to support weakly-structured processes by integrating a standard task list application with a state-of-the-art document classification system. The resulting system allows for a task-oriented view on office workers' personal knowledge spaces in order to realize a proactive and contextsensitive information support during daily, knowledge-intensive tasks. Moreover, TaskNavigator supports process know-how reuse by proactively suggesting similar tasks or relevant process models, based on textual similarities. Finally, we report on a feasibility test and a case study that have been conducted in order to evaluate the system in the context of daily research task management and software requirements analysis.
Harald Holz, Oleg Rostanin, Andreas Dengel 0001, Takeshi Suzuki, Kaoru Maeda, Katsumi Kanasaki
CIKM1
2003 An Incremental Approach to Task-Specific Information Delivery in SE Processe
abstract
In this paper, we present a system to proactively provide software process participants with information items that are available and relevant in the context of their current tasks. Knowledge on which items to offer is obtained in two ways. First, situation-specific information needs that arise for participants are captured, together with the information sources that are accessed to satisfy them. These are recommended to other participants in similar situations using collaborative filtering techniques. Second, to allow for more systematic recommendation functionality, a formal language is provided to specify preconditions on when to offer certain information items. The resulting hybrid system thus supports an incremental phase-in of knowledge management techniques into an organization, allowing the organization to decide how much effort to spend on knowledge engineering.
Harald Holz
ASE1
2003 Knowledge Management for Project Planning and Enactment in Software Engineering
Sigrid Goldmann, Harald Holz, Michael M. Richter
SEKE2
2000 Distributed Process Planning Support with MILOS
abstract
Software development processes are highly creative, and therefore prone to change frequently. Also, recent developments show that most software projects require knowledge and skills in a lot of areas. Since the necessary expertise often cannot be found at one development site, the necessity arises to distribute projects among several sites, or form "virtual" corporations, where software development is shared between several companies. The first point makes it necessary to support changes by identifying and notifying the people affected by a change. The second point emphasizes this necessity, while also complicating project planning and management: changes in one development site or company might necessitate replanning in several locations. In this paper, we introduce the MILOS approach, which provides concepts to integrate process modeling, planning, scheduling and enactment in one system. Thus dynamic plan changes, as well as automated feedback from execution to the project plan can be supported.
Sigrid Goldmann, Jürgen Münch, Harald Holz
Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng.3
1999 Software Process Support over the Internet
abstract
The MILOS system supports software development processes over the Internet.It integrates process modeling with project planning and enactment.Our flexible workflow engine allows refining and changing process models during project execution, The built-in traceability component supports change notifications and helps the project participants to ensure that the project plan as well as the state of the enactment engine reflect the "real world development process.Tool integration is accomplished by using the built-in capabilities of Web browsers.
Frank Maurer, Giancarlo Succi, Harald Holz, Boris Kötting, Sigrid Goldmann, Barbara Dellen
ICSE3