Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gang Li 0048
dblp:62/2655-48
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0000-6787-2792ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 36% Trustworthy machine learning · 25% Language models and text generation · 12% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 87% Recommender systems · 13% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
group relative policy optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | DisCO: Reinforcing Large Reasoning Models with Discriminative Constrained Optimization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
large reasoning model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | DisCO: Reinforcing Large Reasoning Models with Discriminative Constrained Optimization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | DisCO: Reinforcing Large Reasoning Models with Discriminative Constrained Optimization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning for reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | DisCO: Reinforcing Large Reasoning Models with Discriminative Constrained Optimization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Maximization of Average Precision for Deep Learning with Adversarial Ranking Robustness · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › deep learning systems
deep learning framework |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | LibAUC: A Deep Learning Library for X-Risk Optimization · KDD 2023 |
Information retrieval › ranking › ranking optimization
average precision optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Maximization of Average Precision for Deep Learning with Adversarial Ranking Robustness · NeurIPS 2023 |
Information retrieval
ranking |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Maximization of Average Precision for Deep Learning with Adversarial Ranking Robustness · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distributionally robust optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | When AUC meets DRO: Optimizing Partial AUC for Deep Learning with Non-Convex Convergence Guarantee · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › ranking › AUC optimization
partial AUC maximization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | When AUC meets DRO: Optimizing Partial AUC for Deep Learning with Non-Convex Convergence Guarantee · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
robust learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | When AUC meets DRO: Optimizing Partial AUC for Deep Learning with Non-Convex Convergence Guarantee · ICML 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
compositional optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Multi-block-Single-probe Variance Reduced Estimator for Coupled Compositional Optimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Multi-block-Single-probe Variance Reduced Estimator for Coupled Compositional Optimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
variance reduction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Multi-block-Single-probe Variance Reduced Estimator for Coupled Compositional Optimization · NeurIPS 2022 |
Recommender systems › representation learning for recommendation
contrastive learning for recommendation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | LibAUC: A Deep Learning Library for X-Risk Optimization · KDD 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic optimization · 2.6surrogate loss · 1.3mini-batch optimization · 1.3adversarial training · 1.3non-clipping surrogate objectives · 0.9discriminative constrained optimization · 0.9KL divergence constraint · 0.9variance reduction · 0.6gradient-based optimization · 0.6distributionally robust optimization · 0.6conditional value-at-risk · 0.6STORM · 0.6SPIDER · 0.6SARAH · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | DisCO: Reinforcing Large Reasoning Models with Discriminative Constrained OptimizationabstractThe recent success and openness of DeepSeek-R1 have brought widespread attention to Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) as a reinforcement learning method for large reasoning models (LRMs). In this work, we analyze the GRPO objective under a binary reward setting and reveal an inherent limitation of question-level difficulty bias arising from its group relative advantage function. We also identify a connection between GRPO and traditional discriminative methods in supervised learning. Motivated by these insights, we introduce a new **Discriminative Constrained Optimization (DisCO)** framework for reinforcing LRMs, grounded in the principle of discriminative learning: increasing the scores of positive answers while decreasing those of negative ones. The main differences between DisCO and GRPO and its recent variants are: (1) it replaces the group relative objective with a discriminative objective defined by a scoring function; (2) it abandons clipping-based surrogates in favor of non-clipping RL surrogate objectives used as scoring functions; (3) it employs a simple yet effective constrained optimization approach to enforce the KL divergence constraint. As a result, DisCO offers notable advantages over GRPO and its variants: (i) it completely eliminates difficulty bias by adopting discriminative objectives; (ii) it addresses the entropy instability in GRPO and its variants through the use of non-clipping scoring functions and a constrained optimization approach, yielding long and stable training dynamics; (iii) it allows the incorporation of advanced discriminative learning techniques to address data imbalance, where a significant number of questions have more negative than positive generated answers during training. Our experiments on enhancing the mathematical reasoning capabilities of SFT-finetuned models show that DisCO significantly outperforms GRPO and its improved variants such as DAPO, achieving average gains of 7\% over GRPO and 6\% over DAPO across six benchmark tasks for a 1.5B model. Gang Li 0048, Ming Lin 0002, Tomer Galanti, Zhengzhong Tu, Tianbao Yang |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | LibAUC: A Deep Learning Library for X-Risk OptimizationabstractThis paper introduces the award-winning deep learning (DL) library called LibAUC for implementing state-of-the-art algorithms towards optimizing a family of risk functions named X-risks. X-risks refer to a family of compositional functions in which the loss function of each data point is defined in a way that contrasts the data point with a large number of others. They have broad applications in AI for solving classical and emerging problems, including but not limited to classification for imbalanced data (CID), learning to rank (LTR), and contrastive learning of representations (CLR). The motivation of developing LibAUC is to address the convergence issues of existing libraries for solving these problems. In particular, existing libraries may not converge or require very large mini-batch sizes in order to attain good performance for these problems, due to the usage of the standard mini-batch technique in the empirical risk minimization (ERM) framework. Our library is for deep X-risk optimization (DXO) that has achieved great success in solving a variety of tasks for CID, LTR and CLR. The contributions of this paper include: (1) It introduces a new mini-batch based pipeline for implementing DXO algorithms, which differs from existing DL pipeline in the design of controlled data samplers and dynamic mini-batch losses; (2) It provides extensive benchmarking experiments for ablation studies and comparison with existing libraries. The LibAUC library features scalable performance for millions of items to be contrasted, faster and better convergence than existing libraries for optimizing X-risks, seamless PyTorch deployment and versatile APIs for various loss optimization. Our library is available to the open source community at https://github.com/Optimization-AI/LibAUC, to facilitate further academic research and industrial applications. Zhuoning Yuan, Dixian Zhu, Zi-Hao Qiu, Gang Li 0048, Xuanhui Wang, Tianbao Yang |
KDD | 4 |
| 2023 | Maximization of Average Precision for Deep Learning with Adversarial Ranking RobustnessabstractThis paper seeks to address a gap in optimizing Average Precision (AP) while ensuring adversarial robustness, an area that has not been extensively explored to the best of our knowledge. AP maximization for deep learning has widespread applications, particularly when there is a significant imbalance between positive and negative examples. Although numerous studies have been conducted on adversarial training, they primarily focus on robustness concerning accuracy, ensuring that the average accuracy on adversarially perturbed examples is well maintained. However, this type of adversarial robustness is insufficient for many applications, as minor perturbations on a single example can significantly impact AP while not greatly influencing the accuracy of the prediction system. To tackle this issue, we introduce a novel formulation that combines an AP surrogate loss with a regularization term representing adversarial ranking robustness, which maintains the consistency between ranking of clean data and that of perturbed data. We then devise an efficient stochastic optimization algorithm to optimize the resulting objective. Our empirical studies, which compare our method to current leading adversarial training baselines and other robust AP maximization strategies, demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. Notably, our methods outperform a state-of-the-art method (TRADES) by more than 4\% in terms of robust AP against PGD attacks while achieving 7\% higher AP on clean data simultaneously on CIFAR10 and CIFAR100.The code is available at: <https://github.com/GangLii/Adversarial-AP> Gang Li 0048, Tianbao Yang |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | When AUC meets DRO: Optimizing Partial AUC for Deep Learning with Non-Convex Convergence GuaranteeabstractIn this paper, we propose systematic and efficient gradient-based methods for both one-way and two-way partial AUC (pAUC) maximization that are applicable to deep learning. We propose new formulations of pAUC surrogate objectives by using the distributionally robust optimization (DRO) to define the loss for each individual positive data. We consider two formulations of DRO, one of which is based on conditional-value-at-risk (CVaR) that yields a non-smooth but exact estimator for pAUC, and another one is based on a KL divergence regularized DRO that yields an inexact but smooth (soft) estimator for pAUC. For both one-way and two-way pAUC maximization, we propose two algorithms and prove their convergence for optimizing their two formulations, respectively. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms for pAUC maximization for deep learning on various datasets. Dixian Zhu, Gang Li 0048, Bokun Wang, Tianbao Yang |
ICML | 2 |
| 2022 | Multi-block-Single-probe Variance Reduced Estimator for Coupled Compositional OptimizationabstractVariance reduction techniques such as SPIDER/SARAH/STORM have been extensively studied to improve the convergence rates of stochastic non-convex optimization, which usually maintain and update a sequence of estimators for a single function across iterations. What if we need to track multiple functional mappings across iterations but only with access to stochastic samples of $\mathcal{O}(1)$ functional mappings at each iteration? There is an important application in solving an emerging family of coupled compositional optimization problems in the form of $\sum_{i=1}^m f_i(g_i(\mathbf{w}))$, where $g_i$ is accessible through a stochastic oracle. The key issue is to track and estimate a sequence of $\mathbf g(\mathbf{w})=(g_1(\mathbf{w}), \ldots, g_m(\mathbf{w}))$ across iterations, where $\mathbf g(\mathbf{w})$ has $m$ blocks and it is only allowed to probe $\mathcal{O}(1)$ blocks to attain their stochastic values and Jacobians. To improve the complexity for solving these problems, we propose a novel stochastic method named Multi-block-Single-probe Variance Reduced (MSVR) estimator to track the sequence of $\mathbf g(\mathbf{w})$. It is inspired by STORM but introduces a customized error correction term to alleviate the noise not only in stochastic samples for the selected blocks but also in those blocks that are not sampled. With the help of the MSVR estimator, we develop several algorithms for solving the aforementioned compositional problems with improved complexities across a spectrum of settings with non-convex/convex/strongly convex/Polyak-Lojasiewicz (PL) objectives. Our results improve upon prior ones in several aspects, including the order of sample complexities and dependence on the strong convexity parameter. Empirical studies on multi-task deep AUC maximization demonstrate the better performance of using the new estimator. Wei Jiang 0029, Gang Li 0048, Yibo Wang 0005, Lijun Zhang 0005, Tianbao Yang |
NeurIPS | 2 |