Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Manu De Backer
dblp:62/3377
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
0000-0002-7130-8278ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 6 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Services computing and microservices · 50% Software maintenance and evolution · 50% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Services computing and microservices
business process management |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Verification of Change in a Fragmented Event-Based Process Coordination Environment · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2014 |
Software maintenance and evolution
software evolution |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Verification of Change in a Fragmented Event-Based Process Coordination Environment · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
state reconstruction · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | To tune or not to tune: rule evaluation for metaheuristic-based sequential covering algorithms
Bart Minnaert, David Martens, Manu De Backer, Bart Baesens |
Data Min. Knowl. Discov. | 3 |
| 2014 | Process fragmentation, distribution and execution using an event-based interaction scheme
Pieter Hens, Monique Snoeck, Geert Poels, Manu De Backer |
J. Syst. Softw. | 4 |
| 2014 | Verification of Change in a Fragmented Event-Based Process Coordination EnvironmentabstractTo allow the distribution of control and visibility of cross-organizational process models and to increase availability and performance of the processes, a process model can be fragmented into logically different parts and distributed in the enterprise architecture. Fragmentation algorithms and execution environments that connect the fragmented process model parts together, recreating the original process execution semantics, have been proposed in earlier works. However, a critical challenge that is left open is the ability to independently change the control structure of a process fragment. This is not trivial as changing the control structure of a specific fragment could break the global process execution. The global process overview is also not available anymore because it is fragmented in the enactment environment and many independent control structure changes could have already been done. In this paper, we describe an approach based on state reconstruction, which enables checking the admissibility of changes made to the control structure of a process fragment in a fragmented event-based process enactment environment. Pieter Hens, Monique Snoeck, Manu De Backer, Geert Poels |
IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. | 3 |
| 2013 | Choosing the right business process maturity model
Amy Van Looy, Manu De Backer, Geert Poels, Monique Snoeck |
Inf. Manag. | 2 |
| 2012 | A multi-dimensional quality assessment of state-of-the-art process discovery algorithms using real-life event logs
Jochen De Weerdt, Manu De Backer, Jan Vanthienen, Bart Baesens |
Inf. Syst. | 2 |
| 2011 | A robust F-measure for evaluating discovered process modelsabstractWithin process mining research, one of the most important fields of study is process discovery, which can be defined as the extraction of control-flow models from audit trails or information system event logs. The evaluation of discovered process models is an essential but difficult task for any process discovery analysis. With this paper, we propose a novel approach for evaluating discovered process models based on artificially generated negative events. This approach allows for the definition of a behavioral F-measure for discovered process models, which is the main contribution of this paper. Jochen De Weerdt, Manu De Backer, Jan Vanthienen, Bart Baesens |
CIDM | 2 |
| 2009 | A scenario-based verification technique to assess the compatibility of collaborative business processes
Manu De Backer, Monique Snoeck, Geert Monsieur, Wilfried Lemahieu, Guido Dedene |
Data Knowl. Eng. | 1 |
| 2009 | Inferring comprehensible business/ICT alignment rules
Bjorn Cumps, David Martens, Manu De Backer, Raf Haesen, Stijn Viaene, Guido Dedene, Bart Baesens, Monique Snoeck |
Inf. Manag. | 3 |
| 2008 | Mining software repositories for comprehensible software fault prediction models
Olivier Vandecruys, David Martens, Bart Baesens, Christophe Mues, Manu De Backer, Raf Haesen |
J. Syst. Softw. | 5 |
| 2007 | Classification With Ant Colony OptimizationabstractAnt colony optimization (ACO) can be applied to the data mining field to extract rule-based classifiers. The aim of this paper is twofold. On the one hand, we provide an overview of previous ant-based approaches to the classification task and compare them with state-of-the-art classification techniques, such as C4.5, RIPPER, and support vector machines in a benchmark study. On the other hand, a new ant-based classification technique is proposed, named AntMiner+. The key differences between the proposed AntMiner+ and previous AntMiner versions are the usage of the better performing MAX-MIN ant system, a clearly defined and augmented environment for the ants to walk through, with the inclusion of the class variable to handle multiclass problems, and the ability to include interval rules in the rule list. Furthermore, the commonly encountered problem in ACO of setting system parameters is dealt with in an automated, dynamic manner. Our benchmarking experiments show an AntMiner+ accuracy that is superior to that obtained by the other AntMiner versions, and competitive or better than the results achieved by the compared classification techniques. David Martens, Manu De Backer, Raf Haesen, Jan Vanthienen, Monique Snoeck, Bart Baesens |
IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. | 2 |