Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yu Sun 0020
dblp:62/3689-20
· DBLP profile ↗
15ranked-venue papers
2as first author
8since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 14 · 2 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
10 papers |
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 32% Generative modeling · 16% Deep learning architectures and training · 16% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Information retrieval · 50% Data mining · 32% Machine learning and data management · 18% |
Topics — the 23 heaviest of 25, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › test-time adaptation
test-time training |
3.5 | 5 | 2025 | Test-Time Training on Video Streams · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 Learning to (Learn at Test Time): RNNs with Expressive Hidden States · ICML 2025 Test-Time Training on Nearest Neighbors for Large Language Models · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
sequence modeling |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | Learning to (Learn at Test Time): RNNs with Expressive Hidden States · ICML 2025 One-Minute Video Generation with Test-Time Training · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › video generation
long video generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | One-Minute Video Generation with Test-Time Training · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
video generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | One-Minute Video Generation with Test-Time Training · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
video segmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Test-Time Training on Video Streams · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented language models |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Test-Time Training on Nearest Neighbors for Large Language Models · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning
masked autoencoder |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Test-Time Training with Masked Autoencoders · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy adaptation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Self-Supervised Policy Adaptation during Deployment · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Test-Time Training with Self-Supervision for Generalization under Distribution Shifts · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
test-time adaptation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Test-Time Training with Self-Supervision for Generalization under Distribution Shifts · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
confidence calibration |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
neural network calibration |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
temperature scaling |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › video generation
text-to-video generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | One-Minute Video Generation with Test-Time Training · CVPR 2025 |
Information retrieval › similarity measure
document similarity |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Supervised Word Mover's Distance · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning and data management
metric learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Supervised Word Mover's Distance · NIPS 2016 |
Information retrieval › similarity search
nearest neighbor search |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Test-Time Training on Nearest Neighbors for Large Language Models · ICLR 2024 |
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › instance-based learning
k-nearest neighbor |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | From Word Embeddings To Document Distances · ICML 2015 |
Data mining › text mining
text classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | From Word Embeddings To Document Distances · ICML 2015 |
Information retrieval › similarity measure
word mover's distance |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | From Word Embeddings To Document Distances · ICML 2015 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification › nonparametric classification
nearest neighbor classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Supervised Word Mover's Distance · NIPS 2016 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Supervised Word Mover's Distance · NIPS 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-supervised learning · 2.8text embedding · 1.5fine-tuning · 1.5distributed index · 1.5transformer · 0.9test-time training · 0.9online test-time training · 0.9mamba layers · 0.9linear attention · 0.9bias-variance trade-off · 0.6word embeddings · 0.5optimal transport · 0.2linear transformation · 0.2earth mover's distance · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | UltraSeP: Sequence-aware pre-training for echocardiography probe movement guidance
Haojun Jiang, Zhenguo Sun, Yulin Wang 0002, Yu Sun 0020, Meng Li 0087, Shaqi Luo, Shiji Song, Gao Huang 0001 |
Pattern Recognit. | 6 |
| 2025 | One-Minute Video Generation with Test-Time TrainingabstractTransformers today still struggle to generate one-minute videos because self-attention layers are inefficient for long context. Alternatives such as Mamba layers struggle to produce coherent scenes because their hidden states are small and less expressive. We experiment with Test-Time Training (TTT) layers, whose hidden states themselves can be neural networks, therefore larger and more expressive. Adding TTT layers into a pre-trained Transformer enables it to generate one-minute videos from text storyboards. We curate a dataset based on Tom and Jerry cartoons as a proof-of-concept benchmark. Compared to baselines such as Mamba 2, Gated DeltaNet, and sliding-window attention layers, TTT layers generate much more coherent videos that tell complete stories, leading by 34 Elo points in a human evaluation of 100 videos per method. Although promising, our results are still limited in physical realism, and the efficiency of our implementation can be further improved.Sample videos, code and annotations are available at: https://test-time-training.github.io/video-dit Karan Dalal, Daniel Koceja, Yue Zhao 0006, Shihao Han, Ka Chun Cheung, Jan Kautz, Yejin Choi 0001, Yu Sun 0020, Xiaolong Wang 0004 |
CVPR | 9 |
| 2025 | Learning to (Learn at Test Time): RNNs with Expressive Hidden StatesabstractSelf-attention performs well in long context but has quadratic complexity. Existing RNN layers have linear complexity, but their performance in long context is limited by the expressive power of their hidden states. We present a practical framework for instantiating sequence modeling layers with linear complexity and expressive hidden states. The key idea is to make the hidden state a machine learning model itself, and the update rule a step of self-supervised learning. Since the hidden state is updated by training even on test sequences, our layers are called Test-Time Training (TTT) layers. We consider two instantiations: TTT-Linear and TTT-MLP, whose hidden state is a linear model and a two-layer MLP respectively. We evaluate our instantiations at the scale of 125M to 1.3B parameters, comparing with a strong Transformer and Mamba, a modern RNN. Similar to Transformer, TTT-Linear and TTT-MLP can keep reducing perplexity by conditioning on more tokens, while Mamba cannot after 16k context. TTT-MLP still faces challenges in memory I/O, but shows larger potential in long context, pointing to a promising direction for future research. Yu Sun 0020, Karan Dalal, Arjun Vikram, Genghan Zhang, Yann Dubois, Xinlei Chen, Xiaolong Wang 0004, Oluwasanmi Koyejo, Tatsunori B. Hashimoto, Carlos Guestrin |
ICML | 1 |
| 2025 | Test-Time Training on Video StreamsabstractPrior work has established Test-Time Training (TTT) as a general framework to further improve a trained model at test time. Before making a prediction on each test instance, the model is first trained on the same instance using a self-supervised task such as reconstruction. We extend TTT to the streaming setting, where multiple test instances - video frames in our case - arrive in temporal order. Our extension is online TTT: The current model is initialized from the previous model, then trained on the current frame and a small window of frames immediately before. Online TTT significantly outperforms the fixed-model baseline for four tasks, on three real-world datasets. The improvements are more than 2.2x and 1.5x for instance and panoptic segmentation. Surprisingly, online TTT also outperforms its offline variant that accesses strictly more information, training on all frames from the entire test video regardless of temporal order. This finding challenges those in prior work using synthetic videos. We formalize a notion of locality as the advantage of online over offline TTT, and analyze its role with ablations and a theory based on bias-variance trade-off. Renhao Wang, Yu Sun 0020, Arnuv Tandon, Yossi Gandelsman, Xinlei Chen, Alexei A. Efros, Xiaolong Wang 0004 |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2024 | Test-Time Training on Nearest Neighbors for Large Language ModelsabstractMany recent efforts augment language models with retrieval, by adding retrieved data to the input context. For this approach to succeed, the retrieved data must be added at both training and test time. Moreover, as input length grows linearly with the size of retrieved data, cost in computation and memory grows quadratically for modern Transformers. To avoid these complications, we simply fine-tune the model on retrieved data at test time, using its standard training setup. We build a large-scale distributed index based on text embeddings of the Pile dataset. For each test input, our system retrieves its neighbors and fine-tunes the model on their text. Surprisingly, retrieving and training on as few as 20 neighbors, each for only one gradient iteration, drastically improves performance across more than 20 language modeling tasks in the Pile. For example, test-time training with nearest neighbors significantly narrows the performance gap between a small GPT-2 and a GPT-Neo model more than 10 times larger. Sufficient index quality and size, however, are necessary. Our work establishes a first baseline of test-time training for language modeling. Moritz Hardt, Yu Sun 0020 |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2024 | Cardiac Copilot: Automatic Probe Guidance for Echocardiography with World Model
Haojun Jiang, Zhenguo Sun, Meng Li 0087, Yu Sun 0020, Shaqi Luo, Shiji Song, Gao Huang 0001 |
MICCAI (1) | 5 |
| 2022 | Test-Time Training with Masked AutoencodersabstractTest-time training adapts to a new test distribution on the fly by optimizing a model for each test input using self-supervision.In this paper, we use masked autoencoders for this one-sample learning problem.Empirically, our simple method improves generalization on many visual benchmarks for distribution shifts.Theoretically, we characterize this improvement in terms of the bias-variance trade-off. Yossi Gandelsman, Yu Sun 0020, Xinlei Chen, Alexei A. Efros |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2021 | Self-Supervised Policy Adaptation during Deployment
Nicklas Hansen 0001, Rishabh Jangir, Yu Sun 0020, Guillem Alenyà, Pieter Abbeel, Alexei A. Efros, Lerrel Pinto, Xiaolong Wang 0004 |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2020 | Test-Time Training with Self-Supervision for Generalization under Distribution ShiftsabstractIn this paper, we propose Test-Time Training, a general approach for improving the performance of predictive models when training and test data come from different distributions. We turn a single unlabeled test sample into a self-supervised learning problem, on which we update the model parameters before making a prediction. This also extends naturally to data in an online stream. Our simple approach leads to improvements on diverse image classification benchmarks aimed at evaluating robustness to distribution shifts. Yu Sun 0020, Xiaolong Wang 0004, Zhuang Liu 0003, John Miller 0001, Alexei A. Efros, Moritz Hardt |
ICML | 1 |
| 2018 | Adversarial Deep Averaging Networks for Cross-Lingual Sentiment ClassificationabstractIn recent years great success has been achieved in sentiment classification for English, thanks in part to the availability of copious annotated resources. Unfortunately, most languages do not enjoy such an abundance of labeled data. To tackle the sentiment classification problem in low-resource languages without adequate annotated data, we propose an Adversarial Deep Averaging Network (ADAN 1 ) to transfer the knowledge learned from labeled data on a resource-rich source language to low-resource languages where only unlabeled data exist. ADAN has two discriminative branches: a sentiment classifier and an adversarial language discriminator. Both branches take input from a shared feature extractor to learn hidden representations that are simultaneously indicative for the classification task and invariant across languages. Experiments on Chinese and Arabic sentiment classification demonstrate that ADAN significantly outperforms state-of-the-art systems. Xilun Chen 0002, Yu Sun 0020, Ben Athiwaratkun, Claire Cardie, Kilian Q. Weinberger |
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics | 2 |
| 2017 | On Calibration of Modern Neural NetworksabstractConfidence calibration – the problem of predicting probability estimates representative of the true correctness likelihood – is important for classification models in many applications. We discover that modern neural networks, unlike those from a decade ago, are poorly calibrated. Through extensive experiments, we observe that depth, width, weight decay, and Batch Normalization are important factors influencing calibration. We evaluate the performance of various post-processing calibration methods on state-of-the-art architectures with image and document classification datasets. Our analysis and experiments not only offer insights into neural network learning, but also provide a simple and straightforward recipe for practical settings: on most datasets, temperature scaling – a single-parameter variant of Platt Scaling – is surprisingly effective at calibrating predictions. Chuan Guo 0001, Geoff Pleiss, Yu Sun 0020, Kilian Q. Weinberger |
ICML | 3 |
| 2016 | Private Causal InferenceabstractCausal inference deals with identifying which random variables ”cause” or control other random variables. Recent advances on the topic of causal inference based on tools from statistical estimation and machine learning have resulted in practical algorithms for causal inference. Causal inference has the potential to have significant impact on medical research, prevention and control of diseases, and identifying factors that impact economic changes to name just a few. However, these promising applications for causal inference are often ones that involve sensitive or personal data of users that need to be kept private (e.g., medical records, personal finances, etc). Therefore, there is a need for the development of causal inference methods that preserve data privacy. We study the problem of inferring causality using the current, popular causal inference framework, the additive noise model (ANM) while simultaneously ensuring privacy of the users. Our framework provides differential privacy guarantees for a variety of ANM variants. We run extensive experiments, and demonstrate that our techniques are practical and easy to implement. Matt J. Kusner, Yu Sun 0020, Karthik Sridharan, Kilian Q. Weinberger |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2016 | Deep Networks with Stochastic Depth
Gao Huang 0001, Yu Sun 0020, Zhuang Liu 0003, Daniel Sedra, Kilian Q. Weinberger |
ECCV (4) | 2 |
| 2016 | Supervised Word Mover's DistanceabstractAccurately measuring the similarity between text documents lies at the core of many real world applications of machine learning. These include web-search ranking, document recommendation, multi-lingual document matching, and article categorization. Recently, a new document metric, the word mover's distance (WMD), has been proposed with unprecedented results on kNN-based document classification. The WMD elevates high quality word embeddings to document metrics by formulating the distance between two documents as an optimal transport problem between the embedded words. However, the document distances are entirely unsupervised and lack a mechanism to incorporate supervision when available. In this paper we propose an efficient technique to learn a supervised metric, which we call the Supervised WMD (S-WMD) metric. Our algorithm learns document distances that measure the underlying semantic differences between documents by leveraging semantic differences between individual words discovered during supervised training. This is achieved with an linear transformation of the underlying word embedding space and tailored word-specific weights, learned to minimize the stochastic leave-one-out nearest neighbor classification error on a per-document level. We evaluate our metric on eight real-world text classification tasks on which S-WMD consistently outperforms almost all of our 26 competitive baselines. Gao Huang 0001, Chuan Guo 0001, Matt J. Kusner, Yu Sun 0020, Fei Sha, Kilian Q. Weinberger |
NIPS | 4 |
| 2015 | From Word Embeddings To Document DistancesabstractWe present the Word Mover’s Distance (WMD), a novel distance function between text documents. Our work is based on recent results in word embeddings that learn semantically meaningful representations for words from local co-occurrences in sentences. The WMD distance measures the dissimilarity between two text documents as the minimum amount of distance that the embedded words of one document need to "travel" to reach the embedded words of another document. We show that this distance metric can be cast as an instance of the Earth Mover’s Distance, a well studied transportation problem for which several highly efficient solvers have been developed. Our metric has no hyperparameters and is straight-forward to implement. Further, we demonstrate on eight real world document classification data sets, in comparison with seven state-of-the-art baselines, that the WMD metric leads to unprecedented low k-nearest neighbor document classification error rates. Matt J. Kusner, Yu Sun 0020, Nicholas I. Kolkin, Kilian Q. Weinberger |
ICML | 2 |