Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Susan Warwick-Armstrong

dblp:62/3779 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1992
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 54% Information extraction and text analysis · 31% Language models and text generation · 16%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › description logic › taxonomic reasoning
inheritance
0.011991
Multipe Default Inheritance in a Unification-Based Lexicon · ACL 1991
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › nonmonotonic reasoning › defeasible reasoning
inheritance with exceptions
0.011991
Multipe Default Inheritance in a Unification-Based Lexicon · ACL 1991
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › constraint-based grammar
unification-based grammar
0.011991
Multipe Default Inheritance in a Unification-Based Lexicon · ACL 1991
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing
0.011990
Asymmetry in Parsing and Generating with Unification Grammars: Case Studies from ELU · ACL 1990
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
unification-based parsing
0.011990
Asymmetry in Parsing and Generating with Unification Grammars: Case Studies from ELU · ACL 1990

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

unification-based grammar · 0.0multiple inheritance · 0.0unification grammar · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1992 A Practical Approach to Multiple Default Inheritance for Unification-Based Lexicons
Graham Russell, Afzal Ballim, John Carroll 0001, Susan Warwick-Armstrong
Comput. Linguistics4
1991 Multipe Default Inheritance in a Unification-Based Lexicon
abstract
A formalism is presented for lexical specification in unification-based grammars which exploits defeasible multiple inheritance to express regularity, sub-regularity, and exceptions in classifying the properties of words. Such systems are in the general case intractable; the present proposal represents an attempt to reduce complexity while retaining sufficient expressive power for the task at hand. Illustrative examples are given of morphological analyses from English and German.
Graham Russell, John Carroll 0001, Susan Warwick-Armstrong
ACL3
1991 A Language for the Statement of Binary Relations over Feature Structures
Graham Russell, Afzal Ballim, Dominique Estival, Susan Warwick-Armstrong
EACL4
1990 Asymmetry in Parsing and Generating with Unification Grammars: Case Studies from ELU
abstract
Recent developments in generation algorithms have enabled work in unification-based computational linguistics to approach more closely the ideal of grammars as declarative statements of linguistic facts, neutral between analysis and synthesis. From this perspective, however, the situation is still far from perfect; all known methods of generation impose constraints on the grammars they assume.We briefly consider a number of proposals for generation, outlining their consequences for the form of grammars, and then report on experience arising from the addition of a generator to an existing unification environment. The algorithm in question (based on that of Shieber et al. (1989)), though among the most permissive currently available, excludes certain classes of parsable analyses.
Graham Russell, Susan Warwick-Armstrong, John Carroll 0001
ACL2
1984 Design Of A Machine Translation System For A Sublanguage
abstract
This paper describes the design of a prototype machine translation system for a sublanguage of job advertisements. The design is based on the hypothesis that specialized linguistic subsystems may require special computational treatment and that therefore a relatively shallow analysis of the text may be sufficient for automatic translation of the sublanguage. This hypothesis and the desire to minimize computation in the transfer phase has led to the adoption of a flat tree representation of the linguistic data.
Beat Buchmann, Susan Warwick-Armstrong, Patrick Shane
COLING2