Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Burr Settles
dblp:62/3903
· DBLP profile ↗
16ranked-venue papers
8as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 14 · 6 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
9 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 25% Reinforcement learning · 20% Information extraction and text analysis · 19% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers |
Learning and educational technologies · 60% Collaborative and social computing · 40% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 57% Computing education · 26% Computational social science and digital humanities · 17% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
3 papers |
Empirical software engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
bandit |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Sleeping, Recovering Bandit Algorithm for Optimizing Recurring Notifications · KDD 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
web information extraction |
0.3 | 2 | 2015 | Never-Ending Learning · AAAI 2015 Toward an Architecture for Never-Ending Language Learning · AAAI 2010 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
0.3 | 3 | 2011 | Closing the Loop: Fast, Interactive Semi-Supervised Annotation With Queries on Features and Instances · EMNLP 2011 Active Learning by Labeling Features · EMNLP 2009 Multiple-Instance Active Learning · NIPS 2007 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition
never-ending learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Never-Ending Learning · AAAI 2015 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › ontology › ontology evolution
ontology extension |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Never-Ending Learning · AAAI 2015 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative model |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Learning from Human-Generated Lists · ICML (3) 2013 |
Collaborative and social computing
online communities |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Let's get together: the formation and success of online creative collaborations · CHI 2013 |
Collaborative and social computing › creative collaboration
online creative collaboration |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Let's get together: the formation and success of online creative collaborations · CHI 2013 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition
knowledge base construction |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Toward an Architecture for Never-Ending Language Learning · AAAI 2010 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sequence labeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | An Analysis of Active Learning Strategies for Sequence Labeling Tasks · EMNLP 2008 |
Computing education
language learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | A Trainable Spaced Repetition Model for Language Learning · ACL (1) 2016 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multiple instance learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Multiple-Instance Active Learning · NIPS 2007 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
biomedical text mining |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | ABNER: an open source tool for automatically tagging genes, proteins and other entity names in text · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biomedical text mining › named entity recognition
gene and protein name recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | ABNER: an open source tool for automatically tagging genes, proteins and other entity names in text · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biomedical text mining
named entity recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | ABNER: an open source tool for automatically tagging genes, proteins and other entity names in text · Bioinform. 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
machine learning · 0.6multi-task generalized linear model · 0.5half-life regression · 0.5BERT features · 0.5recovering difference softmax · 0.4active learning · 0.4survey · 0.3path-based regression · 0.3maximum likelihood estimation · 0.3generative modeling · 0.3semi-supervised learning · 0.2feature labeling · 0.1query selection strategies · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Jump-Starting Item Parameters for Adaptive Language TestsabstractA challenge in designing high-stakes language assessments is calibrating the test item difficulties, either a priori or from limited pilot test data.While prior work has addressed 'cold start' estimation of item difficulties without piloting, we devise a multi-task generalized linear model with BERT features to jump-start these estimates, rapidly improving their quality with as few as 500 test-takers and a small sample of item exposures (≈6 each) from a large item bank (≈4,000 items).Our joint model provides a principled way to compare test-taker proficiency, item difficulty, and language proficiency frameworks like the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR).This also enables new item difficulty estimates without piloting them first, which in turn limits item exposure and thus enhances test security.Finally, using operational data from the Duolingo English Test, a high-stakes English proficiency test, we find that difficulty estimates derived using this method correlate strongly with lexico-grammatical features that correlate with reading complexity. Arya McCarthy, Kevin P. Yancey, Geoffrey T. LaFlair, Jesse Egbert, Manqian Liao, Burr Settles |
EMNLP (1) | 6 |
| 2020 | A Sleeping, Recovering Bandit Algorithm for Optimizing Recurring NotificationsabstractMany online and mobile applications rely on daily emails and push notifications to increase and maintain user engagement. The multi-armed bandit approach provides a useful framework for optimizing the content of these notifications, but a number of complications (such as novelty effects and conditional eligibility) make conventional bandit algorithms unsuitable in practice. In this paper, we introduce the Recovering Difference Softmax Algorithm to address the particular challenges of this problem domain, and use it to successfully optimize millions of daily reminders for the online language-learning app Duolingo. This lead to a 0.5%. increase in total daily active users (DAUs) and a 2%, increase in new user retention over a strong baseline. We provide technical details of its design and deployment, and demonstrate its efficacy through both offline and online evaluation experiments. Kevin P. Yancey, Burr Settles |
KDD | 2 |
| 2020 | Workshop Proposal: Educational A/B Testing at ScaleabstractNo abstract available. Steven Ritter 0001, Neil T. Heffernan, Joseph Jay Williams, Burr Settles, Phillip Grimaldi, Derek Lomas |
L@S | 4 |
| 2020 | Machine Learning Driven Language AssessmentabstractWe describe a method for rapidly creating language proficiency assessments, and provide experimental evidence that such tests can be valid, reliable, and secure. Our approach is the first to use machine learning and natural language processing to induce proficiency scales based on a given standard, and then use linguistic models to estimate item difficulty directly for computer-adaptive testing. This alleviates the need for expensive pilot testing with human subjects. We used these methods to develop an online proficiency exam called the Duolingo English Test, and demonstrate that its scores align significantly with other high-stakes English assessments. Furthermore, our approach produces test scores that are highly reliable, while generating item banks large enough to satisfy security requirements. Burr Settles, Masato Hagiwara, Geoffrey T. LaFlair |
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics | 1 |
| 2016 | A Trainable Spaced Repetition Model for Language LearningabstractWe present half-life regression (HLR), a novel model for spaced repetition practice with applications to second language acquisition.HLR combines psycholinguistic theory with modern machine learning techniques, indirectly estimating the "halflife" of a word or concept in a student's long-term memory.We use data from Duolingo -a popular online language learning application -to fit HLR models, reducing error by 45%+ compared to several baselines at predicting student recall rates.HLR model weights also shed light on which linguistic concepts are systematically challenging for second language learners.Finally, HLR was able to improve Duolingo daily student engagement by 12% in an operational user study. Burr Settles, Brendan Meeder |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2015 | Never-Ending LearningabstractWhereas people learn many different types of knowledge from diverse experiences over many years, most current machine learning systems acquire just a single function or data model from just a single data set. We propose a never-ending learning paradigm for machine learning, to better reflect the more ambitious and encompassing type of learning performed by humans. As a case study, we describe the Never-Ending Language Learner (NELL), which achieves some of the desired properties of a never-ending learner, and we discuss lessons learned. NELL has been learning to read the web 24 hours/day since January 2010, and so far has acquired a knowledge base with over 80 million confidence-weighted beliefs (e.g., servedWith(tea, biscuits)). NELL has also learned millions of features and parameters that enable it to read these beliefs from the web. Additionally, it has learned to reason over these beliefs to infer new beliefs, and is able to extend its ontology by synthesizing new relational predicates. NELL can be tracked online at http://rtw.ml.cmu.edu, and followed on Twitter at @CMUNELL. Tom M. Mitchell, William W. Cohen, Estevam Hruschka, Partha P. Talukdar, Justin Betteridge, Andrew Carlson, Bhavana Dalvi, Matt Gardner 0001, Bryan Kisiel, Jayant Krishnamurthy, Ni Lao, Kathryn Mazaitis, Thahir Mohamed, Ndapandula Nakashole, Emmanouil A. Platanios, Alan Ritter, Mehdi Samadi, Burr Settles, Richard C. Wang, Derry Wijaya, Abhinav Gupta 0001, Xinlei Chen, Abulhair Saparov, Malcolm Greaves, Joel Welling |
AAAI | 18 |
| 2013 | Let's get together: the formation and success of online creative collaborationsabstractIn online creative communities, members work together to produce music, movies, games, and other cultural products. Despite the proliferation of collaboration in these communities, we know little about how these teams form and what leads to their ultimate success. Building on theories of social identity and exchange, we present an exploratory study of an online songwriting community. We analyze four years of longitudinal behavioral data using a novel path-based regression model that accurately predicts and reveals key variables about collab formation. Combined with a large-scale survey of members, we find that communication, nuanced complementary interest and status, and a balanced effort from both parties contribute to successful collaborations. We also discuss several applications of these findings for socio-technical infrastructures that support online creative production. Burr Settles, Steven Dow |
CHI | 1 |
| 2013 | Learning from Human-Generated ListsabstractHuman-generated lists are a form of non-iid data with important applications in machine learning and cognitive psychology. We propose a generative model - sampling with reduced replacement (SWIRL) - for such lists. We discuss SWIRL’s relation to standard sampling paradigms, provide the maximum likelihood estimate for learning, and demonstrate its value with two real-world applications: (i) In a ""feature volunteering"" task where non-experts spontaneously generate feature=>label pairs for text classification, SWIRL improves the accuracy of state-of-the-art feature-learning frameworks. (ii) In a ""verbal fluency"" task where brain-damaged patients generate word lists when prompted with a category, SWIRL parameters align well with existing psychological theories, and our model can classify healthy people vs. patients from the lists they generate. Kwang-Sung Jun, Xiaojin Zhu 0001, Burr Settles, Timothy T. Rogers |
ICML (3) | 3 |
| 2012 | Behavioral Factors in Interactive Training of Text Classifiers
Burr Settles, Xiaojin Zhu 0001 |
HLT-NAACL | 1 |
| 2011 | Closing the Loop: Fast, Interactive Semi-Supervised Annotation With Queries on Features and Instances
Burr Settles |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2010 | Toward an Architecture for Never-Ending Language LearningabstractWe consider here the problem of building a never-ending language learner; that is, an intelligent computer agent that runs forever and that each day must (1) extract, or read, information from the web to populate a growing structured knowledge base, and (2) learn to perform this task better than on the previous day. In particular, we propose an approach and a set of design principles for such an agent, describe a partial implementation of such a system that has already learned to extract a knowledge base containing over 242,000 beliefs with an estimated precision of 74% after running for 67 days, and discuss lessons learned from this preliminary attempt to build a never-ending learning agent. Andrew Carlson, Justin Betteridge, Bryan Kisiel, Burr Settles, Estevam Hruschka, Tom M. Mitchell |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2010 | Learning to Tag from Open Vocabulary Labels
Edith Law, Burr Settles, Tom M. Mitchell |
ECML/PKDD (2) | 2 |
| 2009 | Active Learning by Labeling Features
Gregory Druck, Burr Settles, Andrew McCallum |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2008 | An Analysis of Active Learning Strategies for Sequence Labeling Tasks
Burr Settles, Mark Craven |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2007 | Multiple-Instance Active LearningabstractIn a multiple instance (MI) learning problem, instances are naturally organized into bags and it is the bags, instead of individual instances, that are labeled for training. MI learners assume that every instance in a bag labeled negative is actually negative, whereas at least one instance in a bag labeled positive is actually positive. We present a framework for active learning in the multiple-instance setting. In particular, we consider the case in which an MI learner is allowed to selectively query unlabeled instances in positive bags. This approach is well motivated in domains in which it is inexpensive to acquire bag labels and possible, but expensive, to acquire instance labels. We describe a method for learning from labels at mixed levels of granularity, and introduce two active query selection strategies motivated by the MI setting. Our experiments show that learning from instance labels can significantly improve performance of a basic MI learning algorithm in two multiple-instance domains: content-based image recognition and text classification. Burr Settles, Mark Craven, Soumya Ray |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2005 | ABNER: an open source tool for automatically tagging genes, proteins and other entity names in text
Burr Settles |
Bioinform. | 1 |