Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Giancarlo Barresi

dblp:62/3949 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 50% Requirements engineering and software design · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering
software metrics
0.112005
Automated support for process-aware definition and execution of measurement plans · ICSE 2005
Requirements engineering and software design
software process
0.112005
Automated support for process-aware definition and execution of measurement plans · ICSE 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

GQM · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 Automated support for process-aware definition and execution of measurement plans
abstract
Some of the problems with process measurement are generally due to the fact that the definition of measurement plans does not rely on a reference model of the development process that can drive and explain the measuring activities. One of the most popular methodologies addressing the definition of process measurement plans is the GQM (Goal/Question/Metrics). This paper discusses how to support the creation of GQM plans by means of an explicit model of the process being measured. Such a model guides the GQM process, and makes it possible to define precisely –if not formally– the metrics involved. A tool supporting the proposed method is also illustrated.
Luigi Lavazza, Giancarlo Barresi
ICSE2