Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Patrick White

dblp:62/6749 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 3Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Computational complexity · 63% Information theory · 31% Automated reasoning and model checking · 2%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity › property testing
distribution testing
0.232013
Testing Closeness of Discrete Distributions · J. ACM 2013
Testing Random Variables for Independence and Identity · FOCS 2001
Testing that distributions are close · FOCS 2000
Computational complexity
property testing
0.232013
Testing Closeness of Discrete Distributions · J. ACM 2013
Testing Random Variables for Independence and Identity · FOCS 2001
Testing that distributions are close · FOCS 2000
Computational complexity › property testing › distribution testing
closeness testing
0.222013
Testing Closeness of Discrete Distributions · J. ACM 2013
Testing that distributions are close · FOCS 2000
Information theory › information measures › divergence measures
l1 distance
0.212013
Testing Closeness of Discrete Distributions · J. ACM 2013
Information theory › information measures › divergence measures
statistical distance
0.212013
Testing Closeness of Discrete Distributions · J. ACM 2013
Computational complexity
probabilistically checkable proofs
0.112005
Fast approximate PCPs for multidimensional bin-packing problems · Inf. Comput. 2005
Computational complexity › algebraic complexity
identity testing
0.012001
Testing Random Variables for Independence and Identity · FOCS 2001
Information theory › hypothesis testing
independence testing
0.012001
Testing Random Variables for Independence and Identity · FOCS 2001
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking › probabilistic model checking
markov chain model checking
0.012000
Testing that distributions are close · FOCS 2000
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms › sampling › markov chain monte carlo
rapid mixing
0.012000
Testing that distributions are close · FOCS 2000
Approximation and online algorithms
bin packing
0.012005
Fast approximate PCPs for multidimensional bin-packing problems · Inf. Comput. 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sublinear sampling · 0.2markov chain mixing analysis · 0.2sample complexity lower bounds · 0.1l1 distance · 0.1sublinear algorithms · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Testing Closeness of Discrete Distributions
abstract
Given samples from two distributions over an n -element set, we wish to test whether these distributions are statistically close. We present an algorithm which uses sublinear in n , specifically, O ( n 2/3 ε −8/3 log n ), independent samples from each distribution, runs in time linear in the sample size, makes no assumptions about the structure of the distributions, and distinguishes the cases when the distance between the distributions is small (less than { ε 4/3 n −1/3 /32, εn −1/2 /4}) or large (more than ε ) in ℓ 1 distance. This result can be compared to the lower bound of Ω ( n 2/3 ε −2/3 ) for this problem given by Valiant [2008]. Our algorithm has applications to the problem of testing whether a given Markov process is rapidly mixing. We present sublinear algorithms for several variants of this problem as well.
Tugkan Batu, Lance Fortnow, Ronitt Rubinfeld, Warren D. Smith, Patrick White
J. ACM5
2005 Fast approximate PCPs for multidimensional bin-packing problems
Tugkan Batu, Ronitt Rubinfeld, Patrick White
Inf. Comput.3
2001 Testing Random Variables for Independence and Identity
abstract
Given access to independent samples of a distribution A over [n] /spl times/ [m], we show how to test whether the distributions formed by projecting A to each coordinate are independent, i.e., whether A is /spl epsi/-close in the L/sub 1/ norm to the product distribution A/sub 1//spl times/A/sub 2/ for some distributions A/sub 1/ over [n] and A/sub 2/ over [m]. The sample complexity of our test is O/spl tilde/(n/sup 2/3/m/sup 1/3/poly(/spl epsi//sup -1/)), assuming without loss of generality that m/spl les/n. We also give a matching lower bound, up to poly (log n, /spl epsi//sup -1/) factors. Furthermore, given access to samples of a distribution X over [n], we show how to test if X is /spl epsi/-close in L/sub 1/ norm to an explicitly specified distribution Y. Our test uses O/spl tilde/(n/sup 1/2/poly(/spl epsi//sup -1/)) samples, which nearly matches the known tight bounds for the case when Y is uniform.
Tugkan Batu, Lance Fortnow, Eldar Fischer, Ravi Kumar 0001, Ronitt Rubinfeld, Patrick White
FOCS6
2000 Testing that distributions are close
abstract
Given two distributions over an n element set, we wish to check whether these distributions are statistically close by only sampling. We give a sublinear algorithm which uses O(n/sup 2/3//spl epsiv//sup -4/ log n) independent samples from each distribution, runs in time linear in the sample size, makes no assumptions about the structure of the distributions, and distinguishes the cases when the distance between the distributions is small (less than max(/spl epsiv//sup 2//32/sup 3//spl radic/n,/spl epsiv//4/spl radic/n=)) or large (more than /spl epsiv/) in L/sub 1/-distance. We also give an /spl Omega/(n/sup 2/3//spl epsiv//sup -2/3/) lower bound. Our algorithm has applications to the problem of checking whether a given Markov process is rapidly mixing. We develop sublinear algorithms for this problem as well.
Tugkan Batu, Lance Fortnow, Ronitt Rubinfeld, Warren D. Smith, Patrick White
FOCS5