Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Richard W. Weyhrauch

dblp:62/6941 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-authorTheory of computation · 4 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Logic in computer science · 75% Automated reasoning and model checking · 25%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
automated reasoning
0.011980
Prolegomena to a Theory of Mechanized Formal Reasoning · Artif. Intell. 1980
Automated reasoning and model checking › theorem proving
proof checking
0.011975
Checking Proofs in the Metamathematics of First Order Logic · IJCAI 1975
Logic in computer science
proof theory
0.011975
Checking Proofs in the Metamathematics of First Order Logic · IJCAI 1975

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

formal logic · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 A Many-Sorted Natural Deduction
abstract
The goal of this paper is to motivate and define yet another sorted logic, called SND. All the previous sorted logics that can be found in the Artificial Intelligence literature have been designed to be used in (completely) automated deduction. SND has been designed to be used in interactive theorem proving. Because of this shift of focus, SND has been designed to satisfy three innovative design requirements: it is defined on top of a natural deduction calculus, and in a way to be a definitional extension of such calculus; and it is implemented on top of its implementation. In turn, because of this fact, SND has various innovative technical properties; among them: it allows us to deal with free variables, it has no notion of well‐sortedness and of well‐sortedness being a prerequisite of well‐formedness, its implementation is such that, in the default mode, the system behaves exactly as with the original unsorted calculus.
Alessandro Cimatti, Fausto Giunchiglia, Richard W. Weyhrauch
Comput. Intell.3
1990 Towards a Theory of Mechanizable Theories: I, FOL Contexts: The Extensional View
Carolyn L. Talcott, Richard W. Weyhrauch
ECAI2
1984 A Decidable Fragment of Predicate Calculus
Jussi Ketonen, Richard W. Weyhrauch
Theor. Comput. Sci.2
1982 An Example of FOL Using Metatheory
Richard W. Weyhrauch
CADE1
1980 Using Meta-Theoretic Reasoning to do Algebra
Luigia Carlucci Aiello, Richard W. Weyhrauch
CADE2
1980 Prolegomena to a Theory of Mechanized Formal Reasoning
Richard W. Weyhrauch
Artif. Intell.1
1977 Pascal in LCF: Semantics and Examples of Proof
Luigia Carlucci Aiello, Mario Aiello, Richard W. Weyhrauch
Theor. Comput. Sci.3
1975 Checking Proofs in the Metamathematics of First Order Logic
Mario Aiello, Richard W. Weyhrauch
IJCAI2