Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Richard W. Weyhrauch
dblp:62/6941
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-authorTheory of computation · 4 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Logic in computer science · 75% Automated reasoning and model checking · 25% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
automated reasoning |
0.0 | 1 | 1980 | Prolegomena to a Theory of Mechanized Formal Reasoning · Artif. Intell. 1980 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › theorem proving
proof checking |
0.0 | 1 | 1975 | Checking Proofs in the Metamathematics of First Order Logic · IJCAI 1975 |
Logic in computer science
proof theory |
0.0 | 1 | 1975 | Checking Proofs in the Metamathematics of First Order Logic · IJCAI 1975 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
formal logic · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | A Many-Sorted Natural DeductionabstractThe goal of this paper is to motivate and define yet another sorted logic, called SND. All the previous sorted logics that can be found in the Artificial Intelligence literature have been designed to be used in (completely) automated deduction. SND has been designed to be used in interactive theorem proving. Because of this shift of focus, SND has been designed to satisfy three innovative design requirements: it is defined on top of a natural deduction calculus, and in a way to be a definitional extension of such calculus; and it is implemented on top of its implementation. In turn, because of this fact, SND has various innovative technical properties; among them: it allows us to deal with free variables, it has no notion of well‐sortedness and of well‐sortedness being a prerequisite of well‐formedness, its implementation is such that, in the default mode, the system behaves exactly as with the original unsorted calculus. Alessandro Cimatti, Fausto Giunchiglia, Richard W. Weyhrauch |
Comput. Intell. | 3 |
| 1990 | Towards a Theory of Mechanizable Theories: I, FOL Contexts: The Extensional View
Carolyn L. Talcott, Richard W. Weyhrauch |
ECAI | 2 |
| 1984 | A Decidable Fragment of Predicate Calculus
Jussi Ketonen, Richard W. Weyhrauch |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 2 |
| 1982 | An Example of FOL Using Metatheory
Richard W. Weyhrauch |
CADE | 1 |
| 1980 | Using Meta-Theoretic Reasoning to do Algebra
Luigia Carlucci Aiello, Richard W. Weyhrauch |
CADE | 2 |
| 1980 | Prolegomena to a Theory of Mechanized Formal Reasoning
Richard W. Weyhrauch |
Artif. Intell. | 1 |
| 1977 | Pascal in LCF: Semantics and Examples of Proof
Luigia Carlucci Aiello, Mario Aiello, Richard W. Weyhrauch |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 3 |
| 1975 | Checking Proofs in the Metamathematics of First Order Logic
Mario Aiello, Richard W. Weyhrauch |
IJCAI | 2 |