Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Johan Sandberg

dblp:62/7051 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
0000-0002-4481-3367ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 6 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Audio and music processing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Audio and music processing › speaker recognition
speaker verification
0.112012
Low-Variance Multitaper MFCC Features: A Case Study in Robust Speaker Verification · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2012
Audio and music processing › audio feature extraction
mel-frequency cepstral coefficients
0.012012
Low-Variance Multitaper MFCC Features: A Case Study in Robust Speaker Verification · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2012
Audio and music processing › audio feature extraction
speech feature extraction
0.012012
Low-Variance Multitaper MFCC Features: A Case Study in Robust Speaker Verification · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

support vector machine · 0.1multitaper spectral estimation · 0.1joint factor analysis · 0.1gaussian mixture model · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Comparing spectrum estimators in speaker verification under additive noise degradation
abstract
Different short-term spectrum estimators for speaker verification under additive noise are considered. Conventionally, mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs) are computed from discrete Fourier transform (DFT) spectra of windowed speech frames. Recently, linear prediction (LP) and its temporally weighted variants have been substituted as the spectrum analysis method in speech and speaker recognition. In this paper, 12 different short-term spectrum estimation methods are compared for speaker verification under additive noise contamination. Experimental results conducted on NIST 2002 SRE show that the spectrum estimation method has a large effect on recognition performance and stabilized weighted LP (SWLP) and minimum variance distortionless response (MVDR) methods yield approximately 7 % and 8 % relative improvements over the standard DFT method at −10 dB SNR level of factory and babble noises, respectively in terms of equal error rate (EER).
Cemal Hanilçi, Tomi Kinnunen, Rahim Saeidi, Jouni Pohjalainen, Paavo Alku, Figen Ertas, Johan Sandberg, Maria Sandsten
ICASSP7
2012 Optimal cepstrum smoothing
Johan Sandberg, Maria Sandsten
Signal Process.1
2012 Low-Variance Multitaper MFCC Features: A Case Study in Robust Speaker Verification
abstract
In speech and audio applications, short-term signal spectrum is often represented using mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs) computed from a windowed discrete Fourier transform (DFT). Windowing reduces spectral leakage but variance of the spectrum estimate remains high. An elegant extension to windowed DFT is the so-called multitaper method which uses multiple time-domain windows (tapers) with frequency-domain averaging. Multitapers have received little attention in speech processing even though they produce low-variance features. In this paper, we propose the multitaper method for MFCC extraction with a practical focus. We provide, first, detailed statistical analysis of MFCC bias and variance using autoregressive process simulations on the TIMIT corpus. For speaker verification experiments on the NIST 2002 and 2008 SRE corpora, we consider three Gaussian mixture model based classifiers with universal background model (GMM-UBM), support vector machine (GMM-SVM) and joint factor analysis (GMM-JFA). Multitapers improve MinDCF over the baseline windowed DFT by relative 20.4% (GMM-SVM) and 13.7% (GMM-JFA) on the interview-interview condition in NIST 2008. The GMM-JFA system further reduces MinDCF by 18.7% on the telephone data. With these improvements and generally noncritical parameter selection, multitaper MFCCs are a viable candidate for replacing the conventional MFCCs.
Tomi Kinnunen, Rahim Saeidi, Filip Sedlak, Kong-Aik Lee, Johan Sandberg, Maria Sandsten, Haizhou Li 0001
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.5
2010 What else is new than the hamming window? robust MFCCs for speaker recognition via multitapering
abstract
Usually the mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs) are derived via Hamming windowed DFT spectrum. In this paper, we advocate to use a so-called multitaper method instead. Mul-titaper methods form a spectrum estimate using multiple win-dow functions and frequency-domain averaging. Multitapers provide a robust spectrum estimate but have not received much attention in speech processing. Our speaker recognition exper-iment on NIST 2002 yields equal error rates (EERs) of 9.66 % (clean data) and 16.41 % (-10 dB SNR) for the conventional Hamming method and 8.13 % (clean data) and 14.63 % (-10 dB SNR) using multitapers. Multitapering is a simple and robust alternative to the Hamming window method. Index Terms: speaker verification, multiple window method 1.
Tomi Kinnunen, Rahim Saeidi, Johan Sandberg, Maria Sandsten
INTERSPEECH3
2010 Optimal stochastic discrete time-frequency analysis in the ambiguity and time-lag domain
Johan Sandberg, Maria Sandsten
Signal Process.1
2010 Multitaper Estimation of Frequency-Warped Cepstra With Application to Speaker Verification
abstract
Usually the mel-frequency cepstral coefficients are estimated either from a periodogram or from a windowed periodogram. We state a general estimator which also includes multitaper estimators. We propose approximations of the variance and bias of the estimate of each coefficient. By using Monte Carlo computations, we demonstrate that the approximations are accurate. Using the proposed formulas, the peak matched multitaper estimator is shown to have low mean square error (squared bias + variance) on speech-like processes. It is also shown to perform slightly better in the NIST 2006 speaker verification task as compared to the Hamming window conventionally used in this context.
Johan Sandberg, Maria Sandsten, Tomi Kinnunen, Rahim Saeidi, Patrick Flandrin, Pierre Borgnat
IEEE Signal Process. Lett.1
2009 Optimal cepstrum estimation using multiple windows
abstract
The aim of this paper is to find a multiple window estimator that is mean square error optimal for cepstrum estimation. The estimator is compared with some known multiple window methods as well as with the parametric AR-estimator. The results show that the new estimator has high performance, especially for data with large spectral dynamics, and that it is also robust against parameter choices. Simulated speech data is used for the evaluation. It is also shown that the windows of the estimator can be approximated with the sinusoidal multiple windows and that the weighting factors of the different periodograms can be analytically computed.
Maria Sandsten, Johan Sandberg
ICASSP2