Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Seth A. Myers
dblp:62/8656
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 3 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
5 papers |
Web and social media mining · 88% Data mining · 12% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 54% Smart cities and intelligent transportation · 46% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 57% Generative modeling · 43% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Web and social media mining
information diffusion |
0.2 | 2 | 2014 | Clash of the Contagions: Cooperation and Competition in Information Diffusion · ICDM 2012 The bursty dynamics of the Twitter information network · WWW 2014 |
Web and social media mining › social network analysis
social network evolution |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | The bursty dynamics of the Twitter information network · WWW 2014 |
Web and social media mining
social network analysis |
0.2 | 2 | 2012 | Friendship and mobility: user movement in location-based social networks · KDD 2011 Information diffusion and external influence in networks · KDD 2012 |
Computational social science and digital humanities › social network analysis
information diffusion |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Information diffusion and external influence in networks · KDD 2012 |
Web and social media mining › information diffusion
information diffusion prediction |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Clash of the Contagions: Cooperation and Competition in Information Diffusion · ICDM 2012 |
Smart cities and intelligent transportation › urban informatics
human mobility modeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Friendship and mobility: user movement in location-based social networks · KDD 2011 |
Web and social media mining
location-based social network |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Friendship and mobility: user movement in location-based social networks · KDD 2011 |
Data mining
network inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | On the Convexity of Latent Social Network Inference · NIPS 2010 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | On the Convexity of Latent Social Network Inference · NIPS 2010 |
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation
maximum likelihood estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | On the Convexity of Latent Social Network Inference · NIPS 2010 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | On the Convexity of Latent Social Network Inference · NIPS 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
l1 regularization · 0.3convex programming · 0.3statistical contagion interaction model · 0.3statistical modeling · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | The bursty dynamics of the Twitter information networkabstractIn online social media systems users are not only posting, consuming, and resharing content, but also creating new and destroying existing connections in the underlying social network. While each of these two types of dynamics has individually been studied in the past, much less is known about the connection between the two. How does user information posting and seeking behavior interact with the evolution of the underlying social network structure? Here, we study ways in which network structure reacts to users posting and sharing content. We examine the complete dynamics of the Twitter information network, where users post and reshare information while they also create and destroy connections. We find that the dynamics of network structure can be characterized by steady rates of change, interrupted by sudden bursts. Information diffusion in the form of cascades of post re-sharing often creates such sudden bursts of new connections, which significantly change users' local network structure. We also explore the effect of the information content on the dynamics of the network and find evidence that the appearance of new topics and real-world events can lead to significant changes in edge creations and deletions. Lastly, we develop a model that quantifies the dynamics of the network and the occurrence of these bursts as a function of the information spreading through the network. The model can successfully predict which information diffusion events will lead to bursts in network dynamics. Seth A. Myers, Jure Leskovec |
WWW | 1 |
| 2012 | Clash of the Contagions: Cooperation and Competition in Information DiffusionabstractIn networks, contagions such as information, purchasing behaviors, and diseases, spread and diffuse from node to node over the edges of the network. Moreover, in real-world scenarios multiple contagions spread through the network simultaneously. These contagions not only propagate at the same time but they also interact and compete with each other as they spread over the network. While traditional empirical studies and models of diffusion consider individual contagions as independent and thus spreading in isolation, we study how different contagions interact with each other as they spread through the network. We develop a statistical model that allows for competition as well as cooperation of different contagions in information diffusion. Competing contagions decrease each other's probability of spreading, while cooperating contagions help each other in being adopted throughout the network. We evaluate our model on 18,000 contagions simultaneously spreading through the Twitter network. Our model learns how different contagions interact with each other and then uses these interactions to more accurately predict the diffusion of a contagion through the network. Moreover, the model also provides a compelling hypothesis for the principles that govern content interaction in information diffusion. Most importantly, we find very strong effects of interactions between contagions. Interactions cause a relative change in the spreading probability of a contagion by 71% on the average. Seth A. Myers, Jure Leskovec |
ICDM | 1 |
| 2012 | Information diffusion and external influence in networksabstractSocial networks play a fundamental role in the diffusion of information. However, there are two different ways of how information reaches a person in a network. Information reaches us through connections in our social networks, as well as through the influence external out-of-network sources, like the mainstream media. While most present models of information adoption in networks assume information only passes from a node to node via the edges of the underlying network, the recent availability of massive online social media data allows us to study this process in more detail. Seth A. Myers, Chenguang Zhu 0001, Jure Leskovec |
KDD | 1 |
| 2011 | Friendship and mobility: user movement in location-based social networksabstractEven though human movement and mobility patterns have a high degree of freedom and variation, they also exhibit structural patterns due to geographic and social constraints. Using cell phone location data, as well as data from two online location-based social networks, we aim to understand what basic laws govern human motion and dynamics. We find that humans experience a combination of periodic movement that is geographically limited and seemingly random jumps correlated with their social networks. Short-ranged travel is periodic both spatially and temporally and not effected by the social network structure, while long-distance travel is more influenced by social network ties. We show that social relationships can explain about 10% to 30% of all human movement, while periodic behavior explains 50% to 70%. Based on our findings, we develop a model of human mobility that combines periodic short range movements with travel due to the social network structure. We show that our model reliably predicts the locations and dynamics of future human movement and gives an order of magnitude better performance than present models of human mobility. Eunjoon Cho, Seth A. Myers, Jure Leskovec |
KDD | 2 |
| 2010 | On the Convexity of Latent Social Network InferenceabstractIn many real-world scenarios, it is nearly impossible to collect explicit social network data. In such cases, whole networks must be inferred from underlying observations. Here, we formulate the problem of inferring latent social networks based on network diffusion or disease propagation data. We consider contagions propagating over the edges of an unobserved social network, where we only observe the times when nodes became infected, but not who infected them. Given such node infection times, we then identify the optimal network that best explains the observed data. We present a maximum likelihood approach based on convex programming with a l1-like penalty term that encourages sparsity. Experiments on real and synthetic data reveal that our method near-perfectly recovers the underlying network structure as well as the parameters of the contagion propagation model. Moreover, our approach scales well as it can infer optimal networks on thousands of nodes in a matter of minutes. Seth A. Myers, Jure Leskovec |
NIPS | 1 |