Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Seth A. Myers

dblp:62/8656 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 3 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
5 papers
Web and social media mining · 88% Data mining · 12%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Computational social science and digital humanities · 54% Smart cities and intelligent transportation · 46%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 57% Generative modeling · 43%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Web and social media mining
information diffusion
0.222014
Clash of the Contagions: Cooperation and Competition in Information Diffusion · ICDM 2012
The bursty dynamics of the Twitter information network · WWW 2014
Web and social media mining › social network analysis
social network evolution
0.212014
The bursty dynamics of the Twitter information network · WWW 2014
Web and social media mining
social network analysis
0.222012
Friendship and mobility: user movement in location-based social networks · KDD 2011
Information diffusion and external influence in networks · KDD 2012
Computational social science and digital humanities › social network analysis
information diffusion
0.112012
Information diffusion and external influence in networks · KDD 2012
Web and social media mining › information diffusion
information diffusion prediction
0.112012
Clash of the Contagions: Cooperation and Competition in Information Diffusion · ICDM 2012
Smart cities and intelligent transportation › urban informatics
human mobility modeling
0.112011
Friendship and mobility: user movement in location-based social networks · KDD 2011
Web and social media mining
location-based social network
0.112011
Friendship and mobility: user movement in location-based social networks · KDD 2011
Data mining
network inference
0.112010
On the Convexity of Latent Social Network Inference · NIPS 2010
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.112010
On the Convexity of Latent Social Network Inference · NIPS 2010
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation
maximum likelihood estimation
0.112010
On the Convexity of Latent Social Network Inference · NIPS 2010
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.012010
On the Convexity of Latent Social Network Inference · NIPS 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

l1 regularization · 0.3convex programming · 0.3statistical contagion interaction model · 0.3statistical modeling · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 The bursty dynamics of the Twitter information network
abstract
In online social media systems users are not only posting, consuming, and resharing content, but also creating new and destroying existing connections in the underlying social network. While each of these two types of dynamics has individually been studied in the past, much less is known about the connection between the two. How does user information posting and seeking behavior interact with the evolution of the underlying social network structure? Here, we study ways in which network structure reacts to users posting and sharing content. We examine the complete dynamics of the Twitter information network, where users post and reshare information while they also create and destroy connections. We find that the dynamics of network structure can be characterized by steady rates of change, interrupted by sudden bursts. Information diffusion in the form of cascades of post re-sharing often creates such sudden bursts of new connections, which significantly change users' local network structure. We also explore the effect of the information content on the dynamics of the network and find evidence that the appearance of new topics and real-world events can lead to significant changes in edge creations and deletions. Lastly, we develop a model that quantifies the dynamics of the network and the occurrence of these bursts as a function of the information spreading through the network. The model can successfully predict which information diffusion events will lead to bursts in network dynamics.
Seth A. Myers, Jure Leskovec
WWW1
2012 Clash of the Contagions: Cooperation and Competition in Information Diffusion
abstract
In networks, contagions such as information, purchasing behaviors, and diseases, spread and diffuse from node to node over the edges of the network. Moreover, in real-world scenarios multiple contagions spread through the network simultaneously. These contagions not only propagate at the same time but they also interact and compete with each other as they spread over the network. While traditional empirical studies and models of diffusion consider individual contagions as independent and thus spreading in isolation, we study how different contagions interact with each other as they spread through the network. We develop a statistical model that allows for competition as well as cooperation of different contagions in information diffusion. Competing contagions decrease each other's probability of spreading, while cooperating contagions help each other in being adopted throughout the network. We evaluate our model on 18,000 contagions simultaneously spreading through the Twitter network. Our model learns how different contagions interact with each other and then uses these interactions to more accurately predict the diffusion of a contagion through the network. Moreover, the model also provides a compelling hypothesis for the principles that govern content interaction in information diffusion. Most importantly, we find very strong effects of interactions between contagions. Interactions cause a relative change in the spreading probability of a contagion by 71% on the average.
Seth A. Myers, Jure Leskovec
ICDM1
2012 Information diffusion and external influence in networks
abstract
Social networks play a fundamental role in the diffusion of information. However, there are two different ways of how information reaches a person in a network. Information reaches us through connections in our social networks, as well as through the influence external out-of-network sources, like the mainstream media. While most present models of information adoption in networks assume information only passes from a node to node via the edges of the underlying network, the recent availability of massive online social media data allows us to study this process in more detail.
Seth A. Myers, Chenguang Zhu 0001, Jure Leskovec
KDD1
2011 Friendship and mobility: user movement in location-based social networks
abstract
Even though human movement and mobility patterns have a high degree of freedom and variation, they also exhibit structural patterns due to geographic and social constraints. Using cell phone location data, as well as data from two online location-based social networks, we aim to understand what basic laws govern human motion and dynamics. We find that humans experience a combination of periodic movement that is geographically limited and seemingly random jumps correlated with their social networks. Short-ranged travel is periodic both spatially and temporally and not effected by the social network structure, while long-distance travel is more influenced by social network ties. We show that social relationships can explain about 10% to 30% of all human movement, while periodic behavior explains 50% to 70%. Based on our findings, we develop a model of human mobility that combines periodic short range movements with travel due to the social network structure. We show that our model reliably predicts the locations and dynamics of future human movement and gives an order of magnitude better performance than present models of human mobility.
Eunjoon Cho, Seth A. Myers, Jure Leskovec
KDD2
2010 On the Convexity of Latent Social Network Inference
abstract
In many real-world scenarios, it is nearly impossible to collect explicit social network data. In such cases, whole networks must be inferred from underlying observations. Here, we formulate the problem of inferring latent social networks based on network diffusion or disease propagation data. We consider contagions propagating over the edges of an unobserved social network, where we only observe the times when nodes became infected, but not who infected them. Given such node infection times, we then identify the optimal network that best explains the observed data. We present a maximum likelihood approach based on convex programming with a l1-like penalty term that encourages sparsity. Experiments on real and synthetic data reveal that our method near-perfectly recovers the underlying network structure as well as the parameters of the contagion propagation model. Moreover, our approach scales well as it can infer optimal networks on thousands of nodes in a matter of minutes.
Seth A. Myers, Jure Leskovec
NIPS1