Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Philippe Théveny

dblp:62/9918 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
High-performance computing · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › numerical analysis
interval arithmetic
0.212014
Numerical Reproducibility and Parallel Computations: Issues for Interval Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Computers 2014
High-performance computing
parallel numerical algorithms
0.112014
Numerical Reproducibility and Parallel Computations: Issues for Interval Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Computers 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

interval computation · 0.4floating-point analysis · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Numerical Reproducibility and Parallel Computations: Issues for Interval Algorithms
abstract
What is callednumerical reproducibilityis the problem of getting the same result when the scientific computation is run several times, either on the same machine or on different machines, with different types and numbers of processing units, execution environments, computational loads, etc. This problem is especially stringent for HPC numerical simulations. In what follows, we identify the problems encountered when implementing interval routines in floating-point arithmetic. Some are well-known and common in numerical computations, some are specific to interval computations. We propose here a classification of floating-point issues by distinguishing their severity with respect to correctness and tightness of the computed interval result. In fact, interval computation can accommodate the lack of numerical reproducibility as long as it does not affect the inclusion property, which is the main property of interval arithmetic. Several ways to preserve the inclusion property are presented, on the example of the product of matrices with interval coefficients.
Nathalie Revol, Philippe Théveny
IEEE Trans. Computers2