EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bharath Chandrasekaran
dblp:63/10030
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-3673-9435ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 5 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Stay on path: PCA along graph paths · ICML 2015 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
principal component analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Stay on path: PCA along graph paths · ICML 2015 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › principal component analysis
sparse principal component analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Stay on path: PCA along graph paths · ICML 2015 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph algorithms |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Stay on path: PCA along graph paths · ICML 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spiked covariance model · 0.4non-convex quadratic maximization · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Extended High-frequency Cues to Phoneme Recognition: Insights from ASR
Zhe-chen Guo, Bharath Chandrasekaran |
INTERSPEECH | 2 |
| 2025 | Language and Accent Familiarity Effects on the Use of Acoustic Cues in Talker Identification
Shengyue Xiong, Zhe-chen Guo, Bharath Chandrasekaran |
INTERSPEECH | 3 |
| 2022 | Talker identification as a categorization problem
Casey L. Roark, Gangyi Feng, Bharath Chandrasekaran |
CogSci | 3 |
| 2022 | Auditory and visual category learning in children
Casey L. Roark, Erica Lescht, Amanda Hampton Wray, Bharath Chandrasekaran |
CogSci | 4 |
| 2021 | Individual Variability in Strategies and Learning Outcomes in Auditory Category Learning
Casey L. Roark, Bharath Chandrasekaran |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2020 | Auditory, Visual, and Speech Category Learning in the Same Individuals
Casey L. Roark, Bharath Chandrasekaran |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2019 | Native Language and Stimuli Signal Prediction from EEGabstractUnderstanding the neural processing of natural speech processing is an important first step for designing Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) based speech enhancement and speech recognition systems. Complex neural signals like electroencephalography (EEG) are time-varying and has a non-linear relationship with continuous speech. Linear models can decode stimulus features reliably, but the correlation between the reconstructed signal and continuous EEG remain low despite attempts at optimization. In the current application, we demonstrate the utility of a Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) model to relate various stimuli features such as the envelope, spectrogram to the continuous EEG in a cocktail party scenario. We use a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural network architecture that has self-connecting loops which help in preserving past information to predict future value. Given that predictability plays a critical role in speech comprehension, we posit that such a neural network architecture yield better results. In attended condition, for native participants, the LSTM models yield 30% and 22% mean correlation improvement and for non-native participants, 43% and 37% improvement over linear models for envelope and spectrogram respectively with EEG. Finally, we have trained a single model to predict the native language of a participant using EEG and it yielded 95% accuracy. Madhumitha Sakthi, Ahmed H. Tewfik, Bharath Chandrasekaran |
ICASSP | 3 |
| 2015 | Using Real-Time Computational Modeling to Individually Optimize Speech Category Learning
Seth Koslov, Nathaniel Blanco, Bharath Chandrasekaran, W. Todd Maddox |
CogSci | 3 |
| 2015 | Stay on path: PCA along graph pathsabstractWe introduce a variant of (sparse) PCA in which the set of feasible support sets is determined by a graph. In particular, we consider the following setting: given a directed acyclic graph G on p vertices corresponding to variables, the non-zero entries of the extracted principal component must coincide with vertices lying along a path in G. From a statistical perspective, information on the underlying network may potentially reduce the number of observations required to recover the population principal component. We consider the canonical estimator which optimally exploits the prior knowledge by solving a non-convex quadratic maximization on the empirical covariance. We introduce a simple network and analyze the estimator under the spiked covariance model for sparse PCA. We show that side information potentially improves the statistical complexity. We propose two algorithms to approximate the solution of the constrained quadratic maximization, and recover a component with the desired properties. We empirically evaluate our schemes on synthetic and real datasets. Megasthenis Asteris, Anastasios Kyrillidis, Alexandros G. Dimakis, Han-Gyol Yi, Bharath Chandrasekaran |
ICML | 5 |