Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dan Iter
dblp:63/10689
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
1as first author
7since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 1 first-author · 7 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Language models and text generation · 57% Information extraction and text analysis · 20% Optimization for machine learning · 6% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 77% Distributed systems · 23% |
Topics — the 22 heaviest of 25, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › prompting › prompt engineering › prompt optimization
automatic prompt optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Search · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › prompting
chain-of-thought prompting |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using Gpt-4 with Better Human Alignment · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
context generation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Generate rather than Retrieve: Large Language Models are Strong Context Generators · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient-based optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Search · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using Gpt-4 with Better Human Alignment · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
open-domain question answering |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Generate rather than Retrieve: Large Language Models are Strong Context Generators · ICLR 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › prompting › prompt engineering
prompt optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Search · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation evaluation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using Gpt-4 with Better Human Alignment · EMNLP 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain adaptation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | The Trade-offs of Domain Adaptation for Neural Language Models · ACL (1) 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
large language model adaptation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | The Trade-offs of Domain Adaptation for Neural Language Models · ACL (1) 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
coreference resolution |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Focus on what matters: Applying Discourse Coherence Theory to Cross Document Coreference · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › coreference resolution
cross-document coreference resolution |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Focus on what matters: Applying Discourse Coherence Theory to Cross Document Coreference · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › coreference resolution
event coreference resolution |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Focus on what matters: Applying Discourse Coherence Theory to Cross Document Coreference · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis
discourse coherence |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Pretraining with Contrastive Sentence Objectives Improves Discourse Performance of Language Models · ACL 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding
discourse modeling |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Pretraining with Contrastive Sentence Objectives Improves Discourse Performance of Language Models · ACL 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
pre-training objectives |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Pretraining with Contrastive Sentence Objectives Improves Discourse Performance of Language Models · ACL 2020 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
serverless computing |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | From Laptop to Lambda: Outsourcing Everyday Jobs to Thousands of Transient Functional Containers · USENIX ATC 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › AI safety
jailbreak detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Search · EMNLP 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › transfer learning theory
domain adaptation theory |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | The Trade-offs of Domain Adaptation for Neural Language Models · ACL (1) 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | The Trade-offs of Domain Adaptation for Neural Language Models · ACL (1) 2022 |
Information retrieval › web search › web information retrieval
social media retrieval |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Identifying content for planned events across social media sites · WSDM 2012 |
Web and social media mining
event detection |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Identifying content for planned events across social media sites · WSDM 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
user study · 0.7textual gradient · 0.7task-oriented analysis · 0.7prompting · 0.7large language model · 0.7form-filling paradigm · 0.7chain-of-thought · 0.7beam search · 0.7bandit selection · 0.7importance sampling · 0.6query formulation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | PEARL: Prompting Large Language Models to Plan and Execute Actions Over Long DocumentsabstractSimeng Sun, Yang Liu, Shuohang Wang, Dan Iter, Chenguang Zhu, Mohit Iyyer. Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024. Simeng Sun, Yang Liu 0124, Shuohang Wang, Dan Iter, Chenguang Zhu 0001, Mohit Iyyer |
EACL (1) | 4 |
| 2023 | G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using Gpt-4 with Better Human AlignmentabstractThe quality of texts generated by natural language generation (NLG) systems is hard to measure automatically.Conventional referencebased metrics, such as BLEU and ROUGE, have been shown to have relatively low correlation with human judgments, especially for tasks that require creativity and diversity.Recent studies suggest using large language models (LLMs) as reference-free metrics for NLG evaluation, which have the benefit of being applicable to new tasks that lack human references.However, these LLM-based evaluators still have lower human correspondence than medium-size neural evaluators.In this work, we present G-EVAL, a framework of using large language models with chain-of-thoughts (CoT) and a form-filling paradigm, to assess the quality of NLG outputs.We experiment with two generation tasks, text summarization and dialogue generation.We show that G-EVAL with GPT-4 as the backbone model achieves a Spearman correlation of 0.514 with human on summarization task, outperforming all previous methods by a large margin.We also propose analysis on the behavior of LLM-based evaluators, and highlight the potential concern of LLM-based evaluators having a bias towards the LLM-generated texts. 1 Dan Iter, Yichong Xu, Shuohang Wang, Ruochen Xu |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2023 | The Shifted and The Overlooked: A Task-oriented Investigation of User-GPT InteractionsabstractSiru Ouyang, Shuohang Wang, Yang Liu, Ming Zhong, Yizhu Jiao, Dan Iter, Reid Pryzant, Chenguang Zhu, Heng Ji, Jiawei Han. Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2023. Siru Ouyang, Shuohang Wang, Ming Zhong 0005, Yizhu Jiao, Dan Iter, Reid Pryzant, Chenguang Zhu 0001, Heng Ji 0001, Jiawei Han 0001 |
EMNLP | 6 |
| 2023 | Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam SearchabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance as general purpose agents, but their abilities remain highly dependent on prompts which are hand written with onerous trial-and-error effort.We propose a simple and nonparametric solution to this problem, Prompt Optimization with Textual Gradients (ProTeGi), which is inspired by numerical gradient descent to automatically improve prompts, assuming access to training data and an LLM API.The algorithm uses minibatches of data to form natural language "gradients" that criticize the current prompt, much like how numerical gradients point in the direction of error ascent.The natural language gradients are then "propagated" into the prompt by editing the prompt in the opposite semantic direction of the gradient.These gradient descent steps are guided by a beam search and bandit selection procedure which significantly improves algorithmic efficiency.Preliminary results across three benchmark NLP tasks and the novel problem of LLM jailbreak detection suggest that Automatic Prompt Optimization can outperform prior prompt editing techniques and improve an initial prompt's performance by up to 31%, by using data to rewrite vague task descriptions into more precise annotation instructions.1 Reid Pryzant, Dan Iter, Jerry Li 0001, Yin Tat Lee, Chenguang Zhu 0001, Michael Zeng 0001 |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2023 | Generate rather than Retrieve: Large Language Models are Strong Context Generators
Wenhao Yu 0002, Dan Iter, Shuohang Wang, Yichong Xu, Mingxuan Ju, Soumya Sanyal 0001, Chenguang Zhu 0001, Michael Zeng 0001, Meng Jiang 0001 |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2022 | The Trade-offs of Domain Adaptation for Neural Language ModelsabstractThis work connects language model adaptation with concepts of machine learning theory.We consider a training setup with a large outof-domain set and a small in-domain set.We derive how the benefit of training a model on either set depends on the size of the sets and the distance between their underlying distributions.We analyze how out-of-domain pretraining before in-domain fine-tuning achieves better generalization than either solution independently.Finally, we present how adaptation techniques based on data selection, such as importance sampling, intelligent data selection and influence functions, can be presented in a common framework which highlights their similarity and also their subtle differences. David Grangier, Dan Iter |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2021 | Focus on what matters: Applying Discourse Coherence Theory to Cross Document CoreferenceabstractPerforming event and entity coreference resolution across documents vastly increases the number of candidate mentions, making it intractable to do the full n 2 pairwise comparisons.Existing approaches simplify by considering coreference only within document clusters, but this fails to handle inter-cluster coreference, common in many applications.As a result cross-document coreference algorithms are rarely applied to downstream tasks.We draw on an insight from discourse coherence theory: potential coreferences are constrained by the reader's discourse focus.We model the entities/events in a reader's focus as a neighborhood within a learned latent embedding space which minimizes the distance between mentions and the centroids of their gold coreference clusters.We then use these neighborhoods to sample only hard negatives to train a fine-grained classifier on mention pairs and their local discourse features.Our approach 1 achieves state-of-the-art results for both events and entities on the ECB+, Gun Violence, Football Coreference, and Cross-Domain Cross-Document Coreference corpora.Furthermore, training on multiple corpora improves average performance across all datasets by 17.2 F1 points, leading to a robust coreference resolution model for use in downstream tasks where link distribution is unknown. William Barr Held, Dan Iter, Daniel Jurafsky |
EMNLP (1) | 2 |
| 2020 | Pretraining with Contrastive Sentence Objectives Improves Discourse Performance of Language ModelsabstractRecent models for unsupervised representation learning of text have employed a number of techniques to improve contextual word representations but have put little focus on discourse-level representations.We propose CONPONO 1 , an inter-sentence objective for pretraining language models that models discourse coherence and the distance between sentences.Given an anchor sentence, our model is trained to predict the text k sentences away using a sampled-softmax objective where the candidates consist of neighboring sentences and sentences randomly sampled from the corpus.On the discourse representation benchmark DiscoEval, our model improves over the previous state-of-the-art by up to 13% and on average 4% absolute across 7 tasks.Our model is the same size as BERT-Base, but outperforms the much larger BERT-Large model and other more recent approaches that incorporate discourse.We also show that CONPONO yields gains of 2%-6% absolute even for tasks that do not explicitly evaluate discourse: textual entailment (RTE), common sense reasoning (COPA) and reading comprehension (ReCoRD). Dan Iter, Kelvin Guu, Larry Lansing, Daniel Jurafsky |
ACL | 1 |
| 2019 | From Laptop to Lambda: Outsourcing Everyday Jobs to Thousands of Transient Functional Containers
Sadjad Fouladi, Francisco Romero, Dan Iter, Qian Li 0027, Shuvo Chatterjee, Christoforos E. Kozyrakis, Matei Zaharia, Keith Winstein |
USENIX ATC | 3 |
| 2012 | Identifying content for planned events across social media sitesabstractUser-contributed Web data contains rich and diverse information about a variety of events in the physical world, such as shows, festivals, conferences and more. This information ranges from known event features (e.g., title, time, location) posted on event aggregation platforms (e.g., Last.fm events, EventBrite, Facebook events) to discussions and reactions related to events shared on different social media sites (e.g., Twitter, YouTube, Flickr). In this paper, we focus on the challenge of automatically identifying user-contributed content for events that are planned and, therefore, known in advance, across different social media sites. We mine event aggregation platforms to extract event features, which are often noisy or missing. We use these features to develop query formulation strategies for retrieving content associated with an event on different social media sites. Further, we explore ways in which event content identified on one social media site can be used to retrieve additional relevant event content on other social media sites. We apply our strategies to a large set of user-contributed events, and analyze their effectiveness in retrieving relevant event content from Twitter, YouTube, and Flickr. Hila Becker, Dan Iter, Mor Naaman, Luis Gravano |
WSDM | 2 |
| 2011 | Automatic Identification and Presentation of Twitter Content for Planned Events
Hila Becker, Dan Iter, Mor Naaman, Luis Gravano |
ICWSM | 3 |