Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Watts S. Humphrey
dblp:63/1672
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 6 · 5 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
5 papers |
Requirements engineering and software design · 52% Empirical software engineering · 32% Software maintenance and evolution · 16% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computing education · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements engineering and software design › software process
personal software process |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | The Personal Software Process (PSP): A Full-Day Tutorial · ICSE 1997 |
Software maintenance and evolution › software process improvement
software process maturity |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | A Comparison of U.S. and Japanese Software Process Maturity · ICSE 1991 |
Empirical software engineering
software engineering practice |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | The State of Software Engineering Practice: A Preliminary Report · ICSE 1989 |
Requirements engineering and software design › software process
software process modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Software Process Modeling: Principles of Entity Process Models · ICSE 1989 |
Computing education
software engineering education |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | The Personal Software Process (PSP): A Full-Day Tutorial · ICSE 1997 |
Empirical software engineering
software metrics |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Predicting (Individual) Software Productivity · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1991 |
Requirements engineering and software design
software process |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | A Comparison of U.S. and Japanese Software Process Maturity · ICSE 1991 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
prediction intervals · 0.0integrated moving average · 0.0exponential smoothing · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Preparing students for industry's software engineering needsabstractNo abstract available. Watts S. Humphrey, Robert Musson, Rafael Salazar |
SIGCSE | 1 |
| 2008 | Teaching disciplined software development
H. Dieter Rombach, Jürgen Münch, Alexis Ocampo, Watts S. Humphrey, Dan Burton |
J. Syst. Softw. | 4 |
| 1997 | The Personal Software Process (PSP): A Full-Day TutorialabstractNo abstract available. Watts S. Humphrey, James W. Over |
ICSE | 1 |
| 1991 | A Comparison of U.S. and Japanese Software Process Maturity
Watts S. Humphrey, David H. Kitson, Julia Gale |
ICSE | 1 |
| 1991 | Predicting (Individual) Software ProductivityabstractA method for projecting software productivity with reasonable accuracy which uses the statistical techniques of time series analysis is described. The measure of productivity is the development time required per line of code. In making productivity projections, the key issue is the need to achieve a balance between forecasting stability and responsiveness to changing conditions. An integrated moving average process of order one, using exponential smoothing of all the previous observations, is judged appropriate for software productivity analysis, particularly where there are limited data available or where conditions are sufficiently varied to make much of the available data inapplicable. Empirical evidence suggests that most commonly encountered time series can be reasonably well described by such methods. The methods for computing the weights used for exponential smoothing are described, as are the means for determining prediction intervals, or measures of forecast uncertainty. This data analytic approach uses historical data alone, unlike structural methods where learning curves as well as prior data are used to define the predictive process.> Watts S. Humphrey, Nozer D. Singpurwalla |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 1 |
| 1989 | Software Process Modeling: Principles of Entity Process ModelsabstractA defined software process is needed to provide organizations with a consistent framework for performing their work and im- proving the way they do it. An overall framework for modeling simplifies the task of producing process models, permits them to be tailored to individual needs, and facilitates process evolution. This paper outlines the principles of entity process, models and suggests ways in which they can help to address some of the problems with more conventional approaches to modeling software processes. Watts S. Humphrey, Marc I. Kellner |
ICSE | 1 |
| 1989 | The State of Software Engineering Practice: A Preliminary Report
Watts S. Humphrey, David H. Kitson, Tim C. Kasse |
ICSE | 1 |