Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Kevin J. Duffy

dblp:63/241 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1985
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Database system architecture and tuning · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Systems and software security
database security
0.011985
Design Overview for Retrofitting Integrity-Lock Architecture onto a Commercial DBMS · S&P 1985
Database system architecture and tuning
commercial database systems
0.011985
Design Overview for Retrofitting Integrity-Lock Architecture onto a Commercial DBMS · S&P 1985

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

integrity-lock architecture · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1985 Design Overview for Retrofitting Integrity-Lock Architecture onto a Commercial DBMS
abstract
This paper is a design overview document, intended to aid in the implementation of an integrity-lock database management system. The authors believe that the paper is a realistic overview of the changes that need to be made to a commercial database management system in order that may support the integrity-lock architecture. The paper examine the integrity-lock retrofit at a high level of abstraction. In particular it concentrates on changes that need to be made at the process level and in terms of the functionality that needs to reside in the various functions. It hoped that this high level view will aid in the portability of the integrity-lock architecture to other systems. While the authors' work has involved retrofitting the integrity-lock onto a specific system, we believe that many of the lessons learned in this exercise can be applied to other commercial database management systems.
Richard D. Graubart, Kevin J. Duffy
S&P2