Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Martin Day

dblp:63/2988 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1993
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
out-of-order execution
0.011993
Interrupt Handling for Out-of-Order Execution Processors · IEEE Trans. Computers 1993
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › exception handling
precise interrupts
0.011993
Interrupt Handling for Out-of-Order Execution Processors · IEEE Trans. Computers 1993
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
superscalar processor
0.011993
Interrupt Handling for Out-of-Order Execution Processors · IEEE Trans. Computers 1993

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

instruction window · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1993 Interrupt Handling for Out-of-Order Execution Processors
abstract
Processors with multiple functional units, including the superscalars, achieve significant performance enhancement through low-level execution concurrency. In such processors, multiple instructions are often issued and definitely executed concurrently and out-of-order. Consequently, interrupt and exception handling becomes a vexing problem. The authors identify latency, cost, and performance degradation as factors that must be considered in evaluating the effectiveness of interrupt and exception handling schemes. They then briefly enumerate proposals and implementations for interrupt and exception handling on out-of-order execution processors. An efficient hardware mechanism, the instruction window (IW), and an approach which allows for precise, responsive, and flexible interrupt and exception handling are presented. The implementation of the IW is discussed. The design of an eight-cell IW has been carried out; it can work with a very short machine cycle time. A comparison of all interrupt and exception handling schemes for out-of-order execution processors is also presented.>
Hwa C. Torng, Martin Day
IEEE Trans. Computers2