Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

M. J. Humphries

dblp:63/4061 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › multiple sequence alignment
multiple sequence alignment analysis
0.011995
Protein secondary structure prediction by the analysis of variation and conservation in multiple alignments · Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1995
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction
0.011995
Protein secondary structure prediction by the analysis of variation and conservation in multiple alignments · Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1995
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
secondary structure prediction
0.011995
Protein secondary structure prediction by the analysis of variation and conservation in multiple alignments · Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variation/conservation analysis · 0.0consensus prediction · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1995 Protein secondary structure prediction by the analysis of variation and conservation in multiple alignments
abstract
A number of methods exist for the prediction of protein secondary structure from primary sequence. One method identifies variable charged and conserved hydrophobic residues within large multiple alignments as a means of indicating outside and inside sites respectively in the protein structure. These sites are then manually fitted to secondary structure templates to generate a secondary structure prediction. Using the existing theoretical bases of this method, we present an algorithm (STAMA) which automatically carries out the initial variation/conservation analysis of the alignment. We also test the accuracy of complete predictions carried out by manual fitting of the STAMA-derived assignments to structure templates, using five large multiple alignments each including a protein of known structure. The method was found on average to predict only 57% of residues in the correct secondary structure, and was only as accurate as predictions carried out using the established and automated method of Garnier, Osguthorpe and Robson (1978) applied to a single sequence. When used in conjunction with other secondary structure prediction methods, however, the resulting consensus predictions were found to be very accurate, with 78% of the elements (alpha helices or beta strands) for which a consensus could be obtained being predicted correctly. The algorithm presented here, plus the assessment of the accuracy of prediction generated by this method, should enable this predictive approach to receive informed general use.
D. S. Tuckwell, M. J. Humphries, Andy Brass
Comput. Appl. Biosci.2