EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Juhan Lee
dblp:63/4067
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Recommender systems · 33% Data mining · 33% Web and social media mining · 33% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Operating systems · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommender systems
collaborative filtering |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Who, What, When, and Where: Multi-Dimensional Collaborative Recommendations Using Tensor Factorization on Sparse User-Generated Data · WWW 2015 |
Data mining › multidimensional data analysis › multiway data analysis › tensor analysis
tensor factorization |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Who, What, When, and Where: Multi-Dimensional Collaborative Recommendations Using Tensor Factorization on Sparse User-Generated Data · WWW 2015 |
Operating systems
system administration |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Flight Data Recorder: Monitoring Persistent-State Interactions to Improve Systems Management · OSDI 2006 |
Distributed systems
fault tolerance |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Flight Data Recorder: Monitoring Persistent-State Interactions to Improve Systems Management · OSDI 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
coupled tensor and matrix factorization · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Drops: A multi-producer and multi-consumer data sharing framework with human experienceabstractJust like the internet, Internet of things (IoT) with right standards and technologies, will impact multiple aspects of human lives including Smart Home, Smart Car and Healthcare. Healthcare of things (HoT) would enhance healthcare using the insight provided by sensor data. Healthcare users will subscribe to HoT services that use sensors to get activity data (such as steps walked, hours slept and so on) along with other health vitals (such as heart rate, temperature and weight) to improve user's health. Similarly Smart home users subscribe to a Smart home cloud service that will use data from home sensors. Most of these IoT scenarios have multiple producer, multiple consumer (MPMC) environments, with multiple sensors as producers of data, and multiple IoT services as consumers of data. Current literature and standards provide many protocols for data paths (data transfers) in these MPMC environments that can be used for IoT. However, data paths in MPMC environment must be easily configurable and manageable by end users in order for IoT to be more appealing to a broader user community. Multiple sensors with multiple applications from each manufacturer to control them would not be preferred by users. Also, IoT users need to be able easily choose between multiple options for service providers. In this demonstration, we highlight how user experience perspectives impact the data framework design in MPMC environments, using our drops data framework infrastructure. We hope to have these concepts included IoT standardization efforts. This demonstration was also made at CES at the IEEE booth. Arun Jagatheesan, Senthil Maragathavel, Mouli Sivapurapu, Juhan Lee |
CCNC | 4 |
| 2015 | Who, What, When, and Where: Multi-Dimensional Collaborative Recommendations Using Tensor Factorization on Sparse User-Generated DataabstractGiven the abundance of online information available to mobile users, particularly tourists and weekend travelers, recommender systems that effectively filter this information and suggest interesting participatory opportunities will become increasingly important. Previous work has explored recommending interesting locations; however, users would also benefit from recommendations for activities in which to participate at those locations along with suitable times and days. Thus, systems that provide collaborative recommendations involving multiple dimensions such as location, activities and time would enhance the overall experience of users.The relationship among these dimensions can be modeled by higher-order matrices called tensors which are then solved by tensor factorization. However, these tensors can be extremely sparse. In this paper, we present a system and an approach for performing multi-dimensional collaborative recommendations for Who (User), What (Activity), When (Time) and Where (Location), using tensor factorization on sparse user-generated data. We formulate an objective function which simultaneously factorizes coupled tensors and matrices constructed from heterogeneous data sources. We evaluate our system and approach on large-scale real world data sets consisting of 588,000 Flickr photos collected from three major metro regions in USA. We compare our approach with several state-of-the-art baselines and demonstrate that it outperforms all of them. Preeti Bhargava, Thomas Phan, Juhan Lee |
WWW | 4 |
| 2006 | LiveOps: Systems Management as a Service
Chad Verbowski, Juhan Lee, Roussi Roussev, Yi-Min Wang |
LISA | 2 |
| 2006 | Flight Data Recorder: Monitoring Persistent-State Interactions to Improve Systems Management
Chad Verbowski, Emre Kiciman, Arunvijay Kumar, Brad Daniels, Shan Lu 0001, Juhan Lee, Yi-Min Wang, Roussi Roussev |
OSDI | 6 |