Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Fred M. Tonge

dblp:63/4288 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1988
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Electronic design automation · 54% Storage systems · 36% Distributed systems · 11%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Compilers and program optimization · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › design data management
design database
0.011988
A Context Mechanism to Control Sharing in a Design Database · DAC 1988
Compilers and program optimization › memory optimization
data representation selection
0.011978
Automating the Selection of Implementation Structures · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1978

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pattern recognition · 0.0library retrieval · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1988 A Context Mechanism to Control Sharing in a Design Database
Denise J. Ecklund, Fred M. Tonge
DAC2
1987 DVSS: A Distributed Version Storage Server for CAD Applications
Denise J. Ecklund, Earl F. Ecklund Jr., Robert O. Eifrig, Fred M. Tonge
VLDB4
1978 Automating the Selection of Implementation Structures
abstract
An approach to automating the selection of implementations for the data representations used in a program is presented. Formalisms are developed for specifying data representations and implementation structures. Using these formalisms, algorithms are presented which will recognize the use in a program of known data representations (e. g., stacks, queues, lists, arrays, etc.) so that alternative implementations can be retrieved from a library and which will, for those representations not recognized, generate alternative implementations with a wide range of space-time tradeoffs. Experience with using these algorithms indicates they are reasonably successful, although there are several problems that must be solved before automatic implementation selection systems will be practical.
Lawrence A. Rowe, Fred M. Tonge
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.2