Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Peter S. Landweber

dblp:63/456 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1964
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Automata and formal languages · 56% Computational complexity · 44%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automata and formal languages
formal grammars
0.021964
Decision Problems of Phrase-Structure Grammars · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1964
Three Theorems on Phrase Structure Grammars of Type 1 · Inf. Control. 1963
Automata and formal languages › formal grammars
phrase structure grammars
0.021964
Decision Problems of Phrase-Structure Grammars · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1964
Three Theorems on Phrase Structure Grammars of Type 1 · Inf. Control. 1963
Computational complexity
decidability
0.011964
Decision Problems of Phrase-Structure Grammars · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1964
Computational complexity › decidability
post correspondence problem
0.011964
Decision Problems of Phrase-Structure Grammars · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1964
Computational complexity
undecidability
0.011964
Decision Problems of Phrase-Structure Grammars · IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 1964
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1964 Decision Problems of Phrase-Structure Grammars
abstract
Phrase-structure grammars were first introduced and studied by Chomsky as devices for generating the sentences of a language. By means of increasingly heavy restrictions on the productions (rewriting rules), four types of grammars were singled out by Chomsky: type 0 (unrestricted), type 1 (context-dependent), type 2 (context-free), and type 3 (finite state). In this paper, a number of decision problems are resolved for these classes of grammars and the languages they generate, largely in the negative. A table of decision problems for grammars of the four different types is presented. This table indicates the problems which have been found to be decidable or undecidable. The ambiguity problem for type 3 grammars and the emptiness and infiniteness problems for type 2 grammars are shown to be decidable. A known unsolvable problem, the Post correspondence problem, is the key to the undecidability proofs which are given. For type 2 grammars, the ambiguity and equivalence problems are proved undecidable; the emptiness and infiniteness problems for type 1 grammars are shown to be undecidable. There is no algorithm to decide whether a language of a given type can be generated by a grammar of a more restricted type. The results on type 2 grammars were first obtained by Bar-Hillel, Perles, and Shamir.
Peter S. Landweber
IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput.1
1963 Three Theorems on Phrase Structure Grammars of Type 1
Peter S. Landweber
Inf. Control.1