EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Richard D. Gill
dblp:63/4912 · also Richard David Gill
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
0000-0001-5821-9986ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Quantum computing and quantum information · 87% Information theory · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum foundations |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | The statistical strength of nonlocality proofs · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2005 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum foundations
quantum nonlocality |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | The statistical strength of nonlocality proofs · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2005 |
Information theory › information measures › divergence measures
kullback-leibler divergence |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | The statistical strength of nonlocality proofs · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical hypothesis testing · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | The statistical strength of nonlocality proofsabstractThere exist numerous proofs of Bell's theorem, stating that quantum mechanics is incompatible with local realistic theories of nature. Here the strength of such nonlocality proofs is defined in terms of the amount of evidence against local realism provided by the corresponding experiments. Statistical considerations show that the amount of evidence should be measured by the Kullback-Leibler (KL) or relative entropy divergence. The statistical strength of the following proofs is determined: Bell's original proof and Peres' optimized variant of it, and proofs by Clauser, Horne, Shimony, and Holt (CHSH), Hardy, Mermin, and Greenberger, Horne, and Zeilinger (GHZ). The GHZ proof is at least four and a half times stronger than all other proofs, while of the two-party proofs, the one of CHSH is the strongest. Wim van Dam, Richard D. Gill, Peter Grünwald |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 2 |