Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Richard D. Gill

dblp:63/4912 · also Richard David Gill · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
0000-0001-5821-9986ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Quantum computing and quantum information · 87% Information theory · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum foundations
0.112005
The statistical strength of nonlocality proofs · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2005
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum foundations
quantum nonlocality
0.112005
The statistical strength of nonlocality proofs · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2005
Information theory › information measures › divergence measures
kullback-leibler divergence
0.012005
The statistical strength of nonlocality proofs · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical hypothesis testing · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 The statistical strength of nonlocality proofs
abstract
There exist numerous proofs of Bell's theorem, stating that quantum mechanics is incompatible with local realistic theories of nature. Here the strength of such nonlocality proofs is defined in terms of the amount of evidence against local realism provided by the corresponding experiments. Statistical considerations show that the amount of evidence should be measured by the Kullback-Leibler (KL) or relative entropy divergence. The statistical strength of the following proofs is determined: Bell's original proof and Peres' optimized variant of it, and proofs by Clauser, Horne, Shimony, and Holt (CHSH), Hardy, Mermin, and Greenberger, Horne, and Zeilinger (GHZ). The GHZ proof is at least four and a half times stronger than all other proofs, while of the two-party proofs, the one of CHSH is the strongest.
Wim van Dam, Richard D. Gill, Peter Grünwald
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2