Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Harald Ganster
dblp:63/5218
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Security and privacy · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Biometric security · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Biometric security
biometric database |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | The Multiscenario Multienvironment BioSecure Multimodal Database (BMDB) · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2010 |
Biometric security
biometric recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | The Multiscenario Multienvironment BioSecure Multimodal Database (BMDB) · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2010 |
Biometric security › multi-biometric systems
multimodal biometrics |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | The Multiscenario Multienvironment BioSecure Multimodal Database (BMDB) · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2010 |
Biometric security
biometric performance evaluation |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Benchmarking quality-dependent and cost-sensitive score-level multimodal biometric fusion algorithms · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2009 |
Biometric security › biometric fusion
multimodal biometric fusion |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Benchmarking quality-dependent and cost-sensitive score-level multimodal biometric fusion algorithms · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2009 |
Biometric security › biometric fusion
score-level fusion |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Benchmarking quality-dependent and cost-sensitive score-level multimodal biometric fusion algorithms · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multimodal fusion · 0.1baseline evaluation · 0.1support vector machine fusion · 0.1quality measurement · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Gaze-based Human Factors Measurements for the Evaluation of Intuitive Human-Robot Collaboration in Real-timeabstractHuman attention processes play a key role in optimizations of human-robot collaboration (HRC) systems. We describe a novel framework to assess the human state primarily by gaze and in real-time by deriving parameters about situation awareness which is fundamental in the evaluation of collaboration. Comprehensive experiments on HRC were conducted with typical tasks including collaborative pick-and-place in a lab based prototypical manufacturing environment. The methodology measures executive functions and situation awareness in the HRC task in real-time for the purpose of human factors-based performance evaluation in HRC applications. Lucas Paletta, Martin Pszeida, Harald Ganster, Ferdinand Fuhrmann, Wolfgang Weiss, Stefan Ladstätter, Amir Dini, Sandra Murg, Harald Mayer, Inka Brijacak, Bernhard Reiterer |
ETFA | 3 |
| 2010 | The Multiscenario Multienvironment BioSecure Multimodal Database (BMDB)abstractA new multimodal biometric database designed and acquired within the framework of the European BioSecure Network of Excellence is presented. It is comprised of more than 600 individuals acquired simultaneously in three scenarios: 1) over the Internet, 2) in an office environment with desktop PC, and 3) in indoor/outdoor environments with mobile portable hardware. The three scenarios include a common part of audio/video data. Also, signature and fingerprint data have been acquired both with desktop PC and mobile portable hardware. Additionally, hand and iris data were acquired in the second scenario using desktop PC. Acquisition has been conducted by 11 European institutions. Additional features of the BioSecure Multimodal Database (BMDB) are: two acquisition sessions, several sensors in certain modalities, balanced gender and age distributions, multimodal realistic scenarios with simple and quick tasks per modality, cross-European diversity, availability of demographic data, and compatibility with other multimodal databases. The novel acquisition conditions of the BMDB allow us to perform new challenging research and evaluation of either monomodal or multimodal biometric systems, as in the recent BioSecure Multimodal Evaluation campaign. A description of this campaign including baseline results of individual modalities from the new database is also given. The database is expected to be available for research purposes through the BioSecure Association during 2008. Javier Ortega-Garcia, Julian Fierrez, Fernando Alonso-Fernandez, Javier Galbally, Manuel R. Freire, Joaquín González-Rodríguez, Carmen García-Mateo, José Luis Alba-Castro, Elisardo González-Agulla, Enrique Otero Muras, Sonia Garcia-Salicetti, Lorène Allano, Van-Bao Ly, Bernadette Dorizzi, Josef Kittler, Thirimachos Bourlai, Norman Poh, Farzin Deravi, Ming W. R. Ng, Michael C. Fairhurst, Jean Hennebert, Andreas Humm, Massimo Tistarelli, Linda Brodo, Jonas Richiardi, Andrzej Drygajlo, Harald Ganster, Federico Sukno, Sri-Kaushik Pavani, Alejandro F. Frangi, Lale Akarun, Arman Savran |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 27 |
| 2009 | Benchmarking quality-dependent and cost-sensitive score-level multimodal biometric fusion algorithmsabstractAutomatically verifying the identity of a person by means of biometrics (e.g., face and fingerprint) is an important application in our day-to-day activities such as accessing banking services and security control in airports. To increase the system reliability, several biometric devices are often used. Such a combined system is known as a multimodal biometric system. This paper reports a benchmarking study carried out within the framework of the BioSecure DS2 (Access Control) evaluation campaign organized by the University of Surrey, involving face, fingerprint, and iris biometrics for person authentication, targeting the application of physical access control in a medium-size establishment with some 500 persons. While multimodal biometrics is a well-investigated subject in the literature, there exists no benchmark for a fusion algorithm comparison. Working towards this goal, we designed two sets of experiments: quality-dependent and cost-sensitive evaluation. The quality-dependent evaluation aims at assessing how well fusion algorithms can perform under changing quality of raw biometric images principally due to change of devices. The cost-sensitive evaluation, on the other hand, investigates how well a fusion algorithm can perform given restricted computation and in the presence of software and hardware failures, resulting in errors such as failure-to-acquire and failure-to-match. Since multiple capturing devices are available, a fusion algorithm should be able to handle this nonideal but nevertheless realistic scenario. In both evaluations, each fusion algorithm is provided with scores from each biometric comparison subsystem as well as the quality measures of both the template and the query data. The response to the call of the evaluation campaign proved very encouraging, with the submission of 22 fusion systems. To the best of our knowledge, this campaign is the first attempt to benchmark quality-based multimodal fusion algorithms. In the presence of changing image quality which may be due to a change of acquisition devices and/or device capturing configurations, we observe that the top performing fusion algorithms are those that exploit automatically derived quality measurements. Our evaluation also suggests that while using all the available biometric sensors can definitely increase the fusion performance, this comes at the expense of increased cost in terms of acquisition time, computation time, the physical cost of hardware, and its maintenance cost. As demonstrated in our experiments, a promising solution which minimizes the composite cost is sequential fusion, where a fusion algorithm sequentially uses match scores until a desired confidence is reached, or until all the match scores are exhausted, before outputting the final combined score. Norman Poh, Thirimachos Bourlai, Josef Kittler, Lorène Allano, Fernando Alonso-Fernandez, Onkar Ambekar, John P. Baker, Bernadette Dorizzi, Omolara Fatukasi, Julian Fierrez, Harald Ganster, Javier Ortega-Garcia, Donald E. Maurer, Albert Ali Salah, Tobias Scheidat, Claus Vielhauer |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. | 11 |
| 2001 | Automated Melanoma RecognitionabstractA system for the computerized analysis of images obtained from ELM has been developed to enhance the early recognition of malignant melanoma. As an initial step, the binary mask of the skin lesion is determined by several basic segmentation algorithms together with a fusion strategy. A set of features containing shape and radiometric features as well as local and global parameters is calculated to describe the malignancy of a lesion. Significant features are then selected from this set by application of statistical feature subset selection methods. The final kNN classification delivers a sensitivity of 87% with a specificity of 92%. Harald Ganster, Axel Pinz, Reinhard Röhrer, Ernst Wildling, Michael Binder, Harald Kittler |
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging | 1 |
| 1998 | Feature selection in melanoma recognitionabstractMelanoma, one of the most aggressive types of cancer, can be healed, if recognized in early stages. In order to automate the early recognition of skin cancer; a system that analyses digital epiluminescence microscopic images is used. After segmentation, 33 features representing shape and radiometric properties are calculated. In the paper the quality of the features is evaluated by applying several feature selection methods. The results show that with each selection method the feature set can be reduced to dimension four with nearly no loss of information. Results with classification rates of up to 75% are achieved and relations between selected features and medical criteria are observed. Reinhard Röhrer, Harald Ganster, Axel Pinz, Michael Binder |
ICPR | 2 |
| 1996 | Active fusion using Bayesian networks applied to multi-temporal remote sensing imageryabstractImage processing applications and especially those in the area of remote sensing are often characterized by a high degree of complexity. We introduce a general framework, called 'active fusion', that actively selects and combines information from multiple sources in order to obtain a reliable result at reasonable costs. A sample implementation of parts of the framework is given using Bayesian networks and decision theoretic techniques for the task of agricultural field classification. This experiment shows a significant reduction in the number of information sources required for a reliable decision. Manfred Prantl, Harald Ganster, Axel Pinz |
ICPR | 2 |
| 1996 | Active fusion - A new method applied to remote sensing image interpretation
Axel Pinz, Manfred Prantl, Harald Ganster, Hermann Borotschnig |
Pattern Recognit. Lett. | 3 |
| 1995 | Affine Matching of Intermediate Symbolic Representations
Axel Pinz, Manfred Prantl, Harald Ganster |
CAIP | 3 |