Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Till Stegers
dblp:63/6123
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › encryption
deterministic encryption |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Deterministic Encryption with the Thorp Shuffle · J. Cryptol. 2018 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › encryption › property-preserving encryption
format-preserving encryption |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | How to Encipher Messages on a Small Domain · CRYPTO 2009 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Deterministic Encryption with the Thorp Shuffle
Ben Morris 0001, Phillip Rogaway, Till Stegers |
J. Cryptol. | 3 |
| 2009 | How to Encipher Messages on a Small Domain
Ben Morris 0001, Phillip Rogaway, Till Stegers |
CRYPTO | 3 |
| 2009 | Authentication without Elision: Partially Specified Protocols, Associated Data, and Cryptographic Models Described by CodeabstractSpecification documents for real-world authentication protocols typically mandate some aspects of a protocol's behavior but leave other features optional or undefined. In addition, real-world schemes often include parameter negotiations, authenticate associated data, and support a multiplicity of options. The cryptographic community has routinely elided such matters from our definitions, schemes, and proofs. We propose encompassing them by explicitly modeling the presence of unspecified protocol functionality. To demonstrate, we provide a new treatment for mutual authentication in the public-key setting, doing this in the computational cryptographic tradition. In our model, compactly described in pseudocode, a protocol core (PC) will call out to protocol details (PD), but, for defining security, such calls will be serviced by the adversary. Parties accepting an authentication exchange will output a string of associated data, the value of which may be determined by the PD calls. We illustrate the approach by re-proving security for the Needham-Schroeder-Lowe public-key protocol, but extended in a manner that would be typical were the mechanism embedded in a real-world standard. Phillip Rogaway, Till Stegers |
CSF | 2 |