Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alessandro Mariotti
dblp:63/7880
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking
symbolic model checking |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | The nuXmv Symbolic Model Checker · CAV 2014 |
Requirements engineering and software design
requirements validation |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Supporting Requirements Validation: The EuRailCheck Tool · ASE 2009 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
model checking |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Supporting Requirements Validation: The EuRailCheck Tool · ASE 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
formal methods · 0.2UML · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | The nuXmv Symbolic Model Checker
Roberto Cavada, Alessandro Cimatti, Michele Dorigatti, Alberto Griggio, Alessandro Mariotti, Andrea Micheli, Sergio Mover, Marco Roveri, Stefano Tonetta |
CAV | 5 |
| 2009 | Supporting Requirements Validation: The EuRailCheck ToolabstractWe present the EuRailCheck tool, which supports the formalization and the validation of requirements, based on the use of formal methods. The tool allows the user to analyze the requirements in natural language and to categorize and structure them. It allows to formalize the requirements into a subset of UML enriched with static and temporal constraints for which we defined a formal semantics. Finally, the tool allows to apply model checking techniques specialized for the validation of formal requirements. The tool has been developed and validated within a project funded by the European Railway Agency for the validation of the European Train Control System specification. By now, the tool has been successfully used by about thirty railway experts of different companies. Roberto Cavada, Alessandro Cimatti, Alessandro Mariotti, Cristian Mattarei, Andrea Micheli, Sergio Mover, Marco Pensallorto, Marco Roveri, Angelo Susi, Stefano Tonetta |
ASE | 3 |