Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Frederic Dijoux

dblp:63/8365 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Robot navigation and mapping · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Wearable and physiological sensing · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Wearable and physiological sensing
motion capture
0.112012
Activity-Based Estimation of Human Trajectories · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2012
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › SLAM
graph-based SLAM
0.112010
Mapping indoor environments based on human activity · ICRA 2010
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › environment mapping
indoor mapping
0.112010
Mapping indoor environments based on human activity · ICRA 2010
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
SLAM
0.112010
Mapping indoor environments based on human activity · ICRA 2010
Wearable and physiological sensing › motion capture
inertial motion capture
0.012010
Mapping indoor environments based on human activity · ICRA 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multi-hypothesis tracking · 0.3inertial measurement unit · 0.3multi-hypothesis data association · 0.2graph optimization · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Activity-Based Estimation of Human Trajectories
abstract
We present a novel approach to incrementally determine the trajectory of a person in 3-D based on its motions and activities in real time. In our algorithm, we estimate the motions and activities of the user given the data that are obtained from a motion capture suit equipped with several inertial measurement units. These activities include walking up and down staircases, as well as opening and closing doors. We interpret the first two types of activities as motion constraints and door-handling events as landmark detections in a graph-based simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) framework. Since we cannot distinguish between individual doors, we employ a multihypothesis tracking approach on top of the SLAM procedure to deal with the high data-association uncertainty. As a result, we are able to accurately and robustly recover the trajectory of the person. Additionally, we present an algorithm to build approximate geometrical and topological maps based on the estimated trajectory and detected activities. We evaluate our approach in practical experiments that are carried out with different subjects and in various environments.
Slawomir Grzonka, Andreas Karwath, Frederic Dijoux, Wolfram Burgard
IEEE Trans. Robotics3
2010 Mapping indoor environments based on human activity
abstract
We present a novel approach to build approximate maps of structured environments utilizing human motion and activity. Our approach uses data recorded with a data suit which is equipped with several IMUs to detect movements of a person and door opening and closing events. In our approach we interpret the movements as motion constraints and door handling events as landmark detections in a graph-based SLAM framework. As we cannot distinguish between individual doors, we employ a multi-hypothesis approach on top of the SLAM system to deal with the high data-association uncertainty. As a result, our approach is able to accurately and robustly recover the trajectory of the person. We additionally take advantage of the fact that people traverse free space and that doors separate rooms to recover the geometric structure of the environment after the graph optimization. We evaluate our approach in several experiments carried out with different users and in environments of different types.
Slawomir Grzonka, Frederic Dijoux, Andreas Karwath, Wolfram Burgard
ICRA2