Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Wahid Bhimji
dblp:63/9223
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-6213-8617ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 36% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 29% Deep learning architectures and training · 16% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
High-performance computing · 38% Distributed systems · 36% Parallel and multicore computing · 27% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational science and engineering
high energy physics |
1.2 | 2 | 2025 | FAIR Universe HiggsML Uncertainty Dataset and Competition · NeurIPS 2025 Efficient Probabilistic Inference in the Quest for Physics Beyond the Standard Model · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation › confidence estimation
confidence interval estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FAIR Universe HiggsML Uncertainty Dataset and Competition · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FAIR Universe HiggsML Uncertainty Dataset and Competition · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
probabilistic programming |
0.8 | 2 | 2019 | Etalumis: bringing probabilistic programming to scientific simulators at scale · SC 2019 Efficient Probabilistic Inference in the Quest for Physics Beyond the Standard Model · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › pre-training and adaptation
pre-training and fine-tuning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Towards Foundation Models for Scientific Machine Learning: Characterizing Scaling and Transfer Behavior · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
scientific machine learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Towards Foundation Models for Scientific Machine Learning: Characterizing Scaling and Transfer Behavior · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computational science and engineering
foundation models |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Towards Foundation Models for Scientific Machine Learning: Characterizing Scaling and Transfer Behavior · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
PDE learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Towards Foundation Models for Scientific Machine Learning: Characterizing Scaling and Transfer Behavior · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computational science and engineering
scientific machine learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Towards Foundation Models for Scientific Machine Learning: Characterizing Scaling and Transfer Behavior · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Etalumis: bringing probabilistic programming to scientific simulators at scale · SC 2019 |
Distributed systems › distributed machine learning
distributed training |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Etalumis: bringing probabilistic programming to scientific simulators at scale · SC 2019 |
Parallel and multicore computing
distributed deep learning training |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Deep learning at 15PF: supervised and semi-supervised classification for scientific data · SC 2017 |
High-performance computing
large-scale training |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Deep learning at 15PF: supervised and semi-supervised classification for scientific data · SC 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › density estimation
density ratio estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | FAIR Universe HiggsML Uncertainty Dataset and Competition · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
scaling behavior |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Towards Foundation Models for Scientific Machine Learning: Characterizing Scaling and Transfer Behavior · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Efficient Probabilistic Inference in the Quest for Physics Beyond the Standard Model · NeurIPS 2019 |
High-performance computing
scientific computing systems |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Etalumis: bringing probabilistic programming to scientific simulators at scale · SC 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
density ratio estimation · 1.7contrastive normalizing flows · 1.7markov chain monte carlo · 1.5transfer learning · 1.3pre-training · 1.3fine-tuning · 1.3sequential importance sampling · 0.8inference compilation · 0.8deep recurrent neural network · 0.83DCNN-LSTM · 0.8semi-supervised learning · 0.6convolutional neural network · 0.6PyTorch-MPI · 0.4synchronous and asynchronous training · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | FAIR Universe HiggsML Uncertainty Dataset and CompetitionabstractThe FAIR Universe – HiggsML Uncertainty Challenge focused on measuring the physical properties of elementary particles with imperfect simulators. Participants were required to compute and report confidence intervals for a parameter of interest regarding the Higgs boson while accounting for various systematic (epistemic) uncertainties. The dataset is a tabular dataset of 28 features and 280 million instances. Each instance represents a simulated proton-proton collision as observed at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider in Geneva, Switzerland. The features of these simulations were chosen to capture key characteristics of different types of particles. These include primary attributes, such as the energy and three-dimensional momentum of the particles, as well as derived attributes, which are calculated from the primary ones using domain-specific knowledge. Additionally, a label feature designates each instance’s type of proton-proton collision, distinguishing the Higgs boson events of interest from three background sources. As outlined in this paper, the permanent dataset release allows long-term benchmarking of new techniques. The leading submissions, including Contrastive Normalising Flows and Density Ratios estimation through classification, are described. Our challenge has brought together the physics and machine learning communities to advance our understanding and methodologies in handling systematic uncertainties within AI techniques. Wahid Bhimji, Ragansu Chakkappai, Po-Wen Chang, Yuan-Tang Chou, Sascha Diefenbacher, Jordan Dudley, Ibrahim Elsharkawy, Steven Farrell, Aishik Ghosh, Cristina Giordano, Isabelle Guyon, Christopher J. Harris 0004, Yota Hashizume, Shih-Chieh Hsu, Elham E Khoda, Claudius Krause, Benjamin Nachman, David Rousseau, Robert Schöfbeck, Maryam Shooshtari, Dennis Schwarz, Daohan Wang |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Towards Foundation Models for Scientific Machine Learning: Characterizing Scaling and Transfer BehaviorabstractPre-trained machine learning (ML) models have shown great performance for a
wide range of applications, in particular in natural language processing (NLP)
and computer vision (CV). Here, we study how pre-training could be used for
scientific machine learning (SciML) applications, specifically in the context of
transfer learning. We study the transfer behavior of these models as (i) the pretrained
model size is scaled, (ii) the downstream training dataset size is scaled,
(iii) the physics parameters are systematically pushed out of distribution, and (iv)
how a single model pre-trained on a mixture of different physics problems can
be adapted to various downstream applications. We find that—when fine-tuned
appropriately—transfer learning can help reach desired accuracy levels with orders
of magnitude fewer downstream examples (across different tasks that can even be
out-of-distribution) than training from scratch, with consistent behaviour across a
wide range of downstream examples. We also find that fine-tuning these models
yields more performance gains as model size increases, compared to training from
scratch on new downstream tasks. These results hold for a broad range of PDE
learning tasks. All in all, our results demonstrate the potential of the “pre-train and
fine-tune” paradigm for SciML problems, demonstrating a path towards building
SciML foundation models. Our code is available as open-source. Shashank Subramanian, Peter Harrington, Kurt Keutzer, Wahid Bhimji, Dmitriy Morozov, Michael W. Mahoney, Amir Gholami |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2019 | Efficient Probabilistic Inference in the Quest for Physics Beyond the Standard ModelabstractWe present a novel probabilistic programming framework that couples directly to existing large-scale simulators through a cross-platform probabilistic execution protocol, which allows general-purpose inference engines to record and control random number draws within simulators in a language-agnostic way. The execution of existing simulators as probabilistic programs enables highly interpretable posterior inference in the structured model defined by the simulator code base. We demonstrate the technique in particle physics, on a scientifically accurate simulation of the tau lepton decay, which is a key ingredient in establishing the properties of the Higgs boson. Inference efficiency is achieved via inference compilation where a deep recurrent neural network is trained to parameterize proposal distributions and control the stochastic simulator in a sequential importance sampling scheme, at a fraction of the computational cost of a Markov chain Monte Carlo baseline. Atilim Günes Baydin, Wahid Bhimji, Lukas Heinrich, Saeid Naderiparizi, Andreas Munk 0001, Jialin Liu 0002, Bradley Gram-Hansen, Gilles Louppe, Lawrence Meadows, Philip Torr 0001, Victor W. Lee, Kyle Cranmer, Prabhat, Frank D. Wood |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2019 | Etalumis: bringing probabilistic programming to scientific simulators at scaleabstractProbabilistic programming languages (PPLs) are receiving widespread attention for performing Bayesian inference in complex generative models. However, applications to science remain limited because of the impracticability of rewriting complex scientific simulators in a PPL, the computational cost of inference, and the lack of scalable implementations. To address these, we present a novel PPL framework that couples directly to existing scientific simulators through a cross-platform probabilistic execution protocol and provides Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and deep-learning-based inference compilation (IC) engines for tractable inference. To guide IC inference, we perform distributed training of a dynamic 3DCNN-LSTM architecture with a PyTorch-MPI-based framework on 1,024 32-core CPU nodes of the Cori supercomputer with a global mini-batch size of 128k: achieving a performance of 450 Tflop/s through enhancements to PyTorch. We demonstrate a Large Hadron Collider (LHC) use-case with the C++ Sherpa simulator and achieve the largest-scale posterior inference in a Turing-complete PPL. Atilim Günes Baydin, Wahid Bhimji, Lukas Heinrich, Lawrence Meadows, Jialin Liu 0002, Andreas Munk 0001, Saeid Naderiparizi, Bradley Gram-Hansen, Gilles Louppe, Mingfei Ma, Philip Torr 0001, Victor W. Lee, Kyle Cranmer, Prabhat, Frank D. Wood |
SC | 3 |
| 2018 | Graph Neural Networks for IceCube Signal ClassificationabstractTasks involving the analysis of geometric (graph-and manifold-structured) data have recently gained prominence in the machine learning community, giving birth to a rapidly developing field of geometric deep learning. In this work, we leverage graph neural networks to improve signal detection in the IceCube neutrino observatory. The IceCube detector array is modeled as a graph, where vertices are sensors and edges are a learned function of the sensors spatial coordinates. As only a subset of IceCubes sensors is active during a given observation, we note the adaptive nature of our GNN, wherein computation is restricted to the input signal support. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our GNN architecture on a task classifying IceCube events, where it outperforms both a traditional physics-based method as well as classical 3D convolution neural networks. Nicholas Choma, Federico Monti, Lisa Gerhardt, Tomasz Palczewski, Zahra Ronaghi, Prabhat, Wahid Bhimji, Michael M. Bronstein, Spencer R. Klein, Joan Bruna |
ICMLA | 7 |
| 2017 | Deep learning at 15PF: supervised and semi-supervised classification for scientific dataabstractThis paper presents the first, 15-PetaFLOP Deep Learning system for solving scientific pattern classification problems on contemporary HPC architectures. We develop supervised convolutional architectures for discriminating signals in high-energy physics data as well as semi-supervised architectures for localizing and classifying extreme weather in climate data. Our Intelcaffe-based implementation obtains ~2TFLOP/s on a single Cori Phase-II Xeon-Phi node. We use a hybrid strategy employing synchronous node-groups, while using asynchronous communication across groups. We use this strategy to scale training of a single model to ~9600 Xeon-Phi nodes; obtaining peak performance of 11.73-15.07 PFLOP/s and sustained performance of 11.41-13.27 PFLOP/s. At scale, our HEP architecture produces state-of-the-art classification accuracy on a dataset with 10M images, exceeding that achieved by selections on high-level physics-motivated features. Our semi-supervised architecture successfully extracts weather patterns in a 15TB climate dataset. Our results demonstrate that Deep Learning can be optimized and scaled effectively on many-core, HPC systems. Thorsten Kurth, Jian Zhang 0049, Nadathur Satish, Evan Racah, Ioannis Mitliagkas, Md. Mostofa Ali Patwary, Tareq M. Malas, Narayanan Sundaram, Wahid Bhimji, Mikhail Smorkalov, Jack Deslippe, Mikhail Shiryaev, Srinivas Sridharan 0002, Prabhat, Pradeep Dubey |
SC | 9 |
| 2016 | Revealing Fundamental Physics from the Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment Using Deep Neural NetworksabstractExperiments in particle physics produce enormous quantities of data that must be analyzed and interpreted by teams of physicists. This analysis is often exploratory, where scientists are unable to enumerate the possible types of signal prior to performing the experiment. Thus, tools for summarizing, clustering, visualizing and classifying high-dimensional data are essential. In this work, we show that meaningful physical content can be revealed by transforming the raw data into a learned high-level representation using deep neural networks, with measurements taken at the Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment as a case study. We further show how convolutional deep neural networks can provide an effective classification filter with greater than 97% accuracy across different classes of physics events, significantly better than other machine learning approaches. Evan Racah, Seyoon Ko, Peter J. Sadowski, Wahid Bhimji, Craig Tull, Sang-Yun Oh, Pierre Baldi, Prabhat |
ICMLA | 4 |
| 2016 | PANDA: Extreme Scale Parallel K-Nearest Neighbor on Distributed ArchitecturesabstractComputing k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) is one of the core kernels used in many machine learning, data mining and scientific computing applications. Although kd-tree based O(log n) algorithms have been proposed for computing KNN, due to its inherent sequentiality, linear algorithms are being used in practice. This limits the applicability of such methods to millions of data points, with limited scalability for Big Data analytics challenges in the scientific domain. In this paper, we present parallel and highly optimized kd*tree based KNN algorithms (both construction and querying) suitable for distributed architectures. Our algorithm includes novel approaches for pruning search space and improving load balancing and partitioning among nodes and threads. Using TB-sized datasets from three science applications: astrophysics, plasma physics, and particle physics, we show that our implementation can construct kd-tree of 189 billion particles in 48 seconds on utilizing ~50,000 cores. We also demonstrate computation of KNN of 19 billion queries in 12 seconds. We demonstrate almost linear speedup both for shared and distributed memory computers. Our algorithms outperforms earlier implementations by more than order of magnitude, thereby radically improving the applicability of our implementation to state-of-the-art Big Data analytics problems. Md. Mostofa Ali Patwary, Nadathur Satish, Narayanan Sundaram, Jialin Liu 0002, Peter J. Sadowski, Evan Racah, Surendra Byna, Craig Tull, Wahid Bhimji, Prabhat, Pradeep Dubey |
IPDPS | 9 |