EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Robby Goetschalckx
dblp:63/965
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 6 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 8 · 5 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 71% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 17% Learning theory · 8% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning |
0.4 | 2 | 2015 | Active Imitation Learning of Hierarchical Policies · IJCAI 2015 Imitation Learning with Demonstrations and Shaping Rewards · AAAI 2014 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning › interactive imitation learning
active imitation learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Active Imitation Learning of Hierarchical Policies · IJCAI 2015 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › preference learning
coactive learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Multitask Coactive Learning · IJCAI 2015 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › hierarchical reinforcement learning
hierarchical policy |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Active Imitation Learning of Hierarchical Policies · IJCAI 2015 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Coactive Learning for Locally Optimal Problem Solving · AAAI 2014 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward design
reward shaping |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Imitation Learning with Demonstrations and Shaping Rewards · AAAI 2014 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian nonparametric model |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Continuous Correlated Beta Processes · IJCAI 2011 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian nonparametric model
beta process |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Continuous Correlated Beta Processes · IJCAI 2011 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian nonparametric model
dirichlet process |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Continuous Correlated Beta Processes · IJCAI 2011 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
bayesian reinforcement learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Bayesian Real-Time Dynamic Programming · IJCAI 2009 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Bayesian Real-Time Dynamic Programming · IJCAI 2009 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
real-time dynamic programming |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Bayesian Real-Time Dynamic Programming · IJCAI 2009 |
Data mining › predictive modeling › regression
linear regression |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Cost-Sensitive Parsimonious Linear Regression · ICDM 2008 |
Data mining › predictive modeling
regression |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Cost-Sensitive Parsimonious Linear Regression · ICDM 2008 |
Mathematical optimization
sparse optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Cost-Sensitive Parsimonious Linear Regression · ICDM 2008 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › safe reinforcement learning
constrained policy optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | On Policy Learning in Restricted Policy Spaces · AAAI 2007 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | On Policy Learning in Restricted Policy Spaces · AAAI 2007 |
Health and well-being technologies › rehabilitation
stroke rehabilitation |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Continuous Correlated Beta Processes · IJCAI 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
cost-sensitive learning · 0.4bayesian inference · 0.3kernel function · 0.2coactive learning · 0.2active learning · 0.2shaping reward function · 0.2perceptron · 0.2passive-aggressive updates · 0.2least angle regression · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Adaptive Submodularity with Varying Query Sets: An Application to Active Multi-label LearningabstractAdaptive submodular optimization, where a sequence of items is selected adaptively to optimize a submodular function, has been found to have many applications from sensor placement to active learning. In the current paper, we extend this work to the setting of multiple queries at each time step, where the set of available queries is randomly constrained. A primary contribution of this paper is to prove the first near optimal approximation bound for a greedy policy in this setting. A natural application of this framework is to crowd-sourced active learning problem where the set of available experts and examples might vary randomly. We instantiate the new framework for multi-label learning and evaluate it in multiple benchmark domains with promising results. Alan Fern, Robby Goetschalckx, Mandana Hamidi-Haines, Prasad Tadepalli |
ALT | 2 |
| 2015 | Multitask Coactive Learning
Robby Goetschalckx, Alan Fern, Prasad Tadepalli |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2015 | Active Imitation Learning of Hierarchical Policies
Mandana Hamidi-Haines, Prasad Tadepalli, Robby Goetschalckx, Alan Fern |
IJCAI | 3 |
| 2014 | Coactive Learning for Locally Optimal Problem SolvingabstractCoactive learning is an online problem solving setting where the solutions provided by a solver are interactively improved by a domain expert, which in turn drives learning. In this paper we extend the study of coactive learning to problems where obtaining a globally optimal or near-optimal solution may be intractable or where an expert can only be expected to make small, local improvements to a candidate solution. The goal of learning in this new setting is to minimize the cost as measured by the expert effort over time. We first establish theoretical bounds on the average cost of the existing coactive Perceptron algorithm. In addition, we consider new online algorithms that use cost-sensitive and Passive-Aggressive (PA) updates, showing similar or improved theoretical bounds. We provide an empirical evaluation of the learners in various domains, which show that the Perceptron based algorithms are quite effective and that unlike the case for online classification, the PA algorithms do not yield significant performance gains. Robby Goetschalckx, Alan Fern, Prasad Tadepalli |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2014 | Imitation Learning with Demonstrations and Shaping RewardsabstractImitation Learning (IL) is a popular approach for teaching behavior policies to agents by demonstrating the desired target policy. While the approach has lead to many successes, IL often requires a large set of demonstrations to achieve robust learning, which can be expensive for the teacher. In this paper, we consider a novel approach to improve the learning efficiency of IL by providing a shaping reward function in addition to the usual demonstrations. Shaping rewards are numeric functions of states (and possibly actions) that are generally easily specified, and capture general principles of desired behavior, without necessarily completely specifying the behavior. Shaping rewards have been used extensively in reinforcement learning, but have been seldom considered for IL, though they are often easy to specify. Our main contribution is to propose an IL approach that learns from both shaping rewards and demonstrations. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach across several IL problems, even when the shaping reward is not fully consistent with the demonstrations. Kshitij Judah, Alan Fern, Prasad Tadepalli, Robby Goetschalckx |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2011 | Continuous Correlated Beta ProcessesabstractIn this paper we consider a (possibly continuous) space of Bernoulli experiments. We assume that the Bernoulli distributions are correlated. All evidence data comes in the form of successful or failed experiments at different points. Current state-ofthe-art methods for expressing a distribution over a continuum of Bernoulli distributions use logistic Gaussian processes or Gaussian copula processes. However, both of these require computationally expensive matrix operations (cubic in the general case). We introduce a more intuitive approach, directly correlating beta distributions by sharing evidence between them according to a kernel function, an approach which has linear time complexity. The approach can easily be extended to multiple outcomes, giving a continuous correlated Dirichlet process, and can be used for both classification and learning the actual probabilities of the Bernoulli distributions. We show results for a number of data sets, as well as a case-study where a mixture of continuous beta processes is used as part of an automated stroke rehabilitation system. 1 Robby Goetschalckx, Pascal Poupart, Jesse Hoey |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2009 | Bayesian Real-Time Dynamic Programming
Scott Sanner, Robby Goetschalckx, Kurt Driessens, Guy Shani |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 2008 | Reinforcement Learning with the Use of Costly FeaturesabstractA common solution approach to reinforcement learning problems with large state spaces (where value functions cannot be represented exactly) is to compute an approximation of the value function in terms of state features. However, little attention has been paid to the cost of computing these state features (e.g., search-based features). To this end, we introduce a cost-sensitive sparse linear-value function approximation algorithm — FOVEA — and demonstrate its performance on an experimental domain with a range of feature costs. Robby Goetschalckx, Scott Sanner, Kurt Driessens |
ECAI | 1 |
| 2008 | Cost-Sensitive Parsimonious Linear RegressionabstractWe examine linear regression problems where some features may only be observable at a cost (e.g., in medical domains where features may correspond to diagnostic tests that take time and costs money). This can be important in the context of data mining, in order to obtain the best predictions from the data on a limited cost budget. We define a parsimonious linear regression objective criterion that jointly minimizes prediction error and feature cost. We modify least angle regression algorithms commonly used for sparse linear regression to produce the ParLiR algorithm, which not only provides an efficient and parsimonious solution as we demonstrate empirically, but it also provides formal guarantees that we prove theoretically. Robby Goetschalckx, Kurt Driessens, Scott Sanner |
ICDM | 1 |
| 2007 | On Policy Learning in Restricted Policy Spaces
Robby Goetschalckx, Jan Ramon |
AAAI | 1 |