Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jiawen Wu 0004
dblp:64/11005-4
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-7309-2140ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Authentication and access control · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Authentication and access control
policy evaluation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | ANNPDP: An Efficient and Stable Evaluation Engine for Large-Scale Policy Sets · IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hash index · 0.6artificial neural network · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | ANNPDP: An Efficient and Stable Evaluation Engine for Large-Scale Policy SetsabstractAs interactions between individuals and services increase, requests are more frequent and policy sets are larger. The evaluation performance of PDP (Policy Decision Point) plays a key role in the operation of a system. In order to solve bottlenecks of improving the PDP evaluation performance for large-scale policy sets, we propose an evaluation engine based on artificial neural networks, namely ANNPDP. We transform rules in a large-scale policy set described in the XACML (eXtensible Access Control Markup Language) into numerical rules. Evaluation networks are established and trained by the numerical rules. In order to ensure the accuracy, a misjudgment set is constructed for error corrections and stored by hash indexes. By simulating the arrival of requests, ANNPDP is compared with the Sun PDP, HPEngine, XEngine, and SBA-XACML. The experiment results show that ANNPDP has: 1) high performance: if the number of requests reaches 10,000, the evaluation time of ANNPDP on the large-scale policy set with 100,000 rules is approximately 0.46, 0.93, 0.71, and 1.43 percent of that of the Sun PDP, HPEngine, XEngine, and SBA-XACML, respectively, and 2) stability: as the size of the large-scale policy set and the number of requests increase, the evaluation time of ANNPDP grows linearly. ANNPDP can satisfy the requirements of an authorization system with large-scale policy sets. Fan Deng 0003, Zhenhua Yu 0001, Liyong Zhang, Kexin Feng, Wenbin Kong, Jiawen Wu 0004 |
IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. | 8 |