Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kouichi Kishida

dblp:64/1731 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 12 · 7 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
5 papers
Empirical software engineering · 79% Software maintenance and evolution · 21%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia systems and quality of experience · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering
developer studies
0.012003
Toward an Understanding of the Motivation of Open Source Software Developers · ICSE 2003
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories
0.012003
Toward an Understanding of the Motivation of Open Source Software Developers · ICSE 2003
Empirical software engineering › open source software
open source communities
0.012003
Toward an Understanding of the Motivation of Open Source Software Developers · ICSE 2003
Software maintenance and evolution
software evolution
0.012001
A Case Study of the Evolution of Jun: An Object-Oriented Open-Source 3D Multimedia Library · ICSE 2001
Empirical software engineering
software engineering practice
0.011991
Non-Technological Issues in Software Engineering · ICSE 1991

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

legitimate peripheral participation · 0.1grounded theory · 0.1case study · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Process model for open innovation
abstract
This position paper presents some useful metaphors to think about new conceptual model for open innovation process.
Kouichi Kishida
ICSSP1
2014 Linguistic Analogy for Software Process Innovation
Kouichi Kishida
EuroSPI1
2011 Towards Innovative Software Projects - Creating Environments Supporting Innovation and Improvement
Kouichi Kishida
EuroSPI1
2004 Dynamic Community: A New Conceptual Framework for Supporting Knowledge Collaboration in Software Development
abstract
Software development is a knowledge intensive activity and software developers are knowledge workers. Knowledge needed for software development is often distributed among different developers. Supporting efficient knowledge collaboration and transfer is thus essential for software development organizations to remain competitive. This paper proposes a new theory /sub y/namic community to support knowledge collaboration and discusses its application in software development. Dynamic community integrates the traditional knowledge management approach in which knowledge is formalized and accumulated in knowledge repositories, and the community-based knowledge collaboration approach in which knowledge is transferred through informal community participation and human contacts. The dynamic community theory takes into full consideration individual knowledge workers' ever-changing needs for new knowledge as well as the role of social relationship of knowledge workers in effective knowledge collaboration. This paper introduces the dynamic community theory, a general system architecture of sociotechnical environments in support of dynamic community, and its application in software development.
Yunwen Ye, Yasuhiro Yamamoto, Kouichi Kishida
APSEC3
2003 Toward an Understanding of the Motivation of Open Source Software Developers
abstract
An Open Source Software (OSS) project is unlikely to be successful unless there is an accompanied community that provides the platform for developers and users to collaborate. Members of such communities are volunteers whose motivation to participate and contribute is of essential importance to the success of OSS projects. In this paper, we aim to create an understanding of what motivates people to participate in OSS communities. We theorize that learning is one of the motivational forces. Our theory is grounded in the learning theory of Legitimate Peripheral Participation, and is supported by analyzing the social structure of OSS communities and the co-evolution between OSS systems and communities. We also discuss practical implications of our theory for creating and maintaining sustainable OSS communities as well as for software engineering research and education.
Yunwen Ye, Kouichi Kishida
ICSE2
2001 A Case Study of the Evolution of Jun: An Object-Oriented Open-Source 3D Multimedia Library
abstract
Jun is a large open-source graphics and multimedia library. It is object-oriented and supports 3D geometry, topography and multimedia. This paper reviews the development of the Jun library from five perspectives: open-source, software evolution processes, development styles, technological support, and development data. It concludes with lessons learned from the perspective of a for-profit company providing open-source object-oriented software to the community.
Atsushi Aoki, Kaoru Hayashi, Kouichi Kishida, Kumiyo Nakakoji, Yoshiyuki Nishinaka, Brent Reeves, Akio Takashima, Yasuhiro Yamamoto
ICSE3
1996 Analysis of Software Process Improvement Experience Using the Project Visibility Index
abstract
Based on the capability maturity model (CMM), process improvement at OMRON, a Japanese microprocessor manufacturer, increased project predictability in three ways: accuracy, variability, and performance. The authors use the project visibility index (PVI) and other measurements to quantitatively demonstrate this. Qualitative analysis of how and why OMRON achieved higher project visibility and increases in the QCD (quality, cost, and delivery on time) factors are supported with data on review-effort ratios and productivity. They identify factors directly affected by high project visibility.
Keishi Sakamoto, Naoki Niihara, Toshifumi Tanaka, Kumiyo Nakakoji, Kouichi Kishida
APSEC5
1991 Non-Technological Issues in Software Engineering
Marc I. Kellner, Bill Curtis, Tom DeMarco, Kouichi Kishida, Maurice Schlumberger, Colin Tully
ICSE4
1991 Position Statement
Kouichi Kishida
ICSE1
1990 Technology Transfer Aspects of Environment Construction
Kouichi Kishida
ICSE1
1988 Evolution of Tools (Abstract)
Kouichi Kishida
ICSE1
1988 SDA: A Novel Approach to Software Environment Design and Construction
Kouichi Kishida, Takuya Katayama, Masatoshi Matsuo, Isao Miyamoto, Koichiro Ochimizu, Nobuo Saito, John H. Sayler, Koji Torii, Lloyd G. Williams
ICSE1