Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jörg Schellhase

dblp:64/1746 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 87% Multi-agent systems · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › nonmonotonic reasoning › preference handling › preference reasoning
conditional preferences
0.112006
Variable-Strength Conditional Preferences for Matchmaking in Description Logics · KR 2006
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
description logic
0.112006
Variable-Strength Conditional Preferences for Matchmaking in Description Logics · KR 2006
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 Variable-strength conditional preferences for ranking objects in ontologies
Thomas Lukasiewicz, Jörg Schellhase
J. Web Semant.2
2006 Variable-Strength Conditional Preferences for Ranking Objects in Ontologies
Thomas Lukasiewicz, Jörg Schellhase
ESWC2
2006 Variable-Strength Conditional Preferences for Matchmaking in Description Logics
Thomas Lukasiewicz, Jörg Schellhase
KR2
2002 Guideline - A Critical Success Factor in the Development of Web-Based Training
abstract
Guidelines represent an important instrument in the development of Web-based trainings (WBTs). They help to create reliable, portable, and interoperable, standardized WBTs of high-quality. The development of guidelines can be considered as a key success factor regarding the effectiveness of WBTs. The effects of guidelines can be both favourable and restrictive. Guidelines which are too rigid and strict could have counterproductive effects, therefore an optimum at guidelines is to be aimed at. This article discusses potentialities and restrictions of WBT guidelines. It can thus be of assistance in the project-specific development of guidelines. The importance of guidelines is illustrated by a case study of the inter-universitarian e-learning network Winfoline.
Oliver Bohl, Angela Frankfurth, Jörg Schellhase, Udo Winand
ICCE3
2002 The Sharable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM) - A Critical Review
abstract
Learning technology standards are increasingly gaining in importance in the field of Web-based teaching. At present, two standards dominating the market are taking shape. These are the SCORM standard of the ADL initiative and the AICC standard of the AICC organization. Based on the AICC and LOM meta data standards, the SCORM standard stands the chance to become the standard dominating the market. A number of restrictions are involved with the SCORM standard, though. The article shows general deficiencies of the SCORM standard that are critical concerning the market value of SCOs, the process of producing WBTs on the basis of different SCO providers, the maintenance of SCOs and WBTs (consisting of several SCOs), and the quality of WBTs based on SCOs of different providers.
Oliver Bohl, Jörg Schellhase, Ruth Senler, Udo Winand
ICCE2