Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Adam Vogel

dblp:64/178 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Reinforcement learning · 64% Robot navigation and mapping · 23% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 13%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Energy systems and smart grids · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning
inverse reinforcement learning
0.112012
Improving Hybrid Vehicle Fuel Efficiency Using Inverse Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2012
Energy systems and smart grids › energy management
vehicle energy management
0.112012
Improving Hybrid Vehicle Fuel Efficiency Using Inverse Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2012
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration
0.112008
Active reinforcement learning · ICML 2008
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process
0.112008
Active reinforcement learning · ICML 2008
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › reasoning about action and change
reasoning about actions
0.112006
Reasoning about Partially Observed Actions · AAAI 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic route prediction · 0.3inverse reinforcement learning · 0.3sensitivity analysis · 0.1policy optimization · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Learning to Reason Pragmatically with Cognitive Limitations
Adam Vogel, Andrés Goméz Emilsson, Michael C. Frank, Daniel Jurafsky, Christopher Potts
CogSci1
2013 Emergence of Gricean Maxims from Multi-Agent Decision Theory
Adam Vogel, Max Bodoia, Christopher Potts, Daniel Jurafsky
HLT-NAACL1
2012 Improving Hybrid Vehicle Fuel Efficiency Using Inverse Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Deciding what mix of engine and battery power to use is critical to hybrid vehicles' fuel efficiency. Current solutions consider several factors such as the charge of the battery and how efficient the engine operates at a given speed. Previous research has shown that by taking into account the future power requirements of the vehicle, a more efficient balance of engine vs. battery power can be attained. In this paper, we utilize a probabilistic driving route prediction system, trained using Inverse Reinforcement Learning, to optimize the hybrid control policy. Our approach considers routes that the driver is likely to be taking, computing an optimal mix of engine and battery power. This approach has the potential to increase vehicle power efficiency while not requiring any hardware modification or change in driver behavior. Our method outperforms a standard hybrid control policy, yielding an average of 1.22% fuel savings.
Adam Vogel, Deepak Ramachandran, Rakesh Gupta 0001, Antoine Raux
AAAI1
2010 Learning to Follow Navigational Directions
Adam Vogel, Daniel Jurafsky
ACL1
2008 Active reinforcement learning
abstract
When the transition probabilities and rewards of a Markov Decision Process (MDP) are known, an agent can obtain the optimal policy without any interaction with the environment. However, exact transition probabilities are difficult for experts to specify. One option left to an agent is a long and potentially costly exploration of the environment. In this paper, we propose another alternative: given initial (possibly inaccurate) specification of the MDP, the agent determines the sensitivity of the optimal policy to changes in transitions and rewards. It then focuses its exploration on the regions of space to which the optimal policy is most sensitive. We show that the proposed exploration strategy performs well on several control and planning problems.
Arkady Epshteyn, Adam Vogel, Gerald DeJong
ICML2
2006 Reasoning about Partially Observed Actions
Megan Nance, Adam Vogel, Eyal Amir
AAAI2