EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yunsong Guo
dblp:64/2670
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
5as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 5 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Graph learning · 69% Optimization for machine learning · 20% Learning paradigms · 6% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers |
Information retrieval · 96% Data mining · 4% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 50% Mathematical optimization · 50% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
multi-task optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | MetaBalance: Improving Multi-Task Recommendations via Adapting Gradient Magnitudes of Auxiliary Tasks · WWW 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › network alignment
embedding-based graph alignment |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Balancing Consistency and Disparity in Network Alignment · KDD 2021 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph convolutional network |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Balancing Consistency and Disparity in Network Alignment · KDD 2021 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Balancing Consistency and Disparity in Network Alignment · KDD 2021 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
network alignment |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Balancing Consistency and Disparity in Network Alignment · KDD 2021 |
Information retrieval › text analysis
keyword extraction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Natural Language Annotations for Search Engine Optimization · WWW 2020 |
Information retrieval
query understanding |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Natural Language Annotations for Search Engine Optimization · WWW 2020 |
Information retrieval › web search
search engine optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Natural Language Annotations for Search Engine Optimization · WWW 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | MetaBalance: Improving Multi-Task Recommendations via Adapting Gradient Magnitudes of Auxiliary Tasks · WWW 2022 |
Information retrieval › document retrieval › domain-specific retrieval › legal information retrieval › patent retrieval
prior art search |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Ranking Structured Documents: A Large Margin Based Approach for Patent Prior Art Search · IJCAI 2009 |
Information retrieval
ranking |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Ranking Structured Documents: A Large Margin Based Approach for Patent Prior Art Search · IJCAI 2009 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Ranking Structured Documents: A Large Margin Based Approach for Patent Prior Art Search · IJCAI 2009 |
Mathematical optimization › sparse learning
feature selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Learning Optimal Subsets with Implicit User Preferences · IJCAI 2009 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
preference learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Learning Optimal Subsets with Implicit User Preferences · IJCAI 2009 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sequence labeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Comparisons of sequence labeling algorithms and extensions · ICML 2007 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
structured prediction |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Comparisons of sequence labeling algorithms and extensions · ICML 2007 |
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
ensemble learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Comparisons of sequence labeling algorithms and extensions · ICML 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-task learning · 1.1gradient manipulation · 1.1negative sampling · 0.5graph convolutional network · 0.5logistic regression · 0.4XGBoost · 0.4structured SVM · 0.1max-margin markov network · 0.1hidden markov model · 0.1conditional random field · 0.1averaged perceptron · 0.1SEARN · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | MetaBalance: Improving Multi-Task Recommendations via Adapting Gradient Magnitudes of Auxiliary TasksabstractIn many personalized recommendation scenarios, the generalization ability of a target task can be improved via learning with additional auxiliary tasks alongside this target task on a multi-task network. However, this method often suffers from a serious optimization imbalance problem. On the one hand, one or more auxiliary tasks might have a larger influence than the target task and even dominate the network weights, resulting in worse recommendation accuracy for the target task. On the other hand, the influence of one or more auxiliary tasks might be too weak to assist the target task. More challenging is that this imbalance dynamically changes throughout the training process and varies across the parts of the same network. We propose a new method: MetaBalance to balance auxiliary losses via directly manipulating their gradients w.r.t the shared parameters in the multi-task network. Specifically, in each training iteration and adaptively for each part of the network, the gradient of an auxiliary loss is carefully reduced or enlarged to have a closer magnitude to the gradient of the target loss, preventing auxiliary tasks from being so strong that dominate the target task or too weak to help the target task. Moreover, the proximity between the gradient magnitudes can be flexibly adjusted to adapt MetaBalance to different scenarios. The experiments show that our proposed method achieves a significant improvement of 8.34% in terms of [email protected] upon the strongest baseline on two real-world datasets. The code of our approach can be found at here.1 Yun He 0001, Geng Ji 0001, Yunsong Guo, James Caverlee |
WWW | 5 |
| 2021 | Balancing Consistency and Disparity in Network AlignmentabstractNetwork alignment plays an important role in a variety of applications. Many traditional methods explicitly or implicitly assume the alignment consistency which might suffer from over-smoothness, whereas some recent embedding based methods could somewhat embrace the alignment disparity by sampling negative alignment pairs. However, under different or even competing designs of negative sampling distributions, some methods advocate positive correlation which could result in false negative samples incorrectly violating the alignment consistency, whereas others champion negative correlation or uniform distribution to sample nodes which may contribute little to learning meaningful embeddings. In this paper, we demystify the intrinsic relationships behind various network alignment methods and between these competing design principles of sampling. Specifically, in terms of model design, we theoretically reveal the close connections between a special graph convolutional network model and the traditional consistency based alignment method. For model training, we quantify the risk of embedding learning for network alignment with respect to the sampling distributions. Based on these, we propose NeXtAlign which strikes a balance between alignment consistency and disparity. We conduct extensive experiments that demonstrate the proposed method achieves significant improvements over the state-of-the-arts. Hanghang Tong, Yinglong Xia, Yunsong Guo |
KDD | 5 |
| 2020 | Natural Language Annotations for Search Engine OptimizationabstractUnderstanding content at scale is a difficult but important problem for many platforms. Many previous studies focus on content understanding to optimize engagement with existing users. However, little work studies how to leverage better content understanding to attract new users. In this work, we build a framework for generating natural language content annotations and show how they can be used for search engine optimization. The proposed framework relies on an XGBoost model that labels “pins” with high probability phrases, and a logistic regression layer that learns to rank aggregated annotations for groups of content. The pipeline identifies keywords that are descriptive and contextually meaningful. We perform a large-scale production experiment deployed on the Pinterest platform and show that natural language annotations cause a 1-2% increase in traffic from leading search engines. This increase is statistically significant. Finally, we explore and interpret the characteristics of our annotations framework. Porter Jenkins, Jennifer Zhao, Heath Vinicombe, Anant Subramanian, Arun Prasad, Atillia Dobi, Eileen Li, Yunsong Guo |
WWW | 8 |
| 2009 | Learning Optimal Subsets with Implicit User Preferences
Yunsong Guo, Carla P. Gomes |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2009 | Ranking Structured Documents: A Large Margin Based Approach for Patent Prior Art Search
Yunsong Guo, Carla P. Gomes |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2008 | Metric Learning: A Support Vector Approach
Nam Nguyen 0001, Yunsong Guo |
ECML/PKDD (2) | 2 |
| 2007 | Comparisons of sequence labeling algorithms and extensionsabstractIn this paper, we survey the current state-of-art models for structured learning problems, including Hidden Markov Model (HMM), Conditional Random Fields (CRF), Averaged Perceptron (AP), Structured SVMs (SVMstruct), Max Margin Markov Networks (M3N), and an integration of search and learning algorithm (SEARN). With all due tuning efforts of various parameters of each model, on the data sets we have applied the models to, we found that SVMstruct enjoys better performance compared with the others. In addition, we also propose a new method which we call the Structured Learning Ensemble (SLE) to combine these structured learning models. Empirical results show that our SLE algorithm provides more accurate solutions compared with the best results of the individual models. Nam Nguyen 0001, Yunsong Guo |
ICML | 2 |
| 2007 | ExOpaque: A Framework to Explain Opaque Machine Learning Models Using Inductive Logic ProgrammingabstractIn this paper we developed an Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) based framework ExOpaque that is able to extract a set of Horn clauses from an arbitrary opaque machine learning model, to describe the behavior of the opaque model with high fidelity while maintaining the simplicity of the Horn clauses for human interpretations. Yunsong Guo, Bart Selman |
ICTAI (2) | 1 |
| 2005 | Using a Lagrangian Heuristic for a Combinatorial Auction ProblemabstractIn this paper, a combinatorial auction problem is modeled as a NP-complete set packing problem and a Lagrangian relaxation based heuristic algorithm is proposed. Extensive experiments are conducted using benchmark CATS test sets and more complex test sets. The algorithm provides optimal solutions for most test sets and is always 1%from the optimal solutions for all CATS test sets. Comparisons with CPLEX 8.0 are also provided, which show that the algorithm provides good solutions Yunsong Guo, Andrew Lim 0001, Brian Rodrigues, Jiqing Tang |
ICTAI | 1 |
| 2003 | Transportation Bid Analysis Optimization with Shipper InputabstractThis paper extends carrier assignment models used in bid analysis for transportation procurement to incorporate shipper business considerations. These include restricting carrier numbers, favoring incumbents and performance considerations. We provide representative models and develop solutions for these which include the use of metaheuristics. Experimentation shows that our algorithms work well. Yunsong Guo, Andrew Lim 0001, Brian Rodrigues |
ICTAI | 1 |